Breeding Science
Online ISSN : 1347-3735
Print ISSN : 1344-7610
ISSN-L : 1344-7610
Research Papers
Translation of continuous artificial selection on phenotype into genotype during rice breeding programs
Kenji FujinoYoshihiro KawaharaKanako O. KoyanagiKenta Shirasawa
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML
Supplementary material

2021 Volume 71 Issue 2 Pages 125-133

Details
Abstract

Understanding genetic diversity among local populations is a primary goal of modern crop breeding programs. Here, we demonstrated the genetic relationships of rice varieties in Hokkaido, Japan, one of the northern limits of rice cultivation around the world. Furthermore, artificial selection during rice breeding programs has been characterized using genome sequences. We utilized 8,565 single nucleotide polymorphisms and insertion/deletion markers distributed across the genome in genotype-by-sequencing for genetic diversity analyses. Phylogenetics, genetic population structure, and principal component analysis showed that a total of 110 varieties were classified into four distinct clusters according to different populations geographically and historically. Furthermore, the genome sequences of 19 rice varieties along with historic representations in Hokkaido, nucleotide diversity and FST values in each cluster revealed that artificial selection of elite phenotypes focused on chromosomal regions. These results clearly demonstrated the history of the selections on agronomic traits as genome sequences among current rice varieties from Hokkaido.

Introduction

DNA markers could facilitate marker-assisted selection (MAS) in practical crop breeding programs. High-density single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) covering the genome could make MAS in local populations with genetically close relationships available using next-generation sequencing (NGS) systems. With these advantages from recent molecular tools, diverse genetic resources can be utilized to improve traits of current varieties by accelerating crop breeding programs. Genetic bases could provide information for breeding and/or adoption of appropriate varieties for stable crop production around the world.

Asian cultivated rice, Oryza sativa L., originated from the tropics (Choi et al. 2017, Fuller 2011, Huang et al. 2012, Yang et al. 2012). Extensive efforts by rice breeding programs have contributed to make rice production possible in various climatic conditions at latitudes ranging between 53°N and 40°S (Fujino et al. 2019a, Lu and Chang 1980). Little is known such wide adaptability in rice. Hokkaido (41–45°N latitude) is the northern-most region of Japan and one of the northern limits of rice cultivation around the world. The unique adaptability of rice varieties in Hokkaido may have been established 200–300 years ago (Fujino et al. 2019a). Today, rice production in Hokkaido is a significant contributor to agriculture in Japan (Fujino et al. 2019c).

Previously, we collected rice landraces from Hokkaido as the Hokkaido Landrace Rice Panel (HLP), which was genetically distinct from varieties from other regions of Japan (Fujino et al. 2019a). The genetic population structure of varieties from Hokkaido was different to those from other regions in Japan in phylogenetic analyses using populations across Japan (Fujino et al. 2019a, Nagasaki et al. 2010, Yamamoto et al. 2010, Yonemaru et al. 2012). Therefore, current rice breeding programs in Hokkaido have focused on good eating quality for the market in Japan as same as those in other regions (Fujino et al. 2019c). Furthermore, genetic bases have shifted four times during rice breeding programs in Hokkaido (Fujino et al. 2015, Shinada et al. 2014). The shifts successfully achieved the phenotypes to meet current human demands (Fujino et al. 2017, 2019c).

The rice genome of a japonica rice variety Nipponbare has been completely sequenced (IRGSP 2005). Furthermore, genome sequences of 3,000 accessions have been registered and accelerated rice functional genomics (Fuentes et al. 2019, Wang et al. 2018). The genetic base in historical processes since rice domestication may shape rice breeding programs. However, little is known about genes for rice improvements originate in rice breeding programs. NGS technologies can elucidate genome-wide variation patterns and the transmission patterns during rice breeding programs. We may have more concern for genes for agronomic traits.

