International Heart Journal
Online ISSN : 1349-3299
Print ISSN : 1349-2365
ISSN-L : 1349-2365
Clinical Studies
Comparison of Neointimal Response between Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent and Bioabsorbable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Severely Calcified Lesions Requiring Rotational Atherectomy
Serial OCT Analysis
Yuji MatsudaTakashi AshikagaTaro SasaokaYu HatanoTomoyuki UmemotoTetsumin LeeTaishi YonetsuYasuhiro MaejimaTetsuo Sasano
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
Supplementary material

2020 Volume 61 Issue 4 Pages 665-672

Details
Abstract

Clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for severely calcified lesions remain poor. The purpose of this study was to investigate the neointimal response after everolimus-eluting stents (EES) for severely calcified lesions treated with rotational atherectomy (RA) using optical coherence tomography (OCT).

We retrospectively analyzed 34 lesions in which PCI was performed with EES deployment following RA and OCT was performed immediately after PCI and at follow-up (nine months). The EES was either durable-polymer (DP) EES (22 lesions) or bioabsorbable polymer (BP) -EES (12 lesions). Strut coverage and malapposition were evaluated at 1-mm intervals of cross-section (CS) by serial OCT analysis. Malapposed strut was defined as having the distance from luminal border > 100 μm.

A total of 11,823 struts immediately after PCI and 11,720 struts at follow-up were analyzed. Immediately after PCI, the strut-level analysis showed no significant differences in the percentage of malapposed struts between the DP-EES group and the BP-EES group. At follow-up, the BP-EES group showed a more prevalent covered strut compared with the DP-EES group (strut-level analysis: 95% versus 97%, P = 0.045; CS-level analysis: 97% versus 100%, P < 0.01; lesion-level analysis: 27% versus 83%, P < 0.01, respectively).

In severely calcified lesions requiring RA, the BP-EES group achieved better neointimal coverage than the DP-EES group at nine months. Additional prospective studies are needed.

Content from these authors
© 2020 by the International Heart Journal Association
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top