Journal of Physical Therapy Science
Online ISSN : 2187-5626
Print ISSN : 0915-5287
ISSN-L : 0915-5287
Original Article
Pulsed high-intensity laser therapy versus low level laser therapy in the management of primary dysmenorrhea
Ali A. ThabetAnwar A. EbidMohamed E. El-BoshyAfnan O AlmuwalladElham A HudaimoorFatimah E AlsaeediRahaf H. AlsubhiRahaf H. AlmatrookRawan F. AljifrySaja H. AlotaibiShuroq M. AlmallawiWejdan O. Abdulmuttalib
Author information
JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS

2021 Volume 33 Issue 9 Pages 695-699

Details
Abstract

[Purpose] To determine the effect of pulsed high intensity laser therapy (HILT) versus low level laser therapy (LLLT) in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea. [Participants and Methods] This was a randomized clinical trial that included 30 females diagnosed with primary dysmenorrhea who were assigned randomly into two groups of equal numbers. The treatment was three sessions every cycle for three consecutive cycles, where group (A) received pulsed HILT and group (B) received LLLT. All participants were evaluated before and after treatment sessions by visual analogue scale (VAS) and at the end of treatment by pain relief scale (PRS). [Results] The results showed a significant decrease in the severity of pain in the two groups. Comparison between the two groups showed a statistically non-significant difference in the severity of pain and pain alleviation at the end of the treatment course. [Conclusion] Both pulsed HILT and LLLT are effective in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea, with no significant differences between the two modalities.

Content from these authors
© 2021 by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc.

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons [Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International] license.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top