Although the uniqueness of the adaptability and genetic population structure in rice varieties from Hokkaido has been characterized (Fujino 2003, Fujino and Sekiguchi 2005a, 2005b, 2008, Fujino et al. 2013, 2015, 2017, 2019a, 2019b, 2019c, Fujino and Ikegaya 2020, Nonoue et al. 2008, Shinada et al. 2014), it is unclear whether artificial selection has shaped the genome sequence depending on phenotypes during current rice breeding programs in Hokkaido (Fujino et al. 2019c). Here, we demonstrated the genetic relationships of current varieties bred in Hokkaido with Koshihikari, a famous rice cultivar in Japan (Kobayashi et al. 2018). Furthermore, the genomes of 19 rice varieties from rice breeding programs in Hokkaido were re-sequenced. We were able to perform genetic characterization of the rice varieties in Hokkaido with genetically close relationships. The results in this study provide understanding of the genomes for rice improvement and provides insights into molecular events in rice breeding programs in the local population in Hokkaido, Japan.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials

To elucidate the characteristics of the current varieties in rice breeding programs, a total of 110 rice varieties in different populations, both geographically and historically, were used for genetic population structure analysis (Table 1, Supplemental Table 1). We used panels of local varieties, which have already been successfully used to characterize their genetic diversity: the Hokkaido Landraces Panel (HLP) (Fujino et al. 2019a) and Hokkaido Rice Core Panel (HRCP) (Fujino et al. 2015, 2017, Shinada et al. 2014). In addition, 14 varieties bred in 1990–2010 in rice breeding programs in Hokkaido were used as current varieties, CV01–14. As references, eight varieties of ancestral-type rice varieties in Japan, AJ1-01 to AJ1-08, were used. Also, the genome sequence data of eight varieties of KSH including Koshihikari and its progenies (WGS06-14), and Japanese landraces (WGS01–05) in the DRA/DDBJ were used (Table 1, Supplemental Table 1) (Arai-Kichise et al. 2011, 2014).

Table 1. Rice varieties from different populations used in this study
Population Number of varieties Dataset
Name Abbreviation
Hokkaido Landrace HL 49 GBS
Hokkaido Rice Core Panel HRCP 25 GBS
Current Varieties from Hokkaido CV 14 GBS
Ancestors in Japan 1 AJ1 8 GBS
Koshihikari and its progenies KSH 9 WGS
Ancestors in Japan 2 AJ2 5 WGS

GBS; genotyping by sequencing, WGS; whole genome sequence.

HRCP was collected in Shinada et al. (2014).

WGS in AJ2 is cited from Arai-Kichise et al. (2011, 2014).

All varieties in this table are listed in Supplemental Table 1.

Furthermore, 19 rice varieties in the HRCP were re-sequenced (Table 2). In addition, the genome of a rice variety Cody (JP14658 in Genebank) was sequenced, which may have significant as a parent of exotic germplasm compared with varieties from the rice breeding programs in Hokkaido (Fujino et al. 2019d, Shinada et al. 2014). As references, the genome sequences of Nipponbare and Kasalath were used.

