The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine
Online ISSN : 1349-3329
Print ISSN : 0040-8727
ISSN-L : 0040-8727
Regular Contribution
Integrated Bioinformatics Analysis Predicts the Key Genes Involved in Aortic Valve Calcification: From Hemodynamic Changes to Extracellular Remodeling
Mu LiuMing LuoHaoliang SunBuqing NiYongfeng Shao
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー HTML

2017 年 243 巻 4 号 p. 263-273

詳細
Abstract

In our aging world, increasing numbers of people are suffering from calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD). In this study, we used integrated bioinformatics analysis to predict several key genes that are involved in the initiation and progression of CAVD. Expression profiles of 15 calcific and 14 normal human aortic valve samples were generated from two gene expression datasets (GSE12644 and GSE51472). Dataset GSE26953 from the human aortic valve fibrosa-derived endothelial cells cultured under laminar or oscillatory shear stress was also evaluated. Related R packages were used to process the data. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses were performed for functional annotation. Hub genes were identified based on the protein-protein interaction network. CAVD-related gene modules were identified by Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA). The predicted key genes were manually reviewed. In our present work, complex connections among mechano-response, oxidative stress, inflammation and extracellular remodeling pathways in the etiology of CAVD were revealed. The key genes, thus identified, encode a transcription factor KLF2 and phospholipid phosphatase 3 (PLPP3) that are involved in mechano-responses; eNOS involved in oxidative stress; IL-8 involved in inflammation; and collagen triple helix repeat containing 1 (CTHRC1) and secretogranin II (SCG2) involved in extracellular remodeling. These gene products are predicted to play critical roles in CAVD development and progression. The present study provides valuable information for future research and drug development.

Introduction

Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) is the most common type of valvular disease in the modern world, causing great morbidity and mortality. CAVD affects approximately 3% of the population aged 75 years or older (Thaden et al. 2014), making it an enormous threat to public health in the aging world (d’Arcy et al. 2011). CAVD is a progressive disease (Freeman and Otto 2005). In its later stage, the fibrotic, thickened and calcific aortic valves could increase the obstruction of blood outflow, causing aortic valve stenosis (AS), which leads to significant hemodynamic deterioration. Without proper intervention, AS could cause left ventricular hypertrophy, angina pectoris, heart failure, or even death.

CAVD is a complex disease involving various mechanisms and factors, such as lipid deposition, oxidation, inflammation, and mineralization (Lindman et al. 2016). In addition, mechanical issues, such as those in the local hemodynamic environment, are thought to be a causative factor of CAVD (Gould et al. 2013). Two examples demonstrate this viewpoint. One is the susceptibility of the bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) to valve calcification (Michelena et al. 2014); BAV is a congenital valve defect in which the patient has only two aortic valves, while a normal person has three. BAVs experience more hemodynamic stress, which can increase the risk of developing CAVD (Szeto et al. 2013). The other example is the side-dependent pathological characteristics of CAVD. The fibrosa of the aortic valve, which directly faces the aorta, is the most common location for calcification, whereas the other layers of the aortic valve are relatively unaffected (Stewart et al. 1997). This difference may be attributed to the different hemodynamic conditions (Weinberg et al. 2010). Due to its anatomic structure, the fibrosa experiences more oscillatory shear stress, pressure and stretch (Balachandran et al. 2011). Altogether, biomechanical factors are acknowledged as an initiative factor in the development of CAVD (Back et al. 2013).

Currently, no drug can prevent or halt the progression of CAVD. Aortic valve replacement (AVR) via surgical means remains the mainstream strategy (Nishimura et al. 2017). However, in addition to the high cost of the AVR surgery (McCarthy et al. 2017), complications that accompany anti-coagulation therapy, reoperation due to the lifespan of the prosthetic valves, and the higher surgical risk for gerontic patients complicate the decision to undergo surgical intervention. Therefore, a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of CAVD and the discovery of additional key genes that may be potential therapeutic targets are required. High-throughput omics data obtained by microarray technology provide us with such an opportunity. In the past few years, several studies have reported on the gene expression profiles of human calcific aortic valves (Bosse et al. 2009; Ohukainen et al. 2015; Guauque-Olarte et al. 2016). However, due to the small sample size in these studies, repeatability and reliability are relatively poor, making it difficult to elucidate the underlying mechanisms. Several studies have performed in vitro evaluations of valve-derived cells that were cultured in different hemodynamic environments (Butcher et al. 2006; Holliday et al. 2011). However, the lack of cell types and poor biofidelity of the simulated ‘blood flow’ largely undermine the value of the data.

