抄録
This paper reports the results of a multi-instructor evaluation of a newspaper article summary exercise conducted in the first class of the course. The evaluation points were decided among the teachers to be "elements", "structure" and "expressions". In terms of structure, the teachers' written summaries had the same information at the beginning and end, suggesting that there was a common "recommended structure" for the summary. For better summaries, it is necessary to not only list up individual points but also to construct it so that the logic is reflected in the output. This indicates the need for exercises to focus on all facets of "elements", "structure", and "expression"．
