In today's social environment, there is a movement toward strengthening regulatory enforcement for controlling corporate crime. In achieving that goal, perhaps one expects attention to be given to criminal sanctions. But, are criminal sanctions truly effective? If not, what is the cause? If criminal sanctions do work, what is the reason for their success? Thus, the author of this article has examined regulatory enforcement for controlling corporate crime, and has proposed that at least in general criminal sanctions do not work as an immediate deterrent to corporate crime. Moreover, the author's concern is what are effective methods for controlling corporate crime. Thus, this article examines theoretically regulatory enforcement strategies for controlling corporate crime. The author tries to analyze the shift of regulatory enforcement strategies for controlling corporate crime from "Re-active Regulation" to "Pro-active Regulation", that is, "Direct Government Regulation" to "Enforced Self-Regulation" and "Indirect Regulation".