In the present work, we conducted an integrated bioinformatics analysis using publicly available gene expression datasets of calcific and normal human aortic valve tissues. In addition, we used a dataset containing expression profiles of in vitro human aortic valve endothelial cells from the fibrosa (fHAVECs) that were exposed to laminar or oscillatory shear stress for 24 hours. Batch effects were adjusted using the R package ComBat (Kupfer et al. 2012). To avoid shortcomings in traditional cut-off value-based enrichment analyses, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (Subramanian et al. 2005) was employed to perform Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis. Differentialy expressed genes (DEGs) were filtered out, protein-protein interaction networks were generated, and hub genes were predicted. Five common DEGs, including three DEGs exhibiting the same expression trends, appeared in both the in vitro study and the human valve study. To explore CAVD-related gene modules, Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) was performed. Genes in the CAVD-related modules were functionally annotated by GO. Publications related to the key genes revealed by the above analysis were manually reviewed and were discussed in the Discussion section.

Materials and Methods

Acquisition of microarray data

Three datasets investigating the expression profiles of calcific and normal aortic valves using microarray technology were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/), including datasets GSE12644 (Bosse et al. 2009), GSE51472 (Ohukainen et al. 2015) and GSE26953 (Holliday et al. 2011).

First, we analyzed the combined expression profiles from GSE12644 and GSE51472, which investigated 30 human aortic valve samples (15 calcific valves versus 15 normal valves). Additionally, to study CAVD from an in vitro aspect, we explored expression profiles from GSE26953, which included data on human aortic valve endothelial cells (from fibrosa) that were cultured for 24 hours in different hemodynamic environments.

Microarray data processing

For datasets GSE12644 and GSE51472, which were generated using the Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array, original data (.CEL files) were downloaded and preprocessed using the RMA algorithm. The systematic error introduced by the different time and location of the experiments is referred to as ‘batch effects’. Because three batches existed among these two datasets, the R language package ComBat (Kupfer et al. 2012) was used to adjust for batch effects (Chen et al. 2011). For dataset GSE26953, which was generated using the Illumina HumanHT-12 V3.0 expression beadchip, the online analysis tool GEO2R was employed. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were discovered by the limma package. An adjusted P value < 0.05 and |log2FC| > 1 were set as cut-off criteria. All codes were run under the R environment version 3.4.1.

Enrichment analysis using the Gene Set Enrichment Analysis method

GO enrichment analysis and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis were performed using the Gene Set Enrichment Analysis method (GSEA Version 3.0; Broad Institute, Cambridge, USA) (Subramanian et al. 2005) with MSigDB Version 6.0. Official protocols were utilized. Briefly, further P values were estimated by 1,000 permutations. Permutation type was set as ‘phenotype’ for human samples and ‘gene set’ for the in vitro experiments. Gene sets with an FDR < 25% and a nominal P value < 0.05 were considered to be significantly enriched pathways/terms.

Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network construction

We used the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING) (Szklarczyk et al. 2015) database (https://string-db.org) to generate a PPI network. The minimum required interaction score was 0.4 (medium confidence). Network data were loaded into Cytoscape software (version 3.5.1), and hub genes were calculated by applying Cytohubba (Chin et al. 2014) using the MCC algorithm.

Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA)

To explore genes and gene modules related to CAVD, WGCNA was performed on the expression profiles of human samples (Langfelder and Horvath 2008). Briefly, 3,000 genes with the highest variance among samples were selected. According to the network topology, the soft threshold power was set to 12 in order to create a nearly scale-free network. Gene co-expression adjacency matrices were calculated and transformed into the topological overlap matrix (TOM). The dynamic tree cut algorithm was applied to screen the modules, with the minimum module size being 30. GO enrichment analyses were used to functionally annotate the CAVD-related gene modules. Genes with the highest Gene Significance (GS) in modules with the highest and lowest correlation coefficients were regarded as significantly associated with CAVD, and related publications were manually reviewed.

Results

Processing the microarray data

To determine potential outliers, Pearson correlation coefficients between every two samples were calculated, and their distance matrix was visualized in the cluster dendrogram (Fig. 1A). Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed, and the plot is displayed in Fig. 1B. As revealed by these figures, samples were divided into two main categories, except GSM317342. Therefore, this sample was excluded in the following analysis. Box plots indicated that the preprocessing successfully normalized the expression profiles to a comparable level (Fig. 1C, D).

Fig. 1.

Detection of outliers and batch-effects adjustment.

