訂正日: 2006/08/29訂正理由: -訂正箇所: 引用文献情報訂正内容: Wrong : 1) Cf. I. Gelfand: C. R. URSS, 25 (1939), 713-718 and N. Dunford-I. E. Segal: Bullet. Amer. Math. Soc, 52 (1946), 911-914. 2) According to N. Dunford and I. E. Sepal's paper referred to in 1), E. Hille (Proc, Nat. Acad. Sci., 28 (1942), 175-178, 421-424 obtained the representation Uix=lim<n→∞> exp (tn(U1/n-I))x. Hille's parer is not available to the author. 3) The question of the characterization of A together with differentiability of Ui is proposed to the author by Dr. K. Ito in connection with his theory of stochastic differential equations. See his forthcoming paper in Jap. J. of Math. 4) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sei., 16 (1930), 172-175. See also J. von Neumann: Ann. of Math., 33 (1932), 567-573. Proofs of Stone's theorem are given by many authors: F. Riesz, B. von Sz. Nagy and II. Nakano. 5) S. Bochner: Fund. Math., 20 (1933), 262-276. G. Birkhoff: Trans. Amer. Math Soc. 38 (1935), 357-378. I. Gelfand: Commun. Inst. Sci, Math. et Mech. Univ. Kharkoff, 13 (1936), 35-40. B. J. Pettis: Trans. Amer. Meth. Soc., 44 (1938), 277-304. 6) In the case of Stone's theorem, we may replace (1•3) by the separability of { Uix;-∞<t<∞} and the weak measurability of Ui. This may be carried out by virtue of N. Dunford's theorem in Ann. of Math., 39 (1938), 567-573. This fact is, however, already proved by J. von Neumann in another way. See his paper referred to in 4).
Right : 1) Cf. I. Gelfand: C. R. URSS, 25 (1939), 713-718 and N. Dunford-I. E. Segal: Bullet. Amer. Math. Soc, 52 (1946), 911-914. 2) According to N. Dunford and I. E. Segal's paper referred to in 1), E. Hille (Proc, Nat. Acad. Sci., 28 (1942), 175-178, 421-424 obtained the representation Utx=limn→∞ exp (tn(U1/n-I))x. Hille's parer is not available to the author. 3) The question of the characterization of A together with differentiability of Ut is proposed to the author by Dr. K. Itô in connection with his theory of stochastic differential equations. See his forthcoming paper in Jap. J. of Math. 4) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 16 (1930), 172-175. See also J. von Neumann: Ann. of Math., 33 (1932), 567-573. Proofs of Stone's theorem are given by many authors: F. Riesz, B. von Sz. Nagy and H. Nakano. 5) S. Bochner: Fund. Math., 20 (1933), 262-276. G. Birkhoff: Trans. Amer. Math Soc. 38 (1935), 357-378. I. Gelfand: Commun. Inst. Sci, Math. et Mech. Univ. Kharkoff, 13 (1936), 35-40. B. J. Pettis: Trans. Amer. Meth. Soc., 44 (1938), 277-304. 6) In the case of Stone's theorem, we may replace (1·3) by the separability of { Uix;-∞<t<∞} and the weak measurability of Ui. This may be carried out by virtue of N. Dunford's theorem in Ann. of Math., 39 (1938), 567-573. This fact is, however, already proved by J. von Neumann in another way. See his paper referred to in 4).