Latest Clinical Evidence and Operative Strategy for Small-Sized Lung Cancers

Abstract

Many thoracic surgeons revealed that consolidation tumor ratio or solid component size on thin-section computed tomography has been considered more prognostic than maximum tumor size in non-small cell lung cancer (NCSLC). According to the results, the 8^th TNM classification drastically changed the staging system, i.e., clinical T category was determined based on the invasive or solid component size excluding a ground-glass opacity (GGO). However, several debates are arising over the application of radiological solid size for the clinical T staging. Meanwhile, recent several institutional reports have noticed a significantly simple fact that the presence of a GGO denotes an influence on the favorable prognosis of NSCLC. More important, radiologic pure-solid lung cancers without a GGO exhibit more malignant behaviors with regard to both the clinical and pathological aspects, and show several histologic types that have a poorer prognosis than radiologic part-solid lung cancer. In contrast, favorable prognostic impact of the presence of a GGO component was demonstrated, which was irrespective of the solid component size in cases in which the tumor showed a GGO component. Recently, this concept has been gradually noticed on a nationwide level.

Obvious distinctions regarding the several baseline characteristics between the tumor with/without GGO component is a fundamental biological feature of early-stage lung cancer, which would result in a big difference in prognosis, modes of recurrence, overall behavior, and appropriate operative strategies. As a future perspective, the presence or absence of a GGO should be considered as an important parameter in the next clinical T classification.