2025 年 32 巻 3 号 p. 329-338
This article explores the cognitive potential of “indeterminacy,” its relationship with adversity, and its empirical testability. It begins by revisiting the notion of “quasi-magical thinking,” illustrating how indeterminacy can underlie the belief that one’s actions and decisions may influence others and the world. The discussion then incorporates empirical findings from quantum probabilistic modeling, cognitive experiments, and neuroscience, highlighting new directions and a broader scope for cognitive research.