Journal of Applied Glycoscience
Online ISSN : 1880-7291
Print ISSN : 1344-7882
ISSN-L : 1344-7882
Regular Paper
Evaluation of Ammonia Pretreatment for Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Sugarcane Bagasse to Recover Xylooligosaccharides
Sosyu TsutsuiKiyoshi SakuragiKiyohiko IgarashiMasahiro SamejimaSatoshi Kaneko
Author information
JOURNALS OPEN ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML

2020 Volume 67 Issue 1 Pages 17-22

Details
Abstract

Sugarcane bagasse is a useful biomass resource. In the present study, we examined the efficacy of ammonia pretreatment for selective release of hemicellulose from bagasse. Pretreatment of bagasse with aqueous ammonia resulted in significant loss of xylan. In contrast, pretreatment of bagasse with anhydrous ammonia resulted in almost no xylan loss. Aqueous ammonia or anhydrous ammonia-pretreated bagasse was then subjected to enzymatic digestion with a xylanase from the glycoside hydrolase (GH) family 10 or a xylanase from the GH family 11. The hydrolysis rate of xylan in bagasse pretreated with aqueous ammonia was approximately 50 %. In contrast, in the anhydrous ammonia-treated bagasse, xylan hydrolysis was > 80 %. These results suggested that anhydrous ammonia pretreatment would be an effective method for preparation of sugarcane bagasse for enzymatic hydrolysis to recover xylooligosaccharides.

Abbreviations

AFEX, ammonia fiber expansion; CAZy, carbohydrate active enzymes; FT-IR, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy; GH, glycoside hydrolase; GH10, glycoside hydrolase family 10; GH11, glycoside hydrolase family 11; LCC, lignin–carbohydrate complex; SoXyn10A, xylanase A from Streptomyces olivaceoviridis E-86 belonging glycoside hydrolase family 10; SoXyn11A, xylanase B from Streptomyces olivaceoviridis E-86 belonging glycoside hydrolase family 11; A1X4, O-β-D-xylopyranosyl-(1→4)-[O-α-L-arabinofuranosyl-(1→3)]-O-β-D-xylopyranosyl-(1→4)-O-β-D-xylopyranosyl-(1→4)-β-D-xylopyranose.

INTRODUCTION

Sugarcane bagasse is a by-product of the sugar production process. Cogenerated energy derived from bagasse is used as an energy source to operate sugar factories. However, surplus bagasse tends to accumulate if the factory occupancy rate increases. Generally, the low energy density and light specific gravity of biomasses hinder their efficient utilization such as energy sources, as these features increase transportation costs. However, because bagasse has a high energy density compared to other biomass resources, it potentially is a desirable biomass resource.1)2)

Plant cell walls, such as bagasse, are primarily comprised of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin. Often, biomass utilization processes such as bioethanol production use only cellulose, and the hemicellulose and lignin remain unused. Thus, these biomass utilization processes are not practical, as more than half of the resources are not exploited.

In order to increase the possible use of hemicellulose, our group has been studying the enzymatic degradation of hemicellulose.3)4)5)6)7)8)9)10)11)12)13)14) Biomass pretreatment is required prior to its enzymatic degradation. However, pretreatment methods to optimize enzyme-mediated recovery of hemicellulose have not been studied. In the present study, we investigated the relationship between ammonia pretreatment and enzymatic degradation of bagasse in order to find a suitable pretreatment method to allow efficient hemicellulose recovery from biomass resources.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Biomass and pretreatment. Sugarcane bagasse was a kind gift from Mitsui Sugar Co., Ltd. Figure 1 illustrates the workflow of the pretreatment strategy. Aqueous ammonia pretreatment was performed by immersing 10 g dry bagasse in 3 % (w/w) or 5 % (w/w) aqueous ammonia, followed by incubation at 85 °C for 24 h. Thereafter, the treated bagasse was washed with running water until the pH became neutral, and the sample was subsequently dried at 60 °C. Non-aqueous ammonia treatment was conducted according to a method previously reported by Sakuragi et al.15) Briefly, 30 g dry bagasse was placed in a pressure vessel and filled with ammonia gas, and the sample was incubated at 100 °C for 2.5 h at 6 MPa.

