シュンペーターにおける発展プロセスの不確定性 : 創造的破壊の時間と空間

抄録

This paper consideration to the indeterminate process of economic development of Schumpeter's [Business cycles]. [Business cycles] does not get enough estimation, still now because historical analysis. That has been recognized historical verification or analysis of institutional change. But in late years studies demonstration that one of Schumpeter's topic after 1912 year, application method of economic analysis to social areas (Andersen [2006]). Andersen said socio-cultural development recognized by extend Walrasian system to different areas of society as a whole. So, unsolved problem are (A) institutional change, (B) the interaction of innovations in various areas. And, Sionoya (1995) solved (A) by <economic sociology> from 「Capitalism, socialism and democracy(1942)」, and 「History of economic analysis (1954)」. But (B) still hasn't finished. By the way, Yagi (2008) assertion the indeterminateness in Schumpeter's economic sociology. [The development in each area occurs with the innovative activity of leading individuals that introduces an unpredictable novelty in the area concerned.] (p.54.) But there are two types of indefinite process in Schumpeter's theory. First: the innovation occurs in each area. Second: the interaction of those innovations. And 「The Theory of Economic Development」 published in 1912 discuss only first type's indeterminate. My assertion is that, Schumpeter considered 3 dimensional (including Time and Place) theory of Economic Development to solve second type's indeterminate in 1939. The main subject of this article is explain the matter from the historical analysis in [Business cycles], and solved (B). The 3rd chapter discuss indeterminate process of the socio-cultural development from 「Capitalism, socialism and democracy(1942)」, and 「History of economic analysis (1954)」 and explain the difference from "Lost" 7th chapter in 1912.