Journal of the Society of Materials Science, Japan
Online ISSN : 1880-7488
Print ISSN : 0514-5163
ISSN-L : 0514-5163
Original Papers
Dissipated Energy Evaluation for Austenitic Stainless Steel
Atsushi AKAIDaiki SHIOZAWATakahide SAKAGAMI
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2013 Volume 62 Issue 9 Pages 554-561

Details
Abstract

In recent years, fatigue limit estimation based on dissipated energy is being introduced in various industries because of its time and cost effectiveness. However, the energy dissipation mechanism and the relationship between energy dissipation and fatigue damage have not been well investigated. In the 1st report, the present authors conducted fatigue limit estimation based on dissipated energy measurement and conventional fatigue test for JIS type 304 and 316L austenitic stainless steel. We found that the fatigue limit of the type 316L steel could be precisely estimated, although estimated fatigue limit of the type 304 steel was conservative values compared with that obtained by conventional fatigue tests. It was considered that the fatigue limit estimation method based on dissipated energy could not evaluate the microstructure change, such as dislocation and phase transformation during short cyclic loading. In this study, fatigue tests under the constant stress amplitude were conducted for austenitic stainless steel to investigate the relationship between dissipated energy and microstructure change during fatigue tests. It was found for the type 316L steel that tendency of the observed dissipated energy during the fatigue tests was similar as that of plastic strain energy. On the other hand, for the type 304 steel, the dissipated energy decreased in spite of increasing plastic strain energy around N = 105cycles, when the applied stress amplitude was close to the actual fatigue limit. It is considered from the observation of the change in martensitic volume fraction, the decrease of dissipated energy was caused by the martensitic transformation ; some amount of irreversible plastic strain energy was consumed for phase transformation. It was found from the experimental studies that dissipated energy reflects the microstructure changes, such as material softening, hardening and martensitic phase transformation. Therefore, the condition of the number of cycles in the fatigue limit estimation based on the dissipated energy should be changed depending on the behavior of microstructure change in material under cyclic loading.

Content from these authors
© 2013 by The Society of Materials Science, Japan
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top