社会主義国際関係論と中ソ対立-国際関係認識をめぐって-

中ソ関係と国際環境

抄録

There are many reasons for the Sino-Soviet Conflict. But, I think two factors are more important than others: first, difference in stages of economic development; second, difference in stages of perspectives on international relations related to stages of economic development.
1. From strategy-tactics approach to world order approach
In the first stage Soviet perspective on international relations is imperialism theory. This is strategy-tactics of world revolution. In the second stage its perspective grows to general crisis of capitalism theory. It is composed of the strategy-tactics approach and balance-of- power approach. Balance-of-power approach is based on inter-state relations. In the third stage Khrushchev gives priority to inter-state relations over strategy-tactics approach. But, inter-state relations theory contradicts with the strategy-tactics approach. To deter explosion of its contradiction Brezhnev separates these two elements and sets up double standars. But still the contradiction grows more and more. Therefore, to slove the contradiction Gorbachev gives up the theory of general crisis of capitalism and adopts the world order approach.
2. Four stages of Sino-Soviet relations
After the Peoples Republic of China was established, Sino-Soviet relations went through four stages. The stages are divided by above-mentioned two factors. The first stage is period of Sino-Soviet alliance from establishment of PRC 1949 to the Great Leap Forward policy in 1958. The second stage is the period of Sino-Soviet dispute from the GLF policy to Czech incident in 1968. The third stage is the period of Sino-Soviet conflict from Czech incident and Social-Imperialism theory to four modernizations policy in 1978. And the last stage is the period of Sino-Soviet reconciliation from four modernizations policy to perestroika. From now on since two factors behind Sino-Soviet conflict differences are smaller than before, relations between the Soviet Union and China will improve.