PLOとその問題性-その問題解決アプローチが意味するもの-

非国家的行為体と国際関係

抄録

PLO (Palestinian Liberation Organization) which head the palestinian national liberation struggle is a movement-formation body consisting of Palestinians and has the characteristics of being transnational and having a modern state approach. It is a struggle by Palestinians for the setting up a homeland, however, having lost their soil and they are propagandist Fedayeen of an armed struggle with the slogan of freedom and liberation.
In the arab contexist during the All-Arab Palestine Conference and the General Syrian Congress of 1910, the Palestinian nationalism was rised. However, as a result of the Palestine War in 1948, the palestinians were scattered as the “refugees” and were used as tools by Arab nations for their foreign policies. After, the Palestinian national liberation movement has gone through the following stages.
The 1st Period-In 1951 the Arab National Movement was formed and an awakening and consiousness was born. In 1955 the resistance movement was begun and from 1965 it has been escalating year by year.
The 2nd Period-In September 1963 the Council of Arab League decided that the Arab Nations would take the responsiblity of liberating the Palestinians. In June 1964, during the first Palestine National Council the PLO was established.
The 3rd Period-After the 3rd Arab-Israeli War the Palestinian Fedayeen become the vangard against Israel. In July 1968, the fourth Palestine National Council decided the Guerrilla Warfar of the Peoples' Revolution Strategy. Thus its began the International Internal War.
The 4th Period-Though the conflict in the Arab Nations and their subsequent dealings with these nations, they began to demand the total liberation of the soil of Palestine, their homeland. In the 1971 PLO Constitution, Political Programe for the Conduct of the Palestine Revolution, and the formation of an democratic Palestinian state liberated from Zionist imperialism was taken up.
The 5th Period-In July 1975 the Islam Congress declares its endorsment of opening up offices for PLO, and in January 1977 Egypt and Jordan agreed to coordinate among both countries for the formation of a Palestinian state.
The leading role played by the PLO in International Internal War helped it to confirm its identity and this made the Arab Nations demand the formation of a Palestinian state as a condition for Middle East pease. The PLO is not a state but a movement-formation body, however of late as a transnational actor it has developed a new state within the existing state system. This state would not be the so-called “Establishment” but would rather be based on a community life-style, and with the union of the respective autonomics social and economic interchange would take place, such as a safe community among Jordan, Israel and others. Although this is called a state, it is a completely new kind of state and conditions necessary for making the foundation of this state possible is what I call the third situation. That is the UN should come to grips with the problem of the Palestinian guerrilla and demand a solution throught the state system. On the other hand, the popular movement in Israel should come in contact with the PLO and this solution should be demanded of the Israel Government by transformation and this would bring about overlapping of external and internal dimentions leading to international relations while it make no distinction between peace and war.