歯科薬物療法
Online ISSN : 1884-4928
Print ISSN : 0288-1012
ISSN-L : 0288-1012
急性歯性感染症に対するBMY-28100の臨床評価
Cefaclorを対照とする二重盲検比較試験
佐々木 次郎森鼻 健史植松 正孝椎木 一雄山根 伸夫菅野 直美坂本 春生森島 丘重原 聡佐藤 田鶴子菊池 典久道 健一高橋 浩二南雲 正男吉屋 誠大曽根 洋三上 真塚越 完子山本 忠加納 欣徳河合 幹服部 孝範河合 俊彦藤井 信男小川 暢也出口 浩一
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー

1990 年 9 巻 2 号 p. 96-112

詳細
抄録
The clinical usefulness of BMY-28100, a new oral cephem antibiotic, was compared objectively with that of cefaclor (CCL) using a double-blind method in the department of orofacial odontogenic infections.
A total of 190 patients were administered with the test substances (BMY-28100 and CCL), and the clinical efficacy of 84 patients in the BMY-28100 group and of 83 patients in the CCL group was evaluated. Efficacy rate as evaluated by the score method was 83.3% in the BMY-28100 group and 85.5% in the CCL group.
Efficacy rate as evaluated by the investigators was 82.1% in the BMY-28100 group and 84.3% in the CCL group. The differences between the 2 drug groups were not statistically significant. The organisms were isolated in 64 patients (30 in the BMY-28100 group and 34 in the CCL group), and the difference between the 2 drug groups in these patients was also not statistically significant.
Adverse reactions were observed in 1 patient in the BMY-28100 group and in 4 patients in the CCL group, while abnormal laboratory findings were observed in 2 patients (3 cases) in the BMY-28100 group and in 3 patients (3 cases) in the CCL group. None of these differences was statistically significant.
The usefulness rates were almost the same for the 2 drug groups.
The results indicated that BMY-28100 was almost equal to CCL in utility evaluations in the treatment of orofacial odontogenic infections.
著者関連情報
© 日本歯科薬物療法学会
前の記事 次の記事
feedback
Top