書学書道史研究
Online ISSN : 1884-2550
Print ISSN : 1883-2784
ISSN-L : 1883-2784
論文
近衛本『和漢朗詠集』の性格
粘葉本系統との関係を中心に
山本 まり子
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー

2014 年 2014 巻 24 号 p. 29-41,118

詳細
抄録

Previous studies on the text of the Konoe 近衛 manuscript of the Wakan rōeishū 和漢朗詠集 have been published by Horibe Shōji 堀部正二 and Katagiri Yōichi 片桐洋一. Horibe argued that the Konoe manuscript and the Detchōbon 粘葉本, Iyo-gire 伊予切, and Hōrinji-gire 法輪寺切 manuscripts belong to "completely the same line" of manuscripts, while Katagiri too wrote that "the texts of the Detchōbon manuscript and Konoe manuscript coincide even in minor points" and are "completely similar."
  In this article, having been able to examine some materials not consulted by Horibe and Katagiri, I reexamine with respect to both format and text the position of the Konoe manuscript among manuscripts considered to have been copied during the Heian period, with a focus on its relationship with the Detchōbon, Iyo-gire, and Hōrinji-gire manuscripts. My findings can be summarized under the following three points.
  (1) Regarding the presence or absence of particular lines of verse, if one excludes special cases, the Konoe manuscript coincides with the Detchōbon, Iyo-gire, and Hōrinji-gire manuscripts. However, some minor differences were found between the Konoe manuscript and the Detchōbon and Iyo-gire manuscripts.
  (2) As for the arrangement of the poems, the Konoe manuscript coincides completely with the Detchōbon, Iyo-gire, and Hōrinji-gire manuscripts.
  (3) As regards individual textual differences, the Konoe manuscript and the Det-chōbon, Iyo-gire, and Hōrinji-gire manuscripts share many identical passages, but some differences were also found, and in content too it would seem that the Konoe manuscript is different in character from the other manuscripts.
  It has thus become clear that while the Konoe manuscript belongs to the same line of manuscripts as the Detchōbon, Iyo-gire, and Hōrinji-gire manuscripts, it differs somewhat in character from these three manuscripts.

著者関連情報
© 2014 書学書道史学会
前の記事 次の記事
feedback
Top