Journal of Computer Chemistry, Japan
Online ISSN : 1347-3824
Print ISSN : 1347-1767
ISSN-L : 1347-1767

This article has now been updated. Please use the final version.

Structural Investigation of Four Dinuclear Iron(III) Complexes Relevant to Renal Injuries
Keita AbeHiroshi SakiyamaYuzo Nishida
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML Advance online publication

Article ID: 2015-0002

Details
Abstract

Some iron(III) complexes, including [Fe2(μ-O)(nta)2(H2O)2]2– (1), [Fe2(μ-O)(edda)2(H2O)2] (2), and [Fe2(μ-O)(ida)2(H2O)4] (3), are considered to be carcinogens causing renal injuries according to the results of previous animal experiments, where nitrilotriacetate [(nta)3–], ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetate [(edda)2–], and iminodiacetate [(ida)2–] are the chelating ligands (chelators). On the other hand, a similar iron(III) complex [Fe2(μ-O)(pac)2(H2O)2] (4) is not considered to be a carcinogen, where N-(2-pyridylmethyl) iminodiacetate [(pac)2–] is the chelating ligand. In order to clarify the differences in carcinogenicity, the structures of complexes 14 were investigated based on the density functional theory (DFT) method, because the structures of complexes had not been clarified in solution. As a result, two-point interaction with hydrogen peroxide or α-helix was found to be possible for carcinogenic iron(III) complexes 1 and 3, whereas the interaction was found to be impossible for non-carcinogenic iron(III) complex 4.

Figures
Figure 1.

 Chemical structures of chelating ligands (chelators).

Figure 2.

 Structures of optimized isomers A1-A4.

Figure 3.

 Three isomers for an octahedral edda complex (trans, cis-α, and cis-β) and two conformational isomers for ethylene diamine moiety.

Figure 4.

 Structures of optimized isomers B1-B14.

Figure 5.

 Structures of optimized isomers C1-C12.

Figure 6.

 Structures of optimized isomers D1-D9.

Figure 7.

 Interaction of dinuclear iron(III) complexes with hydrogen peroxide. [Fe2(μ-O)(nta)2(μ-H2O2)]2– complex anions (A1-H2O2-1 and A1-H2O2-2) and [Fe2(μ-O)(ida)2(μ-H2O2)(H2O)2] complexes (C1-H2O2-1 and C1-H2O2-2).

Figure 8.

 Formation of [Fe2(μ-O)(edda)2(μ-H2O2)] (B1-H2O2) after a large deformation.

Figure 9.

 Interaction of dinuclear iron(III) complexes with tetraglycine (TG) in an α-helix form. [Fe2(μ-O)(nta)2(μ-TG)]2– complex anions (A1-helix and A1*-helix) and [Fe2(μ-O)(ida)2(μ-TG)(H2O)2] complexes (C1-helix and C1*-helix). Symbol * represents an inverted structure.

Tables
Table 1. Optimized isomers for [Fe2(μ-O)(nta)2(H2O)2]2–.
NoIsomerPoint GroupEnergydifference a
A1N5 (90,90)C20.0
A2N2 (180,90)C211.4
A3N3 (180,180)C119.8
A4N6 (90,180)C239.3

a kcal mol–1.

Table 2. Optimized isomers for [Fe2(μ-O)(edda)2(H2O)2].
NoIsomerPoint GroupEnergydifference a
B1cis-α,δδ,P,90°C20.0
B2cis-α,δδ,P,270°C26.6
B3cis-α,δλ,P,90°C19.0
B4cis-β,δδ,Q,90°C212.6
B5cis-β,δδ,P,270°C214.7
B6cis-β,δλ,P,180°C122.4
B7cis-β,δδ,Q,0°C126.4
B8cis-β,δλ,Q,0°C129.1
B9trans,δλ,QC132.8
B10cis-β,δλ,Q,180°C133.1
B11cis-β,δδ,Q,270°C234.6
B12cis-β,δλ,Q,180°C135.5
B13trans,δδ,QC239.5
B14cis-α,δλ,P,180°Ci49.5

a kcal mol–1.

Table 3. Optimized isomers for [Fe2(μ-O)(ida)2(H2O)4].
NoIsomerPoint GroupEnergydifference a
C1fac, 90°,sab,C20.0
C2mer, 180°,C111.4
C3mer, 90°,anc,C211.4
C4mer, 180°,C211.8
C5mer, 90°,syd,C211.9
C6fac, 90°,mie,C112.5
C7mer, 180°,C115.7
C8fac, 90°,mie,C116.1
C9fac, 180°,C118.8
C10fac, 90°,sab,C219.6
C11mer, 90°,syd,C123.2
C12fac, 90°,sab,C225.8

a kcal mol–1.

b Two ligands have the same structure.

c Two ligands' amine hydrogen atoms are in anti positions.

d Two ligands' amine hydrogen atoms are in syn positions.

e Two ligands are in the mirror image.

Table 4. Optimized isomers for [Fe2(μ-O)(pac)2(H2O)2].
NoIsomerPoint GroupEnergydifference a
D1mer(180,0,180)C20.0
D2fac(90,180,90),sabC25.0
D3mer(180,180,180)Ci5.8
D4mer(90,0,90)C211.4
D5fac(180,0,90),sabC213.9
D6fac(180,90,90),micCi14.5
D7fac(90,90,90),micC120.7
D8fac(90,90,90),sabC225.8
D9fac(90,180,90),micCi35.9

a kcal mol–1.

b Two ligands have the same structure.

c Two ligands are in the mirror image.

Table 5. Dihedral angles O-Fe···Fe-O for intact isomers and H2O2-adducts.
NoIntact isomeraH2O2-adductb
A168.8°35.3°
B1104.2°34.0°
C159.1°32.4°
D1106.9°c

a The O(water)-Fe···Fe-O(water) angle.

b The O(H2O2)-Fe···Fe-O(H2O2) angle for the most stable isomer.

c The structure was not obtained.

References
 
© 2015 Society of Computer Chemistry, Japan
feedback
Top