Table 2. Genome sequences used in this study
Variety Origin Year Group Cross combination Raw Mapped Cluster Reference
Number of reads Total reads (Gb) Number of reads Total reads (Gb) Coverage (depth ≥10) (%)
Hinohikari Miyazaki 1986 NA Koganebare/Koshihikari 220,459,074 22.3 215,336,872 20.6 97.4 KSH This study
Hitomebore Miyagi 1988 NA Koshihikari/Hatsuboshi 230,535,534 23.3 225,153,018 21.5 97.3 KSH This study
Koshihikari Fukui 1953 NA Norin No. 22/Norin No. 1 223,469,594 22.6 218,562,790 20.9 97.4 KSH This study
Nipponbare Aichi 1961 NA Yamabiko/Tyushin 110 212,945,738 21.5 209,177,192 19.9 98.9 KSH This study
Genkitukushi Fukuoka 2008 NA Tsukusiroman/Tsukushiwase 240,218,816 24.3 234,814,390 22.4 97.5 KSH This study
Tenkomori Toyama 2004 NA Toyama No. 36/Tokei 1000 228,077,352 23.0 222,836,763 21.3 97.8 KSH This study
Tentakaku Toyama 2000 NA Hanaechizen/Hitomebore 230,871,728 23.3 225,500,806 21.6 97.7 KSH This study
Hokkaiwase Hokkaido Landrace I NA 174,234,132 17.4 166,955,908 16.0 84.0 NA This study
Akage Hokkaido Landrace I NA 224,213,548 22.4 218,308,372 20.9 85.3 EA This study
Hayayuki Hokkaido 1968 II Shinei/Norin No. 19 148,750,100 14.9 140,780,310 13.5 88.1 EA This study
Shinei Hokkaido 1951 II Tomoenishiki/Norin No. 20 170,673,592 17.1 163,652,903 15.7 86.2 EA This study
Kyouwa Hokkaido 1941 IIIa Rikuu No. 132/Wasefukoku 163,908,840 16.4 155,670,385 14.9 87.9 EA This study
Sorachi Hokkaido 1967 IIIa Kuiku No. l2/Mimasari 165,631,110 16.6 156,952,918 15.0 86.5 MD This study
Wasefukoku Hokkaido 1936 IIIa Nakateaikoku/Bozu No. 6 185,473,688 18.5 178,854,475 17.1 88.4 EA This study
Hakutyoumochi Hokkaido 1989 IIIb Joikumochi No. 381/Onnemochi 148,074,464 14.8 133,999,192 12.7 89.4 MD This study
Shimahikari Hokkaido 1981 IIIb Koshihomare/Sorachi 193,008,254 19.3 186,246,819 17.9 83.0 MD This study
Yukara Hokkaido 1962 IIIb Kanto No. 53/Eiko 177,269,508 17.7 171,655,969 16.5 82.5 MD This study
Honoka 224 Hokkaido 1990 IV Toiku No. 214/Kuiku No. 110//Kuiku No. 114 156,454,666 15.6 150,670,656 14.5 86.5 MD This study
Nourin No. 15 Hokkaido 1940 IV Ginbozu/Hashiribozu 195,023,616 19.5 188,587,725 18.1 87.2 MD This study
Daichinohoshi Hokkaido 2003 V Kuiku No. 151/Hoshinoyume 157,379,584 15.7 134,127,993 12.8 88.8 DV Fujino and Ikegaya 2020
Fukkurinko Hokkaido 2003 V Kukei 90242B/Hoshinoyume 164,143,152 16.4 154,336,174 14.8 86.6 DV This study
Hoshinoyume Hokkaido 1996 V Akitakomachi/Dohoku No. 48//Kirara 397 153,358,932 15.3 144,499,239 13.7 90.0 DV Fujino et al. 2018
Kirara 397 Hokkaido 1988 V Toiku No. 214/Dohoku No. 36 180,014,622 18.0 159,758,190 15.3 90.1 DV This study
Kitaake Hokkaido 1983 V Eikei 7361/Dohoku No. 5 151,800,222 13.7 147,583,031 12.6 94.8 DV Fujino et al. 2015
Nanatsuboshi Hokkaido 2001 V Hitomebore/Kukei 90242A//Kuiku No. 150 204,076,874 20.4 182,756,005 17.4 88.5 DV This study
Kitakurin Hokkaido 2014 V Fukei No. 187/Kuiku No. 162//Fukkurinko 183,797,896 18.4 174,908,890 16.8 88.0 DV Fujino et al. 2018
Cody NA NA NA NA 139,565,130 14.1 136,198,559 13.3 94.1 NA This study
Kasalath NA NA NA NA 238,066,444 24.0 220,632,717 21.0 88.2 NA This study

NA; not available.

Groups I–V indicate the genetical population structure in rice varieties from Hokkaido (Shinada et al. 2014).

Clusters are defined by SNPs in Fig. 3 in this study.

Seeds of rice varieties were provided by the Genebank of NARO (Tsukuba, Japan) and the Local Independent Administrative Agency Hokkaido Research Organization Hokkaido Central Agricultural Experiment Station (Takikawa, Japan).

Full methods, including DNA analysis, Genotype-by-sequencing (GBS), and Whole-genome sequencing (WGS), are available in the Supplemental Text, and these were carried out using standard procedures as described previously. Sequence data from this article have been deposited in the EMBL/GenBank Databases under accession numbers DRA008936, DRA006061, and DRA008447.

Results

Genetic population structure of rice varieties

A total of 290.0 million reads, 29.0 Gb, from 96 rice accessions were sequenced by GBS. The mean was 3.0 million reads per variety. A total of 110 varieties, 96 GBS and 14 WGS, were used for phylogenetic analysis. After filtering, 8,565 polymorphisms including SNPs/insertions/deletions were obtained (Supplemental Table 2, Supplemental Fig. 1). A dendrogram clearly showed that there were the four clusters, A–D (Fig. 1). The four clusters corresponded well with the four populations obtained with K = 3 in STRUCTURE analysis (Fig. 1). Cluster A involved 11 varieties each from group V in the HRCP and CV. Cluster B was divided into two sub-clusters, B1 and B2. B2 involved seven varieties from Koshihikari and its progenies (KSH), whereas B1 involved 12 varieties from AJ1 and AJ2 and a landrace in Hokkaido, Sakatawase. Most of the HL varieties were divided into two major clusters, C and D. Among 33 varieties in cluster C, 32 were in the HL. Cluster D had 32 varieties, which showed the genome of admixture-type combined HL with rice varieties in the HRCP (Fig. 1, Supplemental Table 1).

