Cross-over interaction and the set-size effect in information integration Are they mutually exclusive?

TOSHIO YAMAGISHI; CHARLES T. HILL

doi:10.4992/psycholres1954.28.129

情報統合におけるクロス・オーバー交互作用とセット・サイズ効果

これら二現象の相互背反性について

山岸俊男, CHARLES T. HILL

著者情報

ジャーナルフリー

1986 年 28 巻 3 号 p. 129-138

DOI https://doi.org/10.4992/psycholres1954.28.129

詳細

発行日: 1986/08/30 受付日: 1985/06/10 J-STAGE公開日: 2009/02/24 受理日: 1986/05/10 早期公開日: - 改訂日: -
訂正情報
訂正日: 2009/02/24 訂正理由: - 訂正箇所: 引用文献情報訂正内容: Wrong : Anderson, N. H. 1967 Averaging model analysis of set-size effect in impression formation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 158-165.
Anderson, N. H. 1968 Application of a linearserial model to a personality-impression task using serial presentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 354-362.
Anderson, N. H., & Butzin, C. A. 1974 Performance=motivation×ability: an integration theory analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 598-604.
Birnbaum, M. H. 1973 Morality judgment: test of an averaging model with differential weights. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 99, 395-399.
Birnbaum, M. H. 1974 The nonadditivity of personality impressions. Journal of Experimental Psychology (Monograph), 102, 543-561.
Birnbaum, M. H. 1976 Intuitive numerical prediction. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 417-429.
Hill, C. T., & Yamagishi, T. 1981 Further tests of the path analytic information integration model. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, California.
Kaplan, M. F. 1970 Forming impressions of personality: the effect of the initial impression. Psychonomic Science, 18, 255-256.
Kun, A., Parsons, J. E., & Ruble, D. N. 1974 Development of integration processes using ability and effort information to predict outcome. Developmental Psychology, 10, 721-732.
Oden, G. C., & Anderson, N. H. 1971 Differential weighting in integration theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 152-161.
Singh, R., Gupta, M., & Dalal, A. K. 1979 Cultural difference in attribution of performance: an integration-theorctical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1342-1351.
Sloan, L. R., & Ostrom, T. M. 1974 Amount of information and interpesonal judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 23-29.
Yamagishi, T., & Hill, C. T. 1981 Adding and averaging models revisited: a test of a path analytic integration model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 13-26.
Yamagishi, T., & Hill, C. T. 1983 Initial impression versus missing information as explanation of the set-size effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 942-951.

Right : Anderson, N. H. 1967 Averaging model analysis of set-size effect in impression formation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 158-165.
Anderson, N. H. 1968 Application of a linearserial model to a personality-impression task using serial presentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 354-362.
Anderson, N. H., & Butzin, C. A. 1974 Performance=motivation × ability: an integration theory analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 598-604.
Birnbaum, M. H. 1973 Morality judgment: test of an averaging model with differential weights. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 99, 395-399.
Birnbaum, M. H. 1974 The nonadditivity of personality impressions. Journal of Experimental Psychology (Monograph), 102, 543-561.
Birnbaum, M. H. 1976 Intuitive numerical prediction. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 417-429.
Hill, C. T., & Yamagishi, T. 1981 Further tests of the path analytic information integration model. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, California.
Kaplan, M. F. 1970 Forming impressions of personality: the effect of the initial impression. Psychonomic Science, 18, 255-256.
Kun, A., Parsons, J. E., & Ruble, D. N. 1974 Development of integration processes using ability and effort information to predict outcome. Developmental Psychology, 10, 721-732.
Oden, G. C., & Anderson, N. H. 1971 Differential weighting in integration theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 152-161.
Singh, R., Gupta, M., & Halal, A. K. 1979 Cultural difference in attribution of performance: an integration-theoretical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1342-1351.
Sloan, L. R., & Ostrom, T. M. 1974 Amount of information and interpersonal judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 23-29.
Yamagishi, T., & C. T. 1981 Adding and averaging models revisited: a test of a path analytic integration model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 13-26.
Yamagishi, T., & Hill, C. T. 1983 Initial impression versus missing information as explanation of the set-size effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 942-951.

