2002 Volume 23 Pages 94-99
There are usual criticisms toward the term "risk communication". But we will use this term in neutral sense, because we have to communicate on risks. In this paper we take the example of the relation between endocrine disruptors problem and the PRTR Law and reconsider about risk communication. This problem includes many chemicals. So senders of risk communication cannot respond all of request for information of receivers of risk communication. But In this kind of problem, risks cannot help amplifying through mass media. We think that citizens (receivers of risk communication) cannot be the subjects for comparing risks, when they cannot get the information they want. On the other hand, we can understand that the strict scientific judgments are needed for experts. We cannot decide whether we should follow to the strict scientific judgments, or requests of public opinion. Here, we have to discuss which way to choose. But in Japan, senders of risk communication seem to have no discussion about this point.