Fig. 1. The flowchart of ammonia pretreatment of bagasse followed by enzyme hydrolysis.

Enzyme hydrolysis. Two xylanases derived from Streptomyces olivaceoviridis E-86 were used. One xylanase is a member of the glycoside hydrolase (GH) family 10 (GH10, SoXyn10A), and the other is a member of the GH family 11 (GH11, SoXyn11B). A description of the GH families is available at the CAZy website (http://afmb.cnrs-mrs.fr/CAZY/).16) SoXyn10A and SoXyn11B were prepared according to previously reported methods.3)13) Each enzyme reaction mixture contained 2 g bagasse, 50 mL distilled water, 40 mL McIlvaine buffer (pH 7.0), and 10 mL purified enzyme preparation (0.17 µmol SoXyn10A or SoXyn11B). The reactions were incubated at 40 °C for 72 h, and were terminated by heating at 100 °C for 20 min. Insoluble materials were collected by centrifugation, followed by three washes with distilled water. The samples were then dried in an oven at 60 °C.

Analysis . The compositions (neutral sugars, organic acids, lignins and nitrogen content) of untreated and ammonia-pretreated bagasses were analyzed according to a previously described method.15) The Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) spectrum was measured using an FT/IR-6100 spectrophotometer (JASCO, Tokyo, Japan) in transmittance mode from 4000 to 400 cm−1 in a KBr disc. The KBr disc was prepared by dispersing the solid sample in KBr salt. For analysis of the solubilized hydrolysis products of control and pretreated bagasse samples, the reaction mixtures described above were subjected to high-performance liquid chromatography and assessed using an IR detector (LC-2000Plus, JASCO, Tokyo, Japan). The samples were analyzed using an HPX-87P column (7.8 × 300 mm, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and eluted with distilled water at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min at 70 °C.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Effect of ammonia pretreatment on bagasse composition.

Several pretreatment methods for biomass, such as acid, hydrothermal, ionic liquids and alkali have been reported.17) Acid and hydrothermal pretreatments remove hemicellulose from biomass, and are not suitable for enzymatic degradation of hemicellulose. There have been several attempts to produce xylooligosaccharides from mushroom waste beds and corn cobs using hydrothermal treatment.18)19) In these studies, more than 80 % of the hemicellulose fraction was recovered from corn cobs, but a significant amount of furfural was also detected.

Ammonia pretreatment is an alkali pretreatment method, and has been widely used in hemicellulase research.20) Ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX) pretreatment results in cellulose decrystallization, partial hemicellulose depolymerization, removal of hemicellulose acetyl groups, cleavage of lignin–carbohydrate complex (LCC) linkages, lignin C–O–C bond cleavage, increased accessible surface area due to structural disruption, and increased wettability of treated biomass.21) There are a few studies evaluating ammonia pretreatment of bagasse, but the aims of these studies were saccharification and conversion to ethanol or biogas, not recovery of the hemicellulose fraction.22)23)24)25)26) Thus, we investigated whether pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse with aqueous or anhydrous ammonia was effective at recovering hemicellulose.

The composition of bagasse before and after aqueous or anhydrous ammonia pretreatment is shown in Table 1. In the aqueous ammonia pretreatment group, the post-treatment bagasse weight decreased with increased ammonia concentrations of 3 % to 5 %. Lignin content tended to decrease in proportion to ammonia concentration. Hemicellulose content also slightly decreased when the ammonia concentration was increased (Fig. 2). On the other hand, except for amide formation, no significant change in composition was observed with anhydrous ammonia pretreatment. Because the acetyl group in bagasse was removed by aqueous ammonia treatment, the dissociated acetyl group from the biomass was likely dehydrated and condensed with ammonia to form acetamide in the anhydrous ammonia treated bagasse.

