STUDIES ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTELLIGENCE STRUCTURE AND PERSONALITY TRAITS AN ANALYSIS OF WISC DISCREPANCY

FUJIRO SHINAGAWA

doi:10.4992/psycholres1954.5.55

STUDIES ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTELLIGENCE STRUCTURE AND PERSONALITY TRAITS

AN ANALYSIS OF WISC DISCREPANCY

FUJIRO SHINAGAWA

著者情報

ジャーナルフリー

1963 年 5 巻 2 号 p. 55-62

DOI https://doi.org/10.4992/psycholres1954.5.55

詳細

Published: 1963 Received: 1963/03/20 Available on J-STAGE: 2009/02/24 Accepted: - Advance online publication: - Revised: -
訂正情報
訂正日: 2009/02/24 訂正理由: - 訂正箇所: 論文受付日訂正内容: 訂正前 : 19630520
訂正後 : 19630320

訂正日: 2009/02/24 訂正理由: - 訂正箇所: 論文抄録訂正内容: Wrong : Discrepancy between Verbal IQ and Performance IQ has been regarded as a symptom of abnormality in personality.
The present writer tried to analyze WISC discrepancy with an assumption that it may have something to do with personality traits, not only of abnormal but also of normal children.
Thirteen groups of subjects with special personality traits pattern who were resorted to our psycho-educational clinic and who were tested at various schools were compared with unselected group (N=603).
While unselected group shows no dominance either in Verbal or in Per-formance, thirteen groups show different types of discrepancy distribution.
From the fact that different pattern of personality traits shows peculiar type of discrepancy, we can conclude intelligence structure has relationship with per-sonality traits.
Right : Discrepancy between Verbal IQ and Performance IQ has been regarded as a symptom of abnormality in personality.
The present writer tried to analyze WISC discrepancy with an assumption that it may have something to do with personality traits, not only of abnormal but also of normal children.
Thirteen groups of subjects with special personality traits pattern who were resorted to our psycho-educational clinic and who were tested at various schools were compared with unselected group (N=603).
While unselected group shows no dominance either in Verbal or in Performance, thirteen groups show different types of discrepancy distribution.
From the fact that different pattern of personality traits shows peculiar type of discrepancy, we can conclude intelligence structure has relationship with personality traits.

訂正日: 2009/02/24 訂正理由: - 訂正箇所: 引用文献情報訂正内容: Wrong : ALTUS, G. T. Relationship between verbal and non-verbal parts of the CTMM and WISC. J. Consul. Psychol., 1955, 19, 2, 143-144.
BARRAT, E. S., & Baumgarten, D. L. The relationship of the WISC and Stanford-Binet to school achievement. J. Consul. Psychol., 1951, 15, 3, 236-238.
COHEN, B. D., & COLLIER, M. J. A note on the WISC and other tests of children six to eight. J. Consul. Psychol., 1952, 16, 226-227.
FRANDSEN, A. N., & HIGGINSON J. B. The Stan-ford-Binet and the WISC. J. Consul. Psychol., 1951, 15, 3, 236-238.
HARLOW, J. E., PRICE, A. C., TATHAM, L. J., & DAVIDSON, J. F. Preliminary study of com-parison between WISC and form L of revised S-B scale at three age levels. J. Clin. Psychol., 1957, 13, 1, 72-73.
HOLLAND, G. A. A comparison of the WISC and Stanford-Binet IQ's of normal children. J. Consul. Psychol., 1953, 17, 2, 147-152.
KODAMA, H., & SHINAGAWA, F. WISC Japanese edition. 1953, Tokyo: Nihon-Bunka-Kagaku-sha.
KRUGMAN, J. I., JUSTMAN, J., WRIGHTSTONE, J. W., & KRUGMAN, M. Pupil functioning on the Stanford-Binet and WISC. J. Consul. Psychol., 1951, 15, 6, 475-483.
MUSSEN, P., DEAN, S., & ROSENBERG, M. Some further evidence on the validity of WISC. J. Consul. Psychol., 1952, 16, 5, 410-411.
PASTOVIC, J. J., GUTHRIE, G. M. Some evidence on the validity of WISC. J. Consul. Psychol., 1951, 15, 5, 385-386.
SEASHORE, H. G. Differences between verbal and performance IQs on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. J. Consul. Psychol., 1951, 15, 1, 62-67.
TRIGGS, F. O., & CARTEE, J. K. Pre-school pupil performance of the Stanford-Binet and the WISC. J. Clin. Psychol., 1953, 9, 1, 27-29.
WECHSLER D. The measurement of adult intelligence, 1939. Baltimore: The Williams, & Wilkins Co.
WECHSLER, D. Wechsler intelligence scale for chidren, children, 1949, New York: The Psychological Corporation, A. P. A.
WEIDER, A., NOLLER, P. A., & SCHRAMM, T. A. WISC and received Stanford-Binet. J. Consul. Psychol., 1951, 15, 330-333.

