Abstract
This essay is to interpret and to add some comments for the Legal Case of Repeal Request (Judgment of the Supreme Court on Oct. 09. 2007). On this case, Plaintiff, the students over 20years old, who go disabled persons, insisted that the National Pension Law was illegal and claimed that Disability Pension Incompetent Ruling for them should be repealed. First, the HIROSHIMA District Court judged the National Pension law was unconstitutional legislation and accepted a part of asserting plaintiffs' rights to receive state compensation (on Mar. 3rd. 2005). Later, the HIROSHIMA High Court rejected the former judgment and give decision that the National Pension Law was not necessarily unconstitutional legislation and state compensation does not needed (on Feb. 22. 2006). Finally the Supreme Court upheld the High Court judgment (on Oct. 09. 2007). I compared this Repeal Request judgment to other judgments and stated that the judge should be accepted a part of plaintiffs' claim because of the National Pension Law's unconstitutional.