Table 1. The compositions of bagasse before and after pretreatment.
Treatment Enzymes Glc
(%)
Xyl
(%)
Gal
(%)
Ara
(%)
Man
(%)
GlcA
(%)
KL
(%)
AcOH
(%)
N
(%)
Recovery of
weight (%)
37.3 22.6 0.9 2.2 0.6 N.D. 17.8 0.8 0.3 100.0
0 % 33.3 22.0 1.4 2.6 0.4 N.D. 19.2 0.8 0.2 91.7
3 % 39.1 24.7 1.1 2.7 0.5 N.D. 11.5 0.0 0.2 75.4
5 % 39.9 24.8 1.0 2.7 0.5 N.D. 10.0 0.1 0.2 73.0
Anhydrous 34.9 23.6 1.6 3.5 0.5 N.D. 13.4 0.8 2.0 96.7
GH10 31.9 22.2 1.4 2.6 0.5 N.D. 20.8 0.7 0.2 93.6
0 % GH10 34.6 22.7 1.4 2.5 0.5 N.D. 19.2 0.7 0.2 87.8
3 % GH10 44.1 18.6 1.2 2.0 0.6 N.D. 14.2 0.0 0.3 66.6
5 % GH10 48.3 17.5 1.2 1.9 0.6 N.D. 16.3 0.0 0.2 64.5
Anhydrous GH10 50.9 7.7 1.2 1.1 0.7 N.D. 20.9 0.0 0.8 59.7
GH11 35.8 24.2 1.3 2.2 0.5 N.D. 19.7 0.7 0.2 90.8
0 % GH11 35.7 23.4 1.6 2.8 0.5 N.D. 19.0 0.7 0.2 87.3
3 % GH11 49.4 15.6 1.3 1.9 0.7 N.D. 13.8 0.0 0.3 62.6
5 % GH11 51.0 14. 7 1.2 1.7 0.6 N.D. 11.5 0.0 0.2 60.9
Anhydrous GH11 45.9 5.6 1.0 1.0 0.6 N.D. 19.2 0.0 0.7 57.8

―, no treatment; N.D., not detected.

Fig. 2. Xylan content in biomass.

 The xylan content of each sample was calculated relative to that of untreated bagasse. 1: untreated; 2: incubated with DW at 85 °C for 24 h; 3: incubated with 3 % ammonia solution at 85 °C for 24 h; 4: incubated with 5 % ammonia solution at 85 °C for 24 h; 5: incubated with anhydrous ammonia at 6 MPa, 100 °C for 2.5 h; 6, SoXyn10A hydrolysate of 1; 7, SoXyn10A hydrolysate of 2; 8, SoXyn10A hydrolysate of 3; 9, SoXyn10A hydrolysate of 4; 10, SoXyn10A hydrolysate of 5; 11, SoXyn11B hydrolysate of 1; 12, SoXyn11B hydrolysate of 2; 13, SoXyn11B hydrolysate of 3; 14, SoXyn11B hydrolysate of 4; 15, SoXyn11B hydrolysate of 5.

Effect of ammonia pretreatment on enzyme-mediated xylan degradation.

Next, control and pretreated bagasse was digested with GH10 or GH11 xylanases from S. olivaceoviridis E-86 (Table 1). The weights of the GH10 xylanase hydrolysate from aqueous or anhydrous ammonia-pretreated bagasse were 66.5 % (3 % aqueous ammonia), 64.5 % (5 % aqueous ammonia), and 59.7 % (anhydrous ammonia) relative to the weight of non-treated bagasse. Correspondingly, the xylan hydrolysis rates were 34 % (3 % aqueous ammonia), 38 % (5 % aqueous ammonia), and 80 % (anhydrous ammonia). In contrast, the weight of the GH11 xylanase hydrolysate from aqueous or anhydrous ammonia-pretreated bagasse was 62.6 % (3 % ammonia), 60.9 % (5 % ammonia), and 57.8 % (anhydrous ammonia) relative to the weight of non-treated bagasse, which corresponded to 48, 51, and 86 %, respectively of the hydrolysis rate calculated from the xylan content in pretreated bagasse. The xylan hydrolysis rates by either GH10 or GH11 xylanases in anhydrous ammonia-pretreated bagasse were high (> 80 %). Compared to GH10 xylanase, GH11 xylanase exhibited a higher xylan hydrolysis rate in all pretreated samples.

