MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS
Online ISSN : 1347-5320
Print ISSN : 1345-9678
ISSN-L : 1345-9678
Express Rapid Publication
A Corrosion Resistant Sintered Stainless Steel: Type 304L Containing Mo-Rich Phases
Haruka SaitoIzumi MutoYu Sugawara
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML

2020 Volume 61 Issue 11 Pages 2248-2251

Details
Abstract

Pure Mo and type 304L stainless steel powders were mixed to form type 304L with 2.5 mass% Mo and were subsequently sintered to fabricate a stainless steel containing Mo-rich phases. After sintering, heat treatments were performed at 1573 K (5 h) and 1373 K (0.5 h). It was confirmed that Mo- and Cr-enriched secondary phases were generated. Potentiodynamic polarization was conducted in 0.1 M NaCl. The pitting potential of the stainless steel containing Mo-rich phases was higher than that of the commercial type 316L sheet (non-sintered steel). The results of this study clearly indicate that the existence of Mo-rich phases in sintered stainless steels improves their pitting corrosion resistance, making them highly suitable for use in chloride environments.

1. Introduction

It is well-known that Mo improves the pitting corrosion resistance of stainless steels.13) This has been mainly attributed to the existence of Mo-species in passive films,2,49) and to the inhibition effect of the dissolved Mo-species.1014) For instance, Montemor et al. proposed that Mo exists as Mo(IV), Mo(VI), and/or metallic Mo in the oxide films on stainless steels.4) Kimura et al. demonstrated that the formation of MoO42− networks near the dissolving metal interface enhances the pitting corrosion resistance of stainless steel.13) There is no unified theory about the role of Mo.

In this study, to derive a new concept for corrosion resistant stainless steels, the steel that contains Mo-rich phases was fabricated by spark plasma sintering,15,16) and its pitting corrosion resistance was measured electrochemically.

2. Experimental

2.1 Specimens

Spark plasma sintering (SPS) was used for the fabrication of type 304L containing Mo-rich phases. Mo powders (particle size: 3–5 µm, 99.9 mass% pure) and gas atomized type 304L powders were used as the starting materials. The chemical composition of the type 304L powders is listed in Table 1. Mo powders were ball-milled for 1 h at 400 rpm. After milling, Mo powders (0.175 g, 2.5 mass%) were mixed with type 304L powders (6.825 g). The mass percentage of the Mo powders was almost the same as the Mo concentration in a conventional type 316L stainless steel. The mixed powders (ca. 7 g) were packed into a cylindrical graphite die (diameter of 15 mm), and the powders were heated in vacuum from room temperature to 1373 K over 20 min and then were maintained at 1373 K for 20 min. After that, the sintered specimens were cooled to room temperature. After sintering, the specimens were heat-treated at 1573 K for 5 h in vacuum and quenched in water. Then, a solution-treatment was conducted at 1373 K for 0.5 h (water quench).

Table 1 Chemical compositions of the specimens.

Sintered types 304L and 316L samples were also fabricated by SPS. Gas-atomized types 304L and 316L powders were used as the starting materials. The chemical composition of type 316L powders is also listed in Table 1. The same SPS procedure was applied. After sintering, only a solution treatment was conducted at 1373 K for 0.5 h (water quench).

The as-sintered specimens had a cylindrical shape. The diameter and thickness were 15 mm and 5 mm, respectively. After the solution heat-treatment, the specimens were sliced in half, and the sliced surfaces were polished down to 1 µm using a diamond paste and were ultrasonically cleaned with ethanol.

As reference materials, commercial types 304 and 316L sheets (non-sintered steels) were used. The chemical compositions of these steels are also listed in Table 1. The solution-treatment was conducted at 1373 K for 0.5 h (water quench). The surfaces of these materials were also polished down to 1 µm using a diamond paste. In this study, the specimens fabricated by SPS were labeled as type 304L (SPS), type 316L (SPS), and type 304L containing Mo-rich phases (SPS) to avoid confusion with non-sintered steels.

2.2 Polarization measurements

Potentiodynamic polarization was conducted in a 0.1 M NaCl solution (pH 6.0) under naturally aerated conditions at 298 K. The scan rate was set at 23 mV min−1. All of the reported potentials are in reference to Ag/AgCl (3.33 M KCl).

