THE EFFECT OF PAST EXPERIENCE UPON THE BINOCULAR RIVALRY

KEN GORYO

doi:10.4992/psycholres1954.11.46

KEN GORYO

著者情報

ジャーナルフリー

1969 年 11 巻 2 号 p. 46-53

DOI https://doi.org/10.4992/psycholres1954.11.46

詳細

Published: 1969 Received: 1969/05/01 Available on J-STAGE: 2009/02/24 Accepted: - Advance online publication: - Revised: -
訂正情報
訂正日: 2009/02/24 訂正理由: - 訂正箇所: 論文抄録訂正内容: Wrong : This study examined the effect of the amount of past experience upon the binocular rivalry between one of portraits of male students (F-figure) and a geo-metrical figure (G-figure). Prior to the observation of binocular rivalry, F-figures were presented with different frequencies in the paradigm of paired-associate learning between F-figures and the family names randomly assigned to them. The results showed the tendency that the relative dominance of F-figure over the other in binocular rivalry systematically increases as the frequency of previous presentation (PF) of the F-figures increases.
Right : This study examined the effect of the amount of past experience upon the binocular rivalry between one of portraits of male students (F-figure) and a geometrical figure (G-figure). Prior to the observation of binocular rivalry, F-figures were presented with different frequencies in the paradigm of pairedassociate learning between F-figures and the family names randomly assigned to them. The results showed the tendency that the relative dominance of F-figure over the other in binocular rivalry systematically increases as the frequency of previous presentation (PF) of the F-figures increases.

訂正日: 2009/02/24 訂正理由: - 訂正箇所: 所属機関情報訂正内容: 訂正前 :
1) Department of Psychology, Chiba University

訂正後 :
1) Department of Psycholopy, Chiba University

訂正日: 2009/02/24 訂正理由: - 訂正箇所: 引用文献情報訂正内容: Wrong : ALEXANDER, H. W. 1946 A general test for trend. Psychol. Bull., 43, 533-557.
BAGBY, J. W. 1957 A cross-cultural study of perceptual dominance in binocular rivalry., J. abnorrn. soc. Psychol., 54, 331-334.
BOTHA, E. 1963 Past experience and figure-ground perception. Percept. mot. Skills, 16, 283-288.
CARLSON, V. R. 1953 Satiation in a reversible perspective figure. J. exp. Psychol., 45, 442-448.
DAVIS, J. M. 1959 Personality, perceptual de-fence, and stereoscopic perception. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 58, 398-402.
ENGEL, E. 1956 The role of content in binocular resolution. Amer. J. Psychol., 69, 87-91.
HASTORF, A. H., & MYRO, G. 1959 The effect of meaning on binocular rivalry. Amer. J. Psychol., 72, 393-400.
HOCHBERG, J. E. 1950 Figure-ground reversal as a function of visual satiation. J. exp. Psychol., 40, 683-686.
KAKIZAKI, S. 1950a The effects of preceding conditions upon binocular rivalry. (I) Jap. J. Psychol., 20, 24-32 (In Japanese with English summary).
KAKIZAKI, S. 1950b The effects of preceding conditions upon binocular rivalry. (II) Jap. J. Psychol., 20, 11-17 (In Japanese with English summary).
NINOMIYA, H. 1958 The effect of past experienceupon the figure-ground reversal. Jap. J. Psychol., 28, 391-395 (In Japanese).
OYAMA, T. 1952 Figural after effects and reversible figures. In M. Sagara (Ed.), China Sensei Kanreki Kinen Ronbunshu, 47-55 (In Japanese).
OYAMA, T. 1960 Figure-ground dominance as a function of sector angle, brightness, hue and orientation. J. exp. Psychol., 60, 299-305.
PETTIGREW, T. F., ALLPORT, G. W., & BARNETT, E. C. 1958 Binocular resolution and perception of race in South Africa. Brit. J. Psychol., 49, 265-278.
ROCK, I., & KREMEN, I. 1957 A re-examination of Robin's figural after-effect. J. exp. Psychol., 53, 23-30.
RUBIN, E. 1921 Visuell Wahrgenommene Figuren. Copenhagen: Gyldendalske.