Interestingly, the amount of Glc in the SoXyn11B hydrolysate was significantly low (45.9 %) compared to the SoXyn10A hydrolysate (50.9 %). As discussed in a previous study,13) the compact wide shallow structure of the GH11 substrate binding cleft could facilitate more efficient substrate binding of the cellulose-xylan complex compared to GH10, resulting in increased cellulose solubilization from the biomass.

Although xylanase, arabinofuranosidase and mannanase exhibited synergistic effects on hemicellulose hydrolysis after lime treatment of bagasse,27) only initial hydrolysis rates of the hydrolysis were investigated, and the final hydrolysis rates were not reported. Thus, it was unclear how much bagasse hemicellulose was broken down by these hemicellulases. The merit of using enzyme as a tool for selective release of hemicellulose from biomass is not only environmentally friendly and equipment friendly, but also allows for removal of heteropolysaccharide-containing pentose without generating compounds toxic to yeast, such as furfural. There are several reports of bagasse pretreatment with aqueous ammonia followed by saccharification and fermentation.22)23)24) In these cases, hemicellulose degradation products, together with cellulose degradation products, are fermented, resulting in inefficient fermentation. These approaches apparently do not take advantage of the enzyme substrate specificity, which precisely discriminates substrate structure for selective cleavage of hemicellulose. Because hemicellulose (xylan) is a heteropolysaccharide and it is difficult to control the cleavage sites with acid or hydrothermal treatment, the products obtained after these treatments are mixtures of xylose, arabinose, galactose, mannose and other compounds, precluding recovery and utilization of hemicellulose. In contrast, enzyme-mediated cleavage produces products exhibit a defined structure. This is advantageous, as the heterogeneous and complex structure of hemicellulose can be recovered in a homogeneous state, allowing for more convenient functional analysis of the products. It is known that the GH10 xylanase produces the following xylooligosaccharides: O-α-L-arabinofuranosyl-(l→3)-O-β-D-xylopyranosyl-(1→4)-β-D-xylopyranose (A1X2), O-β-D-xylopyranosyl-(1→4)-[O-α-L-arabinofuranosyl-(1→3)]-O-β-D-xylopyranosyl-(1→4)-β-D-xylopyranose (A1X3) and O-4-O-methyl-α-D-glucuronosyl-(l→2)-O-β-D-xylopyranosyl-(1→4)-O-β-D-xylopyranosyl-(1→4)-β-D-xylopyranose (MeGlcA3Xyl3). In contrast, the GH11 xylanase produces the following xylooligosaccharides: O-β-D-xylopyranosyl-(1→4)-[O-α-L-arabinofuranosyl-(1→3)]-O-β-D-xylopyranosyl-(1→4)-O-β-D-xylopyranosyl-(1→4)-β-D-xylopyranose (A1X4) and O-β-D-xylopyranosyl-(1→4)-[O-4-O-methyl-α--D-glucuronopyranosyl-(l→2)]-O-β-D-xylopyranosyl-(1→4)-O-β-D-xylopyranosyl-(1→4)-β-D-xylopyranose (MeGlcA3Xyl4) as a branched oligosaccharide.28)29) Theproportions of soluble products were analyzed after digestion of anhydrous ammonia-pretreated bagasse with SoXyn10A or SoXyn11B (Table 2). Xylose (6.9 %), xylobiose (26 %), xylotriose (9.3 %), xylotetraose (15 %), and a branched oligosaccharide mixture of A1X2 and A1X3 (14 %) were detected in the SoXyn10A reaction mixture supernatant. Xylose (3.4 %), xylobiose (20 %), xylotriose (18 %), xylotetraose (2 %), and the branched oligosaccharide A1X4 (35 %) were detected in the SoXyn11B reaction mixture supernatant. The highest yield of branched oligosaccharide was the SoXyn11B product A1X4, and the oligosaccharide yield was calculated as 8.4 g recovered from 100 g anhydrous ammonia-pretreated bagasse.