2.3 Observations and analysis

The specimens were etched in a mixture of HNO3 and HCl for 30 s, and their microstructures were observed. The as-polished surfaces of the specimens were also analyzed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with an electron probe micro analyzer (EPMA). The acceleration voltage was set at 15 kV.

2.4 X-ray diffraction analysis

Cu-Kα radiation with a Ni-filter was used. Diffraction patterns were collected over a 2θ range of 15–90° with a step width of 0.02°. The scan rate was 1° min−1. The peaks related to Kα2 were subtracted using computer software.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1 Microstructure characterization

The microstructures of the specimens were inspected. Figure 1 shows the optical micrographs of the etched surfaces of type 304L containing Mo-rich phases (SPS) and type 316L (SPS). The many black spots (blue arrows) observed. These spots are the voids formed in the sintering process. Moreover, large round phases can be clearly observed at the positions indicated by the red arrows; these represent the secondary phases. Black spots were also observed on type 316L (SPS), as shown in Fig. 1(b). However, unlike for type 304L containing Mo-rich phases (SPS), no secondary phase was observed on type 316L (SPS). This implies that the Mo in type 316L (SPS) exists uniformly as a solid solution in the steel matrix.

Fig. 1

Optical micrographs of the as-polished surfaces of the specimens fabricated by spark plasma sintering: (a) type 304L containing Mo-rich phases and (b) type 316L.

To determine the composition of the secondary phases, SEM/EPMA analysis was conducted. Figure 2(a) shows SEM image of the as-polished surface of type 304L containing Mo-rich phases (SPS) and the corresponding EPMA maps. Mo-rich areas can clearly be observed in the EPMA maps. The results of EPMA point analysis at points 1 and 2 are summarized in Table 2. At point 1 (Mo-rich area), the relative concentrations of Mo and Cr were 3.2 and 24.2 mass%, respectively. By contrast, the relative concentrations of Mo and Cr at point 2 (Mo-poor area) were 1.7 and 18.4 mass%, respectively. The Mo-rich areas correspond to the secondary phases in Fig. 1(a) and were generated from the Mo powders.

Fig. 2

SEM image and corresponding EPMA maps of the as-polished surfaces of the specimens fabricated by spark plasma sintering: (a) type 304L containing Mo-rich phases and (b) type 316L.

Table 2 Relative concentration at points 1–3 in Fig. 2 (mass%).

Figure 2(b) shows SEM image of the as-polished surface of type 316L (SPS) and the corresponding EPMA maps. Local accumulation was not detected neither for Mo nor for Cr. As listed in Table 2, the relative concentrations of Mo and Cr at point 3 were 2.1 and 18.0 mass%, respectively. The concentration of Ni at point 3 was 12.4 mass%. Therefore, the type 316L (SPS) prepared in this study was a typical type 316L stainless steel.

To determine the lattice structure of the Mo-rich phases, XRD analysis was conducted. Figure 3 shows the XRD patterns of the Mo powders, type 304L powders, and type 304L containing Mo-rich phases (SPS). For Mo powders, the main peak was detected at 40.587°, and three distinct peaks were observed at 58.646°, 73.742°, and 87.688°. The main peak and the other peaks were assigned to the (110), (200), (211), and (220) reflections of bcc-Mo. For the type 304L powders, the peaks appeared at 43.631°, 50.809°, and 74.730°. These peaks correspond to the (111), (200), and (220) reflections of the fcc structure. For type 304L containing Mo-rich phases (SPS), the peaks were observed at 43.631°, 44.577°, 50.768°, and 74.627°. These positions were almost the same as those observed for the type 304L powders. Even in the enlarged view of the XRD pattern shown in Fig. 3(d), there are no peaks corresponding to bcc-Mo. While it is possible that Mo-rich phases have an fcc structure, it is also possible that the amount of the bcc Mo-rich phases is below the detection limit.

Fig. 3

XRD patterns of (a) as-received Mo powder, (b) as-received type 304L powder, (c) type 304L containing Mo-rich phases (SPS), and (d) a magnified view of (c).