Right : ALEXANDER, H. W. 1946 A general test for trend. Psychol. Bull., 43, 533-557.
BAGBY, J. W. 1957 A cross-cultural study of perceptual dominance in binocular rivalry. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 54, 331-334.
BOTHA, E. 1963 Past experience and figureground perception. Percept. mot. Skills, 16, 283-288.
CARLSON, V. R. 1953 Satiation in a reversible perspective figure. J. exp. Psychol., 45, 442-448.
DAVts, J. M. 1959 Personality, perceptual defence, and stereoscopic perception. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 58, 398-402.
ENGEL, E. 1956 The role of content in binocular resolution. Amer. J. Psychol., 69, 87-91.
HASTORF, A. H., & MYRO, C. 1959 The effect of meaning on binocular rivalry. Amer. J. Psychol., 72, 393-400.
HOCHBERG, J. E. 1950 Figure-ground reversal as a function of visual satiation. J. exp. Psychol., 40, 683-686.
KAKIZAKI, S. 1950a The effects of preceding conditions upon binocular rivalry.(I) Jap. J. Psychol., 20, 24-32 (In Japanese with English summary).
KAKIZAKI, S. 195013 The effects of preceding conditions upon binocular rivalry.(II) Jap. J. Psychol., 20, 11-17 (In Japanese with English summary).
NINOMIYA, H. 1958 The effect of past experience upon the figure-ground reversal. Jap. J. Psychol., 28, 391-395 (In Japanese).
OYAMA, T. 1952 Figural after effects and reversible figures. In M. Sagara (Ed.), Chiwa Sensei Kanreki Kinen Ronbunshu, 47-55 (In Japanese).
OYAMA, T. 1960 Figure-ground dominance as a function of sector angle, brightness, hue and orientation. J. exp. Psychol., 60, 299-305.
PETTIGREW, T. F., ALLPORT, G. W., & BARNETT, E. C. 1958 Binocular resolution and perception of race in South Africa. Brit. J. Psychol., 49, 265-278.
ROCK, I., & KREMEN, I. 1957 A reexamination of Rubin's figural after-effect. J. exp. Psychol., 53, 23-30.
RUBIN, E. 1921 Visuell Wahrgenommene Figuren. Copenhagen: Gyldendalske.

訂正日: 2009/02/24 訂正理由: - 訂正箇所: PDFファイル訂正内容: -

訂正日: 2009/02/24 訂正理由: - 訂正箇所: 引用文献情報訂正内容: Wrong : ALEXANDER, H. W. 1946 A general test for trend. Psychol. Bull., 43, 533-557.
BAGBY, J. W. 1957 A cross-cultural study of perceptual dominance in binocular rivalry. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 54, 331-334.
BOTHA, E. 1963 Past experience and figureground perception. Percept. mot. Skills, 16, 283-288.
CARLSON, V. R. 1953 Satiation in a reversible perspective figure. J. exp. Psychol., 45, 442-448.
DAVts, J. M. 1959 Personality, perceptual defence, and stereoscopic perception. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 58, 398-402.
ENGEL, E. 1956 The role of content in binocular resolution. Amer. J. Psychol., 69, 87-91.
HASTORF, A. H., & MYRO, C. 1959 The effect of meaning on binocular rivalry. Amer. J. Psychol., 72, 393-400.
HOCHBERG, J. E. 1950 Figure-ground reversal as a function of visual satiation. J. exp. Psychol., 40, 683-686.
KAKIZAKI, S. 1950a The effects of preceding conditions upon binocular rivalry.(I) Jap. J. Psychol., 20, 24-32 (In Japanese with English summary).
KAKIZAKI, S. 195013 The effects of preceding conditions upon binocular rivalry.(II) Jap. J. Psychol., 20, 11-17 (In Japanese with English summary).
NINOMIYA, H. 1958 The effect of past experience upon the figure-ground reversal. Jap. J. Psychol., 28, 391-395 (In Japanese).
OYAMA, T. 1952 Figural after effects and reversible figures. In M. Sagara (Ed.), Chiwa Sensei Kanreki Kinen Ronbunshu, 47-55 (In Japanese).
OYAMA, T. 1960 Figure-ground dominance as a function of sector angle, brightness, hue and orientation. J. exp. Psychol., 60, 299-305.
PETTIGREW, T. F., ALLPORT, G. W., & BARNETT, E. C. 1958 Binocular resolution and perception of race in South Africa. Brit. J. Psychol., 49, 265-278.
ROCK, I., & KREMEN, I. 1957 A reexamination of Rubin's figural after-effect. J. exp. Psychol., 53, 23-30.
RUBIN, E. 1921 Visuell Wahrgenommene Figuren. Copenhagen: Gyldendalske.

