Quality analysis of the clinical laboratory literature and its effectiveness on clinical quality improvement: a systematic review

Abstract

Quality improvement in clinical laboratories is crucial to ensure accurate and reliable test results. With increasing awareness of ‍the potential adverse effects of errors in laboratory practice on ‍patient outcomes, the need for continual improvement of laboratory services cannot be overemphasized. A literature search was conducted on PubMed and a web of science core collection between October and February 2021 to evaluate the scientific literature quality of clinical laboratory quality improvement; only ‍peer-reviewed articles written in English that met quality improvement criteria were included. A structured template was used to extract data, and the papers were rated on a scale of 0–16 using the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-‍MQCS). Out of 776 studies, 726 were evaluated for clinical laboratory literature quality analysis. Studies were analyzed according to the ‍quality improvement and control methods and interventions, such as training, education, task force, and observation. Results showed that the average score of QI-MQCS for quality improvement papers from 1981–2000 was 2.5, while from 2001–2020, it was 6.8, indicating continuous high-quality improvement in the clinical laboratory sector. However, there is still room to ‍establish a proper system to judge the quality of clinical laboratory literature and improve accreditation programs within the sector.