Based on the above results, for precision, type 304L containing Mo-rich phases (SPS) should be referred to as type 304L containing Mo- and Cr-rich phases (SPS). For simplicity, this sintered steel is referred to as type 304L containing Mo-rich phases (SPS).

3.2 Pitting corrosion resistance

To assess the pitting corrosion resistance, potentiodynamic polarization was performed. Figure 4 shows the anodic polarization curves of type 304L containing Mo-rich phases (SPS) in 0.1 M NaCl. The experiments were conducted three times to confirm reproducibility. In the first run, many current spikes were generated in the passive region, but no continuous increase in the current density was observed. In this case, the increase in the current density above 1.2 V was due to the oxygen evolution reaction, and no stable pitting was generated. In the second run, a large current increase was observed from 0.1 to 0.4 V. However, the current density suddenly decreased to the passive current density at ca. 0.4 V. The next large increase in the current density at ca. 0.7 V was due to stable pit initiation. The polarization behavior of the third run was almost the same as that of the second run. Based on this figure, the pitting potential of type 304L containing Mo-rich phases (SPS) was determined to be above 0.7 V.

Fig. 4

Anodic polarization curves of type 304L containing Mo-rich phases (SPS) in naturally aerated 0.1 M NaCl at pH 6.0 (298 K).

Figure 5 shows the polarization curves of type 316L (SPS) in 0.1 M NaCl. As a reference, the polarization curve of type 304L (SPS) is also included in the figure along with the potentiodynamic anodic polarization curves of the non-sintered steels (commercial type 304 and 316L sheets). Polarization measurements were conducted three times for type 316L (SPS). In all cases, the current density increased with electrode potential, and no passivation occurred. After polarization, pitting corrosion was observed, and the current increases were determined to be due to the initiation and growth of pitting. Similar polarization behavior was observed for type 304L (SPS). A comparison of these two sintered steels indicates that the presence of Mo in the solid solution did not lead to any changes in the current density. This is likely due to the existence of the voids since passive regions were obtained in the polarization curves in the non-sintered steels (commercial type 304 and 316L sheets), and the pitting potential increased due to Mo-alloying. It was concluded that the voids were the origin of the observed decrease in the pitting potentials, and that there was no or little beneficial effect of Mo-alloying on the pitting corrosion resistance of the sintered stainless steels. By contrast, as shown in Fig. 4, the passive region was clearly observed on type 304L containing Mo-rich phases (SPS). It should be noted that the pitting potential of this steel was higher than that of commercial type 316L sheet shown in Fig. 5. The pitting potential of type 304 and 316L sheets were ca. 0.5 V and ca. 0.6 V, respectively. By contrast, the pitting potential for type 304L containing Mo-rich phases (SPS) was determined to be above 0.7 V. It was found that the inhibition effect of Mo-rich phases on pitting corrosion was much higher than that of the Mo in the solid solution in the steel matrix. As mentioned above, also in the case of type 304L containing Mo-rich phases (SPS), the initiation sites of pitting were expected to be the voids. After pit initiation, it seems that the growth of pitting was effectively inhibited by the Mo-rich phases when the pits reached the Mo-rich phases. It is possible that the dissolved Mo-species from the Mo-rich phases prevent the pit growth. Furthermore, the dissolution rate of the Mo-rich phases is expected to be low and such a low rate give rise to the repassivation inside the pits. Further study is needed to determine the pitting corrosion inhibition mechanism of the Mo-rich phases where Cr is accumulated. Nevertheless, it can be concluded that the existence of Mo-rich phases in sintered stainless steels inhibits pitting growth.

Fig. 5

Anodic polarization curves of type 304L fabricated by SPS, type 316L fabricated by SPS, commercial type 304 sheet, and commercial type 316L sheet in naturally aerated 0.1 M NaCl at pH 6.0 (298 K).

4. Conclusions

  1. (1)    Pure Mo and type 304L powders were mixed for the formation of type 304L with 2.5 mass% Mo and subsequently sintered and heat-treated. It was confirmed that Mo- and Cr-enriched secondary phases were generated.
  2. (2)    In 0.1 M NaCl, the pitting potential of type 304L containing Mo-rich phases (SPS) was higher than that of commercial type 316L sheet.

REFERENCES
 
© 2020 The Japan Institute of Metals and Materials
feedback
Top