Abstract
目的:非感染症疾患の重症化予防や管理においてプライマリ・ケアは重要な役割を担っている.Ambulatory care sensitive condition (ACSC)とは適切な外来診療を受ける事で入院を避ける事のできる状態と定義される.プライマリ・ケアに関連した診療報酬上の評価の一つに外来管理加算があるが,外来管理加算を算定した計画的な医学管理が患者の健康に与える影響についてあきらかになっていない.本研究の目的はプライマリ・ケアが行われる診療所において,高齢者に対する外来管理加算を算定する医学管理がACSCによる入院を減らすかどうかを検討することである. 方法:診療所において心不全,高血圧,糖尿病,高脂血症のいずれかに対して,初回の再診から連続して3ヶ月連続で月1回特定疾患療養管理料が算定されている65歳以上の患者を対象とした.外来管理加算を算定した群としていない群で傾向スコアによる1:4マッチングを行い,ACSCによる入院を比較した.主要アウトカムはACSCのうち適切な外来での管理によって避けられる入院(慢性ACSCによる入院)とした. 結果:傾向スコアマッチング後,外来管理加算を算定した群が5,188人,算定していない群が1,297人となった.両群間で,慢性ACSCによる入院に統計的に有意差を認めなかった(1.4% vs. 1.7%, p=0.472). 結論:診療所で心不全,高血圧,糖尿病,高脂血症を治療しているものの安定的な状態にある高齢者に対する外来管理加算による医学管理は,慢性ACSCによる入院と統計的に有意な関連を認めなかった.
Translated Abstract
Objectives: Primary care plays a crucial role in preventing the exacerbation of non-communicable diseases and managing them effectively. Ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) are defined as conditions where hospitalizations can be avoided through appropriate ambulatory care. Although health insurance reimbursement schemes in primary care include a “fee for a comprehensive review on care for outpatients,” the impact of this financial incentive on healthcare outcomes remains unclear. The present study aimed to determine whether this fee schedule was associated with reduction in hospitalizations due to ACSCs primarily treated in clinics. Methods: This study included patients who were i) aged 65 years or older, ii) diagnosed with and treated for heart failure, hypertension, diabetes, or hyperlipidemia, and iii) reimbursed for “fee for medication for the specific lifestyle-related diseases” for three consecutive months from the first follow-up examination in a clinic. We conducted a one-to-four propensity score matching between patients with and without the “fee for a comprehensive review on care for outpatients.” The primary outcome was hospitalizations related to chronic ACSCs that could be prevented with appropriate ambulatory care. Results: The propensity score matched cohort included 5,188 patients with the fee and 1,297 patients without the fee. No significant difference was observed in hospitalizations related to chronic ACSCs (1.4% vs. 1.7%, p=0.472) between the two groups. Conclusion: The incentive scheme was not associated with hospitalizations related to chronic ACSCs among older outpatients with stable conditions who received treatment for either heart failure, hypertension, diabetes, or hyperlipidemia in clinics.
References
- [1] 厚生労働省.国民の健康の増進の総合的な推進を図るための基本的な方針.令和5年5月31日告示,2023. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. [A basic policy for comprehensively advancing the people’s improvement of their health on May 31, 2023] 2023. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/001102474.pdf (in Japanese) (accessed 2024-09-15)
- [2] 厚生労働省.令和4年人口動態統計月報年計(概数)の概況.Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. [Summary of vital statistics monthly report in 2022] 2022. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/jinkou/geppo/nengai22/dl/kekka.pdf (in Japanese)(accessed 2024-09-15)
- [3] 厚生労働省.令和元年国民健康・栄養調査報告.Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. [National Health and Nutrition Survey in 2019] 2019. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/001066903.pdf (in Japanese)(accessed 2024-09-15)
- [4] 厚生労働省.令和2年度国民医療費の概況.Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. [Overview of National medical expenditures in 2020] 2020. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/k-iryohi/20/dl/kekka.pdf (in Japanese)(accessed 2024-09-15)
- [5] Barzegari J, Raeissi P, Hashemi SM, Khesal AA, Reisi N. Delivering primary health care (PHC) services for controlling NCDs during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review. Journal of prevention. 2023;44:579-601. doi:10.1007/s10935-023-00733-3
- [6] World Health Organization. Noncommunicable diseases. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases (accessed 2024-9-15)
- [7] McDarby G, Smyth B. Identifying priorities for primary care investment in Ireland through a population-based analysis of avoidable hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC). BMJ Open. 2019;9(11):e028744. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028744
- [8] Iba A, Tomio J, Abe K, Sugiyama T, Kobayashi Y. Hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions in a large city of Japan: a descriptive analysis using claims data. J Gen Intern Med. 2022;37(15):3917-3924. doi:10.1007/s11606-022-07713-z
- [9] Saijo Y, Yoshioka E, Sato Y. Higher density of primary care facilities is inversely associated with ischemic heart disease mortality, but not with stroke mortality: a Japanese secondary medical service area level ecological count data. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2020;251(3):217-224. doi:10.1620/tjem.251.217
- [10] 厚生労働省.令和4年医療施設(動態)調査.Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. [Survey of medical institutions in 2022] 2022. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/iryosd/22/dl/02sisetu04.pdf (in Japanese)(accessed 2024-09-15)
- [11] Renders CM, Valk GD, Griffin SJ, Wagner EH, Eijk-Van JT, Assendelft WJ. Interventions to improve the management of diabetes in primary care, outpatient, and community settings: a systematic review. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(10):1821-1833. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.10.1821
- [12] Bardsley M, Blunt I, Davies S, Dixon J. Is secondary preventive care improving? observational study of 10-year trends in emergency admissions for conditions amenable to ambulatory care. BMJ Open. 2013;3(1):e002007. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002007
- [13] Kao YH, Lin WT, Chen WH, Wu SC, Tseng TS. Continuity of outpatient care and avoidable hospitalization: a systematic review. The American Journal of Managed Care. 2019; 25(4).e126-e134.