Fig. 1.

Classification of 110 rice varieties from different populations with a dendrogram and population structures (K = 3) using the 8,565 markers. Bars in the bottom indicate the classifications as clusters A–D.

PCA corresponded well with the four clusters in the phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 2). The first and second components in PCA explained 18.16% and 10.03% of the total variation, respectively (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Principle component analysis (PCA) using genotypes with the 8,565 markers. Clusters A–D correspond to the classification from the phylogenetic analyses in Fig. 1.

Genome sequences of the varieties

Next, we focused on sequence variation over the genome among 29 rice varieties including 19 varieties from Hokkaido. A total of 5.2 billion pair-end reads (526.5 Gb) was sequenced (Table 2). Using filtering for read quality, 2,923,374 SNPs were obtained.

A UPGM dendrogram showed that there were four distinct clusters corresponding to historical and geographical differentiation (Fig. 3). Clusters early (EA) and middle (MD) involved six and five varieties in the HRCP, respectively. Cluster developed (DV) consisted of seven varieties in the HRCP. Whereas cluster Koshihikari (KSH), including Nipponbare and six varieties of the Koshihikari family, was clearly distinguished from the other clusters. Nipponbare, which is a reference variety in rice research, was grouped into the cluster KSH including Koshihikari. Kasalath, which is an aus rice variety, was distinct from the rice varieties in Japan. In addition, Hokkaiwase and Cody were distinct from the rice varieties in Japan.

Fig. 3.

Classifications of rice varieties by genome sequence variation. SNP density over the genome. The density is expressed for each 1.0 Mb chromosomal region referenced with IRGSP 1.0. (A, B) heat map combined the number of SNPs (lower panel) with distance (upper panel) calculated in Tassel. Values in Supplemental Table 3 are visualized as color intensity. (C) Phylogenetic tree. Kasalath is an aus variety. Hokkaiwase was classified into the cluster of varieties with upland habits (Fujino et al. 2019a). Zoom up the branch of the tree for rice varieties from Japan. (D) 3-D plots of PCA. All varieties were classified into four groups corresponding for the three clusters in Fig. 1, EA (red), MD (green), and DV (blue) with the reference KSH (white).

A heat map was constructed using the number of SNPs and genetic distance among varieties (Fig. 3A, 3B, Supplemental Table 3). PCA using 3-d eigenvectors corresponded to the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 3D, Supplemental Table 4). The genetic groups explained 44.6% of the SNP variation in three principal components. The first, second, and third components capturing 19.4%, 16.2%, and 9.1% of variation, respectively.

All phylogenetic approaches concluded that there were three distinct clusters in the Hokkaido rice population along with the historical generations comprising varieties bred between 1936 and 1968 as cluster EA, 1940 and 1981 as cluster MD, and 1983 and 2014 as cluster DV (Fig. 3D).

Variations in genome sequences among rice varieties

To evaluate the advances in current varieties in rice breeding programs in Hokkaido, cluster DV, FST compared between the clusters showed the similarity of genome sequences (Table 3). FST between clusters EA and MD ranged from 0.021 on chromosome 6 to 0.566 on chromosome 12. Whereas, higher FST was detected between clusters MD and DV. FST on chromosome was 0.732. Furthermore, 47 1K-SNP-windows showed a high FST value >0.75. These results suggested that selection on chromosome 2 was intense in the genetic phase change from cluster MD to cluster DV.

Table 3. Variation in FST between the clusters over the genome
Chromosome Number of SNPs Number of windows Combination
Clusters EA and MD Clusters MD and DV
Average Number of windows with high FST Average Number of windows with high FST
1 250,089 250 0.228 1 0.341 5
2 204,069 204 0.133 0 0.732 47
3 213,558 213 0.199 0 0.138 2
4 178,841 178 0.242 0 0.153 0
5 179,616 179 0.186 2 0.156 2
6 185,894 185 0.021 0 0.350 12
7 165,683 165 0.273 11 0.325 14
8 167,268 167 0.224 0 0.215 0
9 133,496 133 0.184 1 0.336 3
10 151,804 151 0.231 0 0.073 0
11 161,669 161 0.200 0 0.208 0
12 139,365 139 0.566 27 0.198 0

High FST indicates >0.75.