Right : ALTUS, G. T. Relationship between verbal and non-verbal parts of the CTMM and WISC. J. Consul. Psychol., 1955, 19, 2, 143-144.
BARRAT, E. S., & Baumgarten, D. L. The relationship of the WISC and Stanford-Binet to school achievement. J. Consul. Psychol., 1951, 15, 3, 236-238.
COHEN, B. D., & COLLIER, M. J. A note on the WISC and other tests of children six to eight. J. Consul. Psychol., 1952, 16, 226-227.
FRANDSEN, A. N., & HIGGINSON J. B. The Stanford-Binet and the WISC. J. Consul. Psychol., 1951, 15, 3, 236-238.
HARLOW, J. E., PRICE, A. C., TATHAM, L. J., & DAVIDSON, J. F. Preliminary study of comparison between WISC and form L of revised S-B scale at three age levels. J. Clin. Psychol., 1957, 13, 1, 72-73.
HOLLAND, G. A. A comparison of the WISC and Stanford-Binet IQ's of normal children. J. Consul. Psychol., 1953, 17, 2, 147-152.
KODAMA, H., & SHINAGAWA, F. WISC Japanese edition. 1953, Tokyo: Nihon-Bunka-Kagakusha.
KRUGMAN, J. I., JUSTMAN, J., WRIGHTSTONE, J. W., & KRUGMAN, M. Pupil functioning on the Stanford-Binet and WISC. J. Consul. Psychol., 1951, 15, 6, 475-483.
MUSSEN, P., DEAN, S., & ROSENBERG, M. Some further evidence on the validity of WISC. J. Consul. Psychol., 1952, 16, 5, 410-411.
PASTOVIC, J. J., GUTHRIE, G. M. Some evidence on the validity of WISC. J. Consul. Psychol., 1951, 15, 5, 385-386.
SEASHORE, H. G. Differences between verbal and performance IQs on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. J. Consul. Psychol., 1951, 15, 1, 62-67.
TRIGGS, F. O., & CARTEE, J. K. Pre-school pupil performance of the Stanford-Binet and the WISC. J. Clin. Psychol., 1953, 9, 1, 27-29.
WECHSLER D. The measurement of adult intelligence, 1939. Baltimore: The Williams, & Wilkins Co.
WECHSLER, D. Wechsler intelligence scale for chidren, children, 1949, New York: The Psychological Corporation, A. P. A.
WEIDER, A., NOLLER, P. A., & SCHRAMM, T. A. WISC and received Stanford-Binet. J. Consul. Psychol., 1951, 15, 330-333.

訂正日: 2009/02/24 訂正理由: - 訂正箇所: PDFファイル訂正内容: -

訂正日: 2009/02/24 訂正理由: - 訂正箇所: 論文タイトル訂正内容: Wrong : STUDIES ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTELLIGENCE STRUCTURE AND PERSONALITY TRAITS: AN ANALYSIS OF WISC DISCREPANCY
Right : STUDIES ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTELLIGENCE STRUCTURE AND PERSONALITY TRAITS

訂正日: 2009/02/24 訂正理由: - 訂正箇所: 論文サブタイトル訂正内容: Right : AN ANALYSIS OF WISC DISCREPANCY

抄録

Discrepancy between Verbal IQ and Performance IQ has been regarded as a symptom of abnormality in personality.
The present writer tried to analyze WISC discrepancy with an assumption that it may have something to do with personality traits, not only of abnormal but also of normal children.
Thirteen groups of subjects with special personality traits pattern who were resorted to our psycho-educational clinic and who were tested at various schools were compared with unselected group (N=603).
While unselected group shows no dominance either in Verbal or in Performance, thirteen groups show different types of discrepancy distribution.
From the fact that different pattern of personality traits shows peculiar type of discrepancy, we can conclude intelligence structure has relationship with personality traits.

責任著者(Corresponding author)

訂正情報

J-STAGEへの登録はこちら（無料）