後期シェリング哲学の教育学的意味について
その出会い論を中心にして
1988 年 1988 巻 57 号 p. 54-67
詳細
1988 年 1988 巻 57 号 p. 54-67
In this paper I investigate the progress in Schelling's thought which started with a philosophy of identity (Identitätsphilosophie) and ended up in insisting on the difference between negative philosophy (negative Philosophie) and positive philosophy (positive Philosophie) paying special attention to the change of principles which thus occurred. From the beginning to the end, he continued trying to solve the problem 'How can we recognize the Absolute ?'. At first Schelling thought it was by intellectual intuition that we could recognize it. However as his thought deepened, the appropriateness of intellectual intuition became doubtful to him, and because of the failure of his middle philosophy, finally it was abandoned. Contrary to his early philosophy, in which he had maintained the possiblity of knowing the Absolute, his later philosophy insisted that it is impossible for us to know the Absolute directly. In his later philosophy he adopted ecstasy (Ekstase) as a new principle. Hence, Schelling changed his methodological principle completely during the development of his thought. Therefore, I examine the meaning of this change from an anthropological-pedagogical point of view to arrive at some valuable clues reflecting on the nature of encounter (Begegnung) in educational practice.
