International Heart Journal
Online ISSN : 1349-3299
Print ISSN : 1349-2365
ISSN-L : 1349-2365

この記事には本公開記事があります。本公開記事を参照してください。
引用する場合も本公開記事を引用してください。

Discrimination of Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation
Tazuru IgarashiShinichi NiwanoHidehira FukayaTomoharu YoshizawaHironori NakamuraTamami FujiishiNaruya IshizueJun OikawaJun KishiharaMasami MurakamiHiroe NiwanoJunya Ako
著者情報
キーワード: P wave
ジャーナル フリー 早期公開

論文ID: 15-476

この記事には本公開記事があります。
詳細
抄録

Discrimination between paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (PAF and persistent AF) is important for determining the therapeutic strategy in patients with new-onset AF. We evaluated various clinical factors and P wave morphology to discriminate PAF and persistent AF patients in patients with new-onset AF.

The study population consisted of 79 patients with new-onset AF (70.3 ± 10.8 years, female:male 33:46) who were retrospectively selected from 8,632 AF patients in the Kitasato University Hospital ECG storing system. PAF (n = 38) and persistent AF (n = 41) patients were diagnosed by whether the initial PAF episode continued for 1 week. The P wave morphologies were analyzed using the most recent 12 lead-ECG recording of sinus rhythm. P wave dispersion was defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum durations of all leads. Along with these data, various clinical factors were evaluated and compared between PAF and persistent AF patients.

Multivariate analysis identified P wave dispersion (56.6 ± 14.8 versus 66.5 ± 12.8 msec, P = 0.002) and left atrial dimension (LAD: 40.2 ± 7.0 versus 47.7 ± 8.2 mm, P < 0.001) as independent factors for discrimination between PAF and persistent AF patients. Combining these two parameters achieved a specificity of 88.9%, a positive predictive value of 81.8%, a sensitivity of 95.3%, and a negative predictive value of 88.9%.

In patients with new-onset AF, P wave dispersion and LAD were independent factors for discrimination between PAF and persistent AF.

著者関連情報
© 2016 by the International Heart Journal Association
feedback
Top