Window shows 1K-SNP-window.

SNP distribution

Among 2,923,374 SNPs in the 29 varieties, 2,353,560 (80.5%) were located in intergenic regions and 569,432 (19.5%) were in coding regions (Supplemental Fig. 2, Table 4). The distributions of SNPs showed cluster specificities; 288 high-impact SNPs were conserved among the three clusters (EA, MD, and DV) in rice breeding programs in Hokkaido. Only 343 SNPs with high impact were shared among all four clusters, which are likely to play an important role in rice cultivation in Japan.

Table 4. Characterization of SNPs
Area Distribution on the clusters No. of SNPs
EA and MD DV KSH Intergenic Genic
Impact of SNPs
High Moderate Low Modifier
1 P P P 108,165 343 3,259 3,183 21,722
2 P P A 112,184 288 2,761 2,787 21,492
3 A P P 10,812 35 295 393 3,618
4 P A P 27,737 90 936 917 5,961
5 P A A 141,798 329 3,638 3,495 27,447
6 A A P 35,471 94 909 1,045 7,677
7 A P A 30,360 52 675 666 5,598
8 A A A 1,891,353 3,955 38,936 42,782 365,002

AREA is shown as figure in Supplemental Fig. 2.

P and A indicate the presence/absence of SNPs in AREAs.

SNPs under selection

To elucidate the role of Cody as exotic germplasm for rice breeding programs in Hokkaido local populations, the genome sequences of seven varieties in cluster DV (Supplemental Fig. 3) were compared with that of Cody (Fig. 4, Table 5). The Kitaake SNPs were present ranging from 31.4% in the Daichinohoshi genome to 51.0% in the Hoshinoyume genome (Supplemental Fig. 4, Table 5). Among them, 13,927 SNPs in Fukkurinko to 14,673 SNPs in Kirara397 were shared with Cody, which were located on chromosome 2 (Fig. 4, Table 5).

Fig. 4.

“Cody” SNPs in varieties of cluster DV. SNPs common to Cody are visualized with a transparency parameter of 0.01, which are highlighted in regions with high-density SNPs. (Top to bottom), All, Daichinohoshi, Fukkurinko, Hoshinoyume, Kirara397, Kitaake, Nanatsuboshi, and Kitakurin. Boxes indicate the chromosomes in rice, chr01–chr12. “All” shows common SNPs among the seven varieties.

Table 5. Impact of Kitaake on the current rice varieties
Variety No. of SNPs “Kitaake” SNPs “Cody” SNPs
Number % Number %
Daichinohoshi 72,828 22,846 31.4 14,408 63.1
Fukkurinko 49,577 20,197 40.7 13,927 69
Hoshinoyume 40,911 20,883 51 14,288 68.4
Kitakurin 59,686 20,521 34.4 14,211 69.3
Kirara397 36,056 21,838 60.6 14,673 67.2
Nanatsuboshi 54,817 21,443 39.1 14,087 65.7

No. of SNPs shows SNPs different from those of Nipponbare, Koshihikari and Sorachi. Ambiguous sites were removed.

“Kitaake” SNPs are the same as those of Kitaake but different from those of Cody.

“Cody” SNPs are common in Kitaake and Cody.

Discussion

Plant breeding programs have been carried out using selection for desirable phenotypes. Molecular technologies including MAS and NGS may enhance accurate selection based on the genotype for a desirable phenotype. Previously, we identified QTLs/genes responsible for adaptability to Hokkaido (Fujino 2003, Fujino and Sekiguchi 2005a, 2005b, 2008, Fujino et al. 2013, 2019a, 2019b, 2019c, Fujino and Ikegaya 2020, Nonoue et al. 2008). In addition, we demonstrated phenotypic gains in the 100 years of rice breeding programs in Hokkaido (Fujino et al. 2017). Here, we proved the selection of desirable phenotypes has impacted on genome sequences during rice breeding programs in Hokkaido. The gene-based comparison of rice varieties showed they are differentiated both geographically and historically and may elucidate the genome-wide effects of artificial selection.

