Journal of Physical Therapy Science
Online ISSN : 2187-5626
Print ISSN : 0915-5287
ISSN-L : 0915-5287
Original Articles
Comparison of Soft Cervical Collar Versus Cervical-5 Cross-Taping on Cervical Active Range of Motion in Asymptomatic Subjects
Jung Hoon Lee, Kyung Soon Lee, Hyun Mo Koo, Hyun Mo Koo
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2012 Volume 24 Issue 2 Pages 149-151

Details
Abstract
[Purpose] The objective of this study was to compare the active cervical range of motion (CROM) of asymptomatic subjects without orthosis with wearing cervical soft collars or with cervical 5cross-taping. [Subjects] Twenty-three asymptomatic subjects (13 males, 10 females) without neck or shoulder pain agreed to participate in this study. [Methods] The active neck movement (flexion, extension, and left and right rotation and lateral flexion) of the subjects was measured using a CROM instrument without orthosis, while wearing a cervical soft collar, and with cervical-5 cross-taping. [Results] All active neck movements with cervical-5 cross-taping were significantly reduced compared to without orthosis. All active neck movements while wearing soft cervical collars were significantly reduced compared to without orthosis and cervical-5 cross-taping. [Conclusion] These preliminary results suggest that cervical-5 cross-taping using Kinesio tape may allow more active neck movement than soft cervical collars and be more supported than without orthosis.
Content from these authors
© 2012 by the Society of Physical Therapy Science
Next article
feedback
Top