Right : ALEXANDER, H. W. 1946 A general test for trend. Psychol. Bull., 43, 533-557.
BAGBY, J. W. 1957 A cross-cultural study of perceptual dominance in binocular rivalry. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 54, 331-334.
BOTHA, E. 1963 Past experience and figureground perception. Percept. mot. Skills, 16, 283-288.
CARLSON, V. R. 1953 Satiation in a reversible perspective figure. J. exp. Psychol., 45, 442-448.
DAVIS, J. M. 1959 Personality, perceptual defence, and stereoscopic perception. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 58, 398-402.
ENGEL, E. 1956 The role of content in binocular resolution. Amer. J. Psychol., 69, 87-91.
HASTORF, A. H., & MYRO, G. 1959 The effect of meaning on binocular rivalry. Amer. J. Psychol., 72, 393-400.
HOCHBERG, J. E. 1950 Figure-ground reversal as a function of visual satiation. J. exp. Psychol., 40, 683-686.
KAKIZAKI, S. 1950a The effects of preceding conditions upon binocular rivalry.(I) Jap. J. Psychol., 20, 24-32 (In Japanese with English summary).
KAKIZAKI, S. 1950b The effects of preceding conditions upon binocular rivalry.(II) Jap. J. Psychol., 20, 11-17 (In Japanese with English summary).
NINOMIYA, H. 1958 The effect of past experience upon the figure-ground reversal. Jap. J. Psychol., 28, 391-395 (In Japanese).
OYAMA, T. 1952 Figural after effects and reversible figures. In M. Sagara (Ed.), Chiwa Sensei Kanreki Kinen Ronbunshu, 47-55 (In Japanese).
OYAMA, T. 1960 Figure-ground dominance as a function of sector angle, brightness, hue and orientation. J. exp. Psychol., 60, 299-305.
PETTIGREW, T. F., ALLPORT, G. W., & BARNETT, E. C. 1958 Binocular resolution and perception of race in South Africa. Brit. J. Psychol., 49, 265-278.
ROCK, I., & KREMEN, I. 1957 A re-examination of Rubin's figural after-effect. J. exp. Psychol., 53, 23-30.
RUBIN, E. 1921 Visuell Wahrgenommene Figuren. Copenhagen: Gyldendalske.

抄録

This study examined the effect of the amount of past experience upon the binocular rivalry between one of portraits of male students (F-figure) and a geometrical figure (G-figure). Prior to the observation of binocular rivalry, F-figures were presented with different frequencies in the paradigm of pairedassociate learning between F-figures and the family names randomly assigned to them. The results showed the tendency that the relative dominance of F-figure over the other in binocular rivalry systematically increases as the frequency of previous presentation (PF) of the F-figures increases.

責任著者(Corresponding author)

訂正情報

J-STAGEへの登録はこちら（無料）