日本金属学会誌
Online ISSN : 1880-6880
Print ISSN : 0021-4876
ISSN-L : 0021-4876
鋼の低温域における硬さと引張応力および衝撃値との対応性
迎 静雄藤原 諒芹野 正幸
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー

1977 年 41 巻 2 号 p. 136-142

詳細
抄録

Up to the present, there are many investigations on the temperature dependences of mechanical properties of steels at low temperatures. However, the temperature dependences have been divided into three or four regions by merely thinking of the deformation mechanisms which depend on wavy slip or twinning. As a result, there are unsolved problems such as considerations of the differences in expressive equation and in strain rate and the application of dislocation theory.
In this study, the correlativity between temperature dependences on Vickers hardness, the tensile properties and the impact energy for several kinds of commercial steels was examined, and some considerations were given to the deformation mechanism in each region.
\ oindentThe results obtained are as follows:
(1) σ0.2% vs T1⁄2 curve and V* vs T1⁄2 curve consist of three straight lines whose gradients change at the temperatures TT0, TT1 and TV*0, TV*1. Each region of the three straight lines are named Regions I, II and III, respectively. Region I corresponds to the athermal deformation field, Region II to the cross slip field, and Region III to the Peierls deformation field.
(2) While, both Hv vs T1⁄2 curve and logHv vs 1⁄T curve have four straight lines, i.e., Regions, I, II, III and IV. Region IV is considered to correspond to the twinning deformation field.
(3) The correspondence between the mutation temperatures HT0 and HT1 in the logHv vs 1⁄T curve and VT1 and VT2 in the logE vs 1⁄T curve is very good for the case of 1⁄HT0 vs 1⁄VT1 and 1⁄HT1 vs 1⁄VT2 and the correspondence between the transition temperature VTrE or VTrS in the impact test and HT0 or HT1 is better at 1⁄VTrE or 1⁄VTrS vs 1⁄HT1.

著者関連情報
© 社団法人 日本金属学会
前の記事 次の記事
feedback
Top