- [14] Abe K, Kawachi I, Iba A, Miyawaki A. In-hospital deaths from ambulatory care-sensitive conditions before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(6):e2319583. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.19583
- [15] Barker I, Steventon A, Deeny SR. Association between continuity of care in general practice and hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: cross sectional study of routinely collected, person level data. BMJ. 2017;356:j84. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j84
- [16] 厚生労働省.診療報酬の算定方法の一部を改正する件(令和6年厚生労働省告示第57号)別表第一.Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. [Revision of calculation method for medical fees in 2024] 2024. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/12404000/001251499.pdf (in Japanese)(accessed 2024-11-25)
- [17] 厚生労働省.診療報酬の算定方法の一部改正に伴う実施上の留意事項について(令和6年3月5日保医発0305第4号)別添1 医科診療報酬点数表に関する事項.Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.[Notes of revision of calculation method for medical fees in 2024] 2024. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/12404000/001293312.pdf (in Japanese)(accessed 2024-11-25)
- [18] 厚生労働省.第7回NDBオープンデータ. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. [The seventh NDB open data in 2022] 2022. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/0000177221_00011.html (in Japanese)(accessed 2024-09-15)
- [19] 厚生労働省.第563回中央社会保険医療協議会総会議事録.Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. [Minutes of central social insurance medical council (No.563) in 2023] 2023. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/shingi2/0000205879_00211.html (in Japanese)(accessed 2024-11-25)
- [20] 岡田啓,康永秀生.DeSC データベースの概要と臨床疫学・薬剤疫学研究への活用.薬剤疫学. 2022;27(1):11-18. Okada A, Yasunaga H. [Overview of the DeSC Database and Utilization for Clinical Epidemiology and Pharmacoepidemiology Research]. Jpn J Pharmacoepidemiol. 2022;27(1):11-18. (in Japanese). doi:10.3820/jjpe.27.11
- [21] 森田和仁,笹渕裕介,佐藤壮,康永秀生.生活習慣病に関する総合的な治療管理が避けられる入院に与える影響:後ろ向きコホート研究.医療経済研究.2024;36(1):68-80. Morita T, Sasabuchi Y, Sato S, Yasunaga H. [Association between comprehensive treatment management for lifestyle-related diseases and avoidable hospitalizations: A retrospective cohort study.] Japanese Journal of Health Economics and Policy. 2024;36(1):68-80. doi:10.24742/jjhep.2024.04 (in Japanese). doi:10.24742/jjhep.2024.04
- [22] Purdy S, Griffin T, Salisbury C, Sharp D. Ambulatory care sensitive conditions: terminology and disease coding need to be more specific to aid policy makers and clinicians. Public Health. 2009;123(2):169-173. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2008.11.001
- [23] Lafrance JP, Rahme E, Iqbal S, Elftouh N, Vallée M, Laurin LP, et al. Association of dialysis modality with risk for infection-related hospitalization: a propensity score–matched cohort analysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;7(10):1598–1605. doi:10.2215/CJN.00440112
- [24] Siyu L, Yuan Y, Rna A, Minyan L. Frailty as tested by the Liver Frailty Index in out-patient patients with cirrhosis in China: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;35(4):440-444. doi:10.1097/MEG.0000000000002502
- [25] Quan H, Li B, Couris CM, Fushimi K, Graham P, Hider P, et al. Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2011;173(6):676–682. doi:10.1093/aje/kwq433
- [26] Mamdani M, Sykora K, Li P, Normand ST, Streiner DL, Austin PC, et al. Reader’s guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 2. assessing potential for confounding. BMJ. 2005;330(7497):960-962. doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7497.960
- [27] Kaneko M, Shimizu S, Oishi A, Fushimi K. Impact of COVID-19 infection rates on admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: nationwide difference-in-difference design in Japan. Fam Med Community Health. 2022;10(4):e001736. doi:10.1136/fmch-2022-001736
- [28] Elder TA, McManus IC, Patrick A, Nair K, Vaughan L, Dacre J. The value of the physical examination in clinical practice: an international survey. Clinical Medicine. 2017;17(6):490–498. doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.17-6-490
- [29] Paley L, Zornitzki T, Cohen J, Friedman J, Kozak N, Schattner A. Utility of clinical examination in the diagnosis of emergency department patients admitted to the department of medicine of an academic hospital. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(15):1393-1400. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.340
- [30] Kelly MA, Freeman LK, Dornan T. Family physicians’ experiences of physical examination. Ann Fam Med. 2019;17(4):304–310. doi:10.1370/afm.2420