Article ID: 45089
This study developed and evaluated the Japanese version of the Computational Thinking Scales(JCTS). In addition, we investigated the gender differences and features of CT. In Study 1, a survey of first-year university students in humanities(N = 511) showed that JCTS had not enough but acceptable internal consistency(α = .65〜.92)and criterion related validity(ISTA and CSTA : r = .69(p <.01), CAS : r = .54(p <.01)) that it consisted of 21 items with five factors : Creativity, Cooperativity, Algoritmic Thinking, Critical Thinking, Problem Solving. In Study 2, a test-retest of university students(N = 20)had good reliability for JCTS. In Study 3, a survey of university students (N = 127) showed acceptable internal consistency(α = .77〜.93). Results of this study indicated that JTCS had acceptable reliability and validity. Additionally, CT of first-year university students in humanities showed no significant gender differences and was categorized into 3 clusters.