新地理
Online ISSN : 1884-7072
Print ISSN : 0559-8362
ISSN-L : 0559-8362
高等学校地理教員間にみられる指導と評価に関する認識及び実践状況の差異
問題解決能力の育成を中心に
ウェイ ヌ ヌ
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー

2001 年 49 巻 2 号 p. 1-17

詳細
抄録

The New Courses of Study prescribed in 1999 require teachers to develop students' competency in problem-solving, through the appropriate methods of teaching and evaluation. In developing students' problem-solving skills, what are favorable backgrounds of the teachers?
In order to investigate the upper secondary school Geography teachers' perception and practice of teaching and evaluation of problem-solving skills, the author and associate professor Hirakawa, Y. conducted a survey with a questionnaire in 2000, March.
This paper attempts to identify, on the basis of the analysis of the data of the survey, what kinds of backgrounds are more positive for teachers in students' problem-solving skills development. Data analysis was made in terms of teachers' backgrounds: (1) Alliance of academic society (member of the Association of Japanese Geographers/Japanese Association of Professional Geographers or not), (2) Faculty/course of undergraduate study (faculty/course pertaining to teacher education or not), (3) Major in graduation (majored in Geography or not), and (4) Highest level of educational attainment (graduate or postgraduate).
As a result, in general, differences among teachers in terms of their backgrounds are limited. As one channel of in-service teacher education, alliance of academic society is, however, found to be the most influential background with significant differences in 18 items out of 74. Teachers who belong to the academic societies have more positive concern towards teaching and evaluating problem-solving skills than teachers who do not. This can be interpreted that through the research activities of academic societies teachers develop problem-solving skills by themselves, and this may make them conscious and active in teaching and evaluating their students' problem-solving skills.
On the other hand, backgrounds pertaining to pre-service teacher education are less influential, especially regarding the type of faculty of undergraduate study. The result supports the principle of open system of pre-service teacher education.

著者関連情報
© 日本地理教育学会
次の記事
feedback
Top