The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine
Online ISSN : 1349-3329
Print ISSN : 0040-8727
ISSN-L : 0040-8727
Regular Contributions
Benefits of Once-Daily Administration of Cyclosporine A for Children with Steroid-Dependent, Relapsing Nephrotic Syndrome
Koichi SuzukiEishin OkiKazushi TsurugaTomomi Aizawa-YashiroEtsuro ItoHiroshi Tanaka
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2010 Volume 220 Issue 3 Pages 183-186

Details
Abstract
Cyclosporine A (CsA) is an effective steroid-sparing agent for patients with steroid-dependent, relapsing nephrotic syndrome (SDRNS). The efficacy and safety of single-daily dose administration (SDD protocol) of CsA in selected patients with SDRNS has been reported. However, the efficacy of initial CsA treatment for children with SDRNS using the SDD protocol remains to be elucidated. The SDD protocol might be associated with lower clinical toxicity, compared to the conventional twice-daily dose administration (TDD protocol). Here we evaluated the efficacy and safety of the SDD protocol versus the TDD protocol in patients with SDRNS. The data from 19 patients (9.9 ± 4.2 years old) were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Ten patients treated according to the SDD protocol for a mean of 27 months (SDD group), while 9 patients treated with the TDD protocol for a mean of 35 months (TDD group) as an initial CsA treatment. Although the mean daily CsA dose was significantly lower in the SDD group (1.5 ± 0.4 mg/kg/day vs. 3.7 ± 0.7 mg/kg/day, P < 0.01), there were no differences between the two groups in the mean minimum dose of prednisolone required for maintenance of clinical remission nor in the calculated relapse rate. One patient in the TDD group developed biopsy-proven mild CsA nephrotoxicity, whereas no patient in the SDD group showed nephrotoxicity. Despite a small number of patients, this study may support that the SDD protocol is at least as effective as the conventional TDD protocol, and is more cost-effective for selected children with SDRNS.
Content from these authors
© 2010 Tohoku University Medical Press
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top