Table 2. Proportion of oligosaccharides detected in the supernatant of enzyme reaction mixture.
Substituted
oligosaccharides
Xylose Xylobiose Xylotriose Xylotetraose
SoXyn10A 14.0 % 6.9 % 26.0 % 9.3 % 15.0 %
SoXyn11B 35.0 % 3.4 % 20.0 % 18.0 % 2.0 %

To determine why the remaining xylan in the hydrolysis residue could not be decomposed, FT-IR analysis was performed. The absorption peaks near 1,745 cm−1 and 1,245 cm−1, which were attributable to the acetyl group, were eliminated by ammonia pretreatment (Fig. 3A). A new peak around 1,650 cm−1, corresponding to the formation of amide bonds, was observed in anhydrous ammonia-pretreated bagasse (Fig. 3A1), and the peak was completely eliminated by xylanase digestion (Fig. 3B1 and Fig. 3C1). These observations were consistent with the biomass composition analysis (Table 1). However, no significant features of the structure were found to be related to the remaining xylan in the hydrolysis residue.

Fig. 3. FT-IR spectra of bagasse before and after enzyme hydrolysis.

 FT-IR analysis of bagasse was conducted before and after enzyme hydrolysis. A, samples lacking enzyme; B. SoXyn10A hydrolysate; C, SoXyn11B hydrolysate. a, cellulose-h bonding; b, acetyl group (lignin & hemicellulose); c, amide bonds; d and e, aromatic ring of lignin; f, acetyl group. 1: incubated with anhydrous ammonia at 6 MPa, 100 °C for 2.5 h; 2: incubated with 5 % ammonia solution at 85 °C for 24 h; 3: incubated with 3 % ammonia solution at 85 °C for 24 h; 4: incubated with DW at 85 °C for 24 h, 5: untreated.

CONCLUSION

The effect of ammonia pretreatment on xylan recovery efficiency from sugarcane bagasse was evaluated. Aqueous ammonia pretreatment, which is effective for xylan recovery from rice straw,20) was not as effective in bagasse, in spite of the decrease in biomass weight after aqueous ammonia pretreatment. In contrast, anhydrous ammonia pretreatment of bagasse had great potential for enhanced xylan recovery, as it did not result in hemicellulose loss, and the subsequent enzyme-mediated hemicellulose hydrolysis rate was significantly high. Furthermore, most of the lignin was retained in the biomass after hemicellulose hydrolysis, suggesting that the hemicellulose-lignin network was cleaved almost completely by anhydrous ammonia pretreatment. Therefore, it could be possible to refine cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin from bagasse if the lignin is selectively dissolved prior to hemicellulose hydrolysis.

As demonstrated in the present study, although it was possible to produce defined branched oligosaccharide structures with ammonia pretreatment, this strategy produced a mixture of linear oligosaccharides with different degrees of polymerization. If the size of the linear oligosaccharides can be controlled to produce a more homogeneous product, the utility of hemicellulose would likely be enhanced. This is a topic to be investigated in future studies.

In addition, we would like to emphasize that selective xylan hydrolysis led to the production of fine cellulose. Because cellulose nanofiber has great potential as a new material, the need hemicellulose coexisting with cellulose is increasing. Thus far, the use of hemicellulose has not been developed because there was no sample to examine, but we believe this study will contribute to the use of hemicellulose by enabling mass production of xylooligosaccharides with defined branched structures.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to Mitsui Sugar Co. Ltd. for providing sugarcane bagasse.

REFERENCES
 
© 2020 by The Japanese Society of Applied Glycoscience

This is an open-access paper distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (by-nc) License (CC-BY-NC4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
feedback
Top