Journal of Research in Science Education
Online ISSN : 2187-509X
Print ISSN : 1345-2614
ISSN-L : 1345-2614
Original Papers
Classification and Exploratory Characteristics of “Questions” in Elementary School Science Textbooks in Japan: Through Comparison of Y Company’s 2010 and 2019 Textbooks Certified by the Ministry of Education
Yuuki HONDAKento YAMADAJun-ichi KURIHARATakayuki YAMADA
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2022 Volume 63 Issue 2 Pages 381-398

Details
Abstract

The first purpose of this study was to attempt a classification based on Yoshida (2012) of the “questions” of observations and experiments in the 2019 approved elementary science textbooks by Company Y, and to clarify the characteristics of the “questions” by comparing them with the 2010 approved elementary science textbooks that Yoshida (2012) analyzed, as well as the 2020 approved lower secondary school science textbooks that Yamada et al. (2022) analyzed. The second purpose was to clarify the exploratory characteristics of the “questions” by classifying them based on the three perspectives of Yamada et al. (2021), namely “qualitative/quantitative,” “hypothesis setting” and “variable control.” The results of our findings yielded, the following three points:

(1) The total number of “yes/no”, “how+verb,” and “how/what+noun” questions in the 2019 approved elementary science textbooks by Company Y accounted for approximately 72% of the total

(2) Verifiable “questions” such as “how+verb” that ask about “change/state” and “means” had increased oxer the course of the decade, while “questions” that are difficult to verify such as “call” had decreased.

(3) Comparing the 2019 approved elementary school science textbooks with the 2020 approved lower secondary school science textbooks, the former has significantly more “yes/no” than the latter, and significantly less “how/what+noun” and “call.”

Furthermore, as a result of examining the relationship between the characteristic skills organized from the three perspectives of Yamada et al. (2021b) and “questions,” which was the second purpose of the study, the following three points were suggested.

(4) In the “qualitative/quantitative” perspective, there were significantly more qualitative “questions” in the “nature” of “how/what+noun”.

(5) In the “presence/absence of hypothesis setting,” significantly more “questions” that included hypothesis setting were found in “yes/no,” “how+verb,” and “what” formats.

(6) In the “with/without variable control” category, there were significantly more “questions” that did not include variable control in the “how/what+noun” and “how much” categories.

The applicability of the findings of this study to elementary school science textbooks from publishers other than Company Y, which were approved in 2019, remains to be examined in the future.

Content from these authors
© 2022 Society of Japan Science Teaching
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top