Genome-wide polymorphisms in this study classified a total of 110 varieties from geographically and historically distinct populations in Japan into four distinct clusters (Figs. 1, 2). The genetic population structure may be consistent with historical society in Japan. In the current rice market in Japan, good eating quality is the major human demand, as evidenced by Koshihikari (Fujino et al. 2019c, Kobayashi et al. 2018). This clustering might be caused by the selection of phenotypes through conventional strategies in rice breeding programs (Fujino et al. 2019c). Genetic relationships among these different populations in Japan may depend on potential admixtures, shared ancestry, or pedigrees of local populations (Figs. 2, 3).

Rice breeding programs in Hokkaido were started from landraces in Hokkaido as ancestors in the early 1900s (Fujino et al. 2019c). The landraces were classified into two clusters, C and D (Fig. 1). Fifteen varieties among the HL population were classified into cluster D, suggesting that they were the founders of rice varieties for rice breeding programs in Hokkaido. They may represent a genetic bottleneck for adaptability to rice cultivation in Hokkaido. Breakthrough of this bottleneck generated in cluster D would reshape rice breeding programs in Hokkaido for human demands in the future (Fujino et al. 2019a, 2019c, Shinada et al. 2014).

Previously, we demonstrated the significance of improvements in agricultural traits in rice breeding programs in Hokkaido (Fujino et al. 2017). The continuous artificial selection on phenotypes during the last 100 years of rice breeding programs in Hokkaido may leave footprints in the genome sequences. Since the early phase of rice breeding programs in Hokkaido, various kinds of traits might have been improved. There may be no signal for intensive selection (Table 4), suggesting that these genes might distributed over the genome. Conversely, since the late 1900s rice, good eating quality with stable production could have been placed under strong selection (Fujino et al. 2017, 2019c). The genome sequences among the rice varieties in group V of HRCP could conserve a region on chromosome 2 from Cody (Fig. 4, Table 4). Cody was utilized as a resource for blast disease resistance in rice breeding programs in Hokkaido at that time. Now, molecular studies could show that the resistance gene has been identified as Pi-cd on chromosome 11 (Fujino et al. 2019d, Shinada et al. 2015). The region of chromosome 2 might have been introgressed when Kitaake was selected as new variety. Then, varieties developed from Kitaake carried this conserved region (Fig. 4, Supplemental Fig. 3), which might establish phenotype in the current varieties.

Combined with our previous work on the unique adaptability of rice at its northern limit of cultivation in Hokkaido, we propose a model for the genetic differentiation of rice populations to meet human demands (Fig. 5, Supplemental Table 5). Rice cultivation started 2,000–3,000 years ago in Japan. Human communities in Japan have subsequently expanded northwards. Rice with extremely early heading date has been selected for rice cultivation in Hokkaido. Then, rice breeding programs aim to use scientific theory to make rice varieties for human demands as agriculture (Fujino et al. 2019c). During this process, tolerance to biotic and abiotic stress has also been improved genetically. Therefore, our study provides new insights and implications for genome-design in practical rice breeding programs.

Fig. 5.

Model of genetic shifts during adaptation to the northern limits of rice cultivation, Hokkaido. Boxes with Japan/Hokkaido indicate the gene pool of local populations. Bolded A–D show the genetic population structure in the GBS analysis in this study. EA, MD, DV, and KSH, shown in bold and italic, indicate the classification of the genetic population structure in the whole genome sequence analysis in this study. The gray arrow shows the flows of genetic diversity during artificial selections. Mutations for local adaptability to Hokkaido, ghd7 and osprr37, generated rice varieties with extremely early heading date (Fujino et al. 2019a).

Author Contribution Statement

Conceived and designed the experiments: KF. Performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the manuscript and approved the final manuscript: KF, YK, KK, and KS.

Acknowledgments

We thank M. Obara (National Agricultural Research Organization) for assistance with DNA experiments, T. Ikegaya (National Agricultural Research Organization) for collecting rice varieties in the HL, and N. Osada (Hokkaido University) for valuable comments. This work was supported in part by a grant from the Iijima Memorial Foundation for the Promotion of Food Science and Technology (to K.F.), the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan (Genomics-based Technology for Agricultural Improvement, PFT-1002, to Y.K.), and the Advanced Analysis Center Research Supporting Program of National Agriculture and Food Research Organization.

Literature Cited
 
© 2021 by JAPANESE SOCIETY OF BREEDING
feedback
Top