Translated Abstract
While some artists feel threatened by AI that generates works of art such as novels, paintings, and musical compositions, others see great potential in using generative AI as a tool to perpetually present works that embody their unique authorship. This paper aims to provide concrete examples of how generative AI stimulates the creativity of experts and the kinds of narratives it can evoke. The analysis focuses on interviews with a commercial cartoonist and a digital artist, respectively, in which they shared their impressions, differences from their authorship, and potential applications when confronted with the image generation AI trained on their own works and the illustrations it generated. By categorizing the statements from these interviews, two categories emerged: “authorship as qualitative calculations” and “authorship as a manifestation of ties to generative AI.” The study demonstrates that organizing a field in which artists engage with generative AI based on different criteria and calculations fosters a dialogue that relativizes and reexamines authorship from multiple perspectives. Additionally, it reveals that in the collaboration between the artifact and the artist the perception of authorship is transformed, as authorship is creatively expressed and they inspire each other.
References
- AbuMusab, S. (2023). Generative AI and human labor: Who is replaceable? AI & SOCIETY. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01773-3
- Bakhtin, M. M. (1929). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Priboy. (バフチン, M. 桑野 隆 (訳) (2013). ドストエフスキーの創作の問題：付：「より大胆に可能性を利用せよ」 平凡社)
- Hirwani, P., Parkel, I., & Murray, T. (2023). SAG strike news: Universal studios accused of pruning trees to remove shade for picketing actors and writers. The Independent. Retrieved May 22, 2024, from https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/sag-strike-2023-latest-news-b2377826.html
- Hu, E., Shen, Y., Wallis, P., Allen-Zhu, Z., Li, Y., Wang, S., Wang, L., & Chen, W. (2021). LoRA: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.09685
- Illich, I. (1973). Tools for conviviality. Harper & Row. (イリイチ, I. 渡辺 京二・渡辺 梨佐 (訳) (1989). コンヴィヴィアリティのための道具 日本エディタースクール出版部)
- 井上 智洋 (2023). AI 失業：生成 AI は私たちの仕事をどう奪うのか？ SB クリエイティブ
- 石黒 千晶・横地 早和子・岡田 猛 (編) (2023). 触発するアート・コミュニケーション：創造のための鑑賞ワークショップのデザイン あいり出版
- Kinder, M. (2024). Hollywood writers went on strike to protect their livelihoods from generative AI. Their remarkable victory matters for all workers. Brookings Institution. Retrieved May 22, 2024, from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/hollywood-writers-went-on-strike-to-protect-their-livelihoods-from-generative-ai-their-remarkable-victory-matters-for-all-workers/
- 久保 明教 (2020). テクノロジーと情動：現代将棋における機械と人間 西井 凉子・箭内 匡 (編) アフェクトゥス(情動)：生の外側に触れる (pp. 301–318) 京都大学出版会
- 松田 素二 (2021). 現代世界における生の技法/哲学としての集合的創造性：コンヴィヴィアルな人間学のために 松田 素二 (編) 集合的創造性：コンヴィヴィアルな人間学のために (pp. 1–33) 世界思想社
- 岡部 大介・大谷 紀子 (2019). アーティストと人工知能技術の協働作曲にみる創造と省察 質的心理学研究, 18, 61–75. https://doi.org/10.24525/jaqp.18.1_61
- 岡田 猛・縣 拓充 (2020). 芸術表現の創造と鑑賞，およびその学びの支援 教育心理学年報, 59, 144–169. https://doi.org/10.5926/arepj.59.144
- Penn, J. (2021a). Co-writing with artificial intelligence with Yudhanjaya Wijeratne. The Creative Penn. Retrieved May 22, 2024, from https://www.thecreativepenn.com/2021/01/18/co-writing-with-artificial-intelligence-yudhanjaya/
- Penn, J. (2021b). Writing fiction with AI. Sudowrite with Amit Gupta. The Creative Penn. Retrieved May 22, 2024, from https://www.thecreativepenn.com/2021/06/25/writing-fiction-with-ai-sudowrite-with-amit-gupta/
- Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., & Ommer, B. (2022). High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 10684–10695. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01042
- 田島 充士・古屋 憲章 (2018). 教育実践を理解するためのバフチン・ダイアローグ論：豊かな異文化交流の実現 言語文化教育研究, 16, 260–278. https://doi.org/10.14960/gbkkg.16.260
- 若月 玲之・平綿 素望・大谷 紀子 (2024). StableDiffusion による作家性が再現された画像の生成 東京都市大学横浜キャンパス情報メディアジャーナル, 25, 6–11.