GSM317342 was identified as an outlier sample according to (A) Cluster dendrogram of Pearson correlation coefficients and (B) Principal component analysis plot. As revealed by box plot (C), three batches exist among the original data and samples are not comparable. As revealed by box plot (D), preprocess and batch-effects adjustment successfully normalized the expression profiles to a comparable level.

Identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs)

Data from GSE12644 and GSE51472 on a total of 29 human aortic valve samples (15 calcific valves versus 14 normal valves) were preprocessed and compared, revealing 140 up-regulated and 68 down-regulated genes. MMP12 was the most up-regulated gene in calcific valves (fold change = 18.71), while ADIPOQ was the most down-regulated gene (fold change = 0.23).

By analyzing gene expression profiles of human aortic valve endothelial cells from the fibrosa (fHAVECs) that were exposed to laminar or oscillatory hemodynamic environments in GSE26953, we identified 150 DEGs (52 up-regulated and 98 down-regulated).

The Venn diagram (Fig. 2A) reveals that 5 genes (PLAU, PLPP3, ID1, KIT and HMOX1) were differently expressed in both the in vitro experiments and human samples. Their fold changes are shown in Fig. 2B. Publications related to these DEGs were manually reviewed and will be discussed in the Discussion section.

Fig. 2.

Identification of DEGs in both the in vitro study and human samples.

(A) Venn diagram revealed that 5 genes were differently expressed both in the in vitro study and human samples. (B) log2(fold change) of five DEGs appealed in both studies (PLAU, PLPP3, ID1, KIT, HMOX1). Positive value indicated up-regulation in calcific samples/oscillatory shear.

GO enrichment analysis

GO enrichment analysis was performed using the GSEA method. The top 10 enriched terms were determined. In human samples (Fig. 3A), GO terms related to the lymphocyte-mediated immune response were substantially up-regulated in calcific valves. In the in vitro experiments (Fig. 3B), GO terms related to skeletal muscle cell differentiation were significantly up-regulated in the fHAVECs exposed to an oscillatory hemodynamic environment, whereas GO terms related to the regulation of wound healing and regulation of IL-8 production were significantly down-regulated.

Fig. 3.

Top 10 enriched terms/pathways revealed by GO and KEGG analysis using GSEA.

Top 10 enriched terms/pathways revealed by (A) GO enrichment analysis in human calcific aortic valves. (B) GO enrichment analysis in the in vitro study. (C) KEGG enrichment analysis in human calcific aortic valves. (D) KEGG enrichment analysis in the in vitro study. The horizontal axis refer to the -log(P value) of each enriched term.

KEGG pathway enrichment analysis

KEGG analyses were performed using the GSEA method. The top 10 significantly enriched pathways were identified. The leukocyte transendothelial migration pathway was considerably enriched among human calcific valves (Fig. 3C). The DNA replication pathway was significantly up-regulated while the steroid biosynthesis pathway was significantly down-regulated among the fHAVECs exposed to an oscillatory hemodynamic environment (Fig. 3D).

Construction of the PPI network and identification of hub genes

PPI networks of DEGs were constructed using the STRING database. Using the Cytohubba application in the Cytoscape software, hub genes were determined and visualized (Fig. 4A, B). As revealed in these figures, CXCL8 (also known as IL-8) was identified as the hub gene of CAVD with the highest prediction score (Fig. 4A). Meanwhile, the gene NOS3 (commonly known as eNOS) was recognized as the hub gene with the highest prediction score among DEGs identified in the in vitro experiments (Fig. 4B).

Fig. 4.

Figures demonstrate 10 hub genes with the highest prediction scores.

Top 10 hub genes were predicted from (A) human calcific aortic valves and (B) the in vitro study of fHAVECs that were exposed to laminar or oscillatory shear stress for 24 hours. The vantical axis refer to the prediction scores.

WGCNA

Genes that interact tend to show similar expression patterns. Therefore, we constructed a co-expression network to screen gene modules with similar expression profiles. Six gene modules with similar expression patterns were identified by WGCNA. As summarized in Table 1, four of these modules had a P value < 0.05 and were functionally annotated by GO terms, with the lowest P values in three categories: Cellular Component (CC), Molecular Function (MF), and Biological Process (BP). Genes with the highest GS in modules with the highest and lowest correlation coefficients were as follows: CTHRC1 (from module ‘blue’, GS = 0.92, fold change = 3.71) and SCG2 (from module ‘turquoise’, GS = 0.93, fold change = 4.44). They were regarded as CAVD