訂正日: 2009/02/24 訂正理由: - 訂正箇所: PDFファイル訂正内容: -

訂正日: 2009/02/24 訂正理由: - 訂正箇所: 引用文献情報訂正内容: Wrong : Anderson, N. H. 1967 Averaging model analysis of set-size effect in impression formation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 158-165.
Anderson, N. H. 1968 Application of a linearserial model to a personality-impression task using serial presentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 354-362.
Anderson, N. H., & Butzin, C. A. 1974 Performance=motivation × ability: an integration theory analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 598-604.
Birnbaum, M. H. 1973 Morality judgment: test of an averaging model with differential weights. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 99, 395-399.
Birnbaum, M. H. 1974 The nonadditivity of personality impressions. Journal of Experimental Psychology (Monograph), 102, 543-561.
Birnbaum, M. H. 1976 Intuitive numerical prediction. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 417-429.
Hill, C. T., & Yamagishi, T. 1981 Further tests of the path analytic information integration model. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, California.
Kaplan, M. F. 1970 Forming impressions of personality: the effect of the initial impression. Psychonomic Science, 18, 255-256.
Kun, A., Parsons, J. E., & Ruble, D. N. 1974 Development of integration processes using ability and effort information to predict outcome. Developmental Psychology, 10, 721-732.
Oden, G. C., & Anderson, N. H. 1971 Differential weighting in integration theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 152-161.
Singh, R., Gupta, M., & Halal, A. K. 1979 Cultural difference in attribution of performance: an integration-theoretical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1342-1351.
Sloan, L. R., & Ostrom, T. M. 1974 Amount of information and interpersonal judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 23-29.
Yamagishi, T., & C. T. 1981 Adding and averaging models revisited: a test of a path analytic integration model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 13-26.
Yamagishi, T., & Hill, C. T. 1983 Initial impression versus missing information as explanation of the set-size effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 942-951.

Right : Anderson, N. H. 1967 Averaging model analysis of set-size effect in impression formation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 158-165.
Anderson, N. H. 1968 Application of a linearserial model to a personality-impression task using serial presentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 354-362.
Anderson, N. H., & Butzin, C. A. 1974 Performance=motivation × ability: an integration theory analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 598-604.
Birnbaum, M. H. 1973 Morality judgment: test of an averaging model with differential weights. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 99, 395-399.
Birnbaum, M. H. 1974 The nonadditivity of personality impressions. Journal of Experimental Psychology (Monograph), 102, 543-561.
Birnbaum, M. H. 1976 Intuitive numerical prediction. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 417-429.
Hill, C. T., & Yamagishi, T. 1981 Further tests of the path analytic information integration model. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, California.
Kaplan, M. F. 1970 Forming impressions of personality: the effect of the initial impression. Psychonomic Science, 18, 255-256.
Kun, A., Parsons, J. E., & Ruble, D. N. 1974 Development of integration processes using ability and effort information to predict outcome. Developmental Psychology, 10, 721-732.
Oden, G. C., & Anderson, N. H. 1971 Differential weighting in integration theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 152-161.
Singh, R., Gupta, M., & Dalal, A. K. 1979 Cultural difference in attribution of performance: an integration-theoretical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1342-1351.
Sloan, L. R., & Ostrom, T. M. 1974 Amount of information and interpersonal judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 23-29.
Yamagishi, T., & Hill, C. T. 1981 Adding and averaging models revisited: a test of a path analytic integration model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 13-26.
Yamagishi, T., & Hill, C. T. 1983 Initial impression versus missing information as explanation of the set-size effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 942-951.

抄録

The path-analytic averaging (PAA) model of information integration predicts that the two most important findings in the information integration literature, cross-over interaction and the set-size effect, are mutually exclusive. Previous tests of the PAA model have examined cross-over interaction and the set-size effect separately; the present experiment tested both simultaneously, by asking 40 undergraduates to rate the desirability of candidates for secretarial positions based on one or two items of information. Findings supported the exclusivity prediction in experimental conditions in which no fan spread of the two-item slopes occurred. When fan spread was elicited, however, exclusivity was not so clearly supported.

責任著者(Corresponding author)

訂正情報

J-STAGEへの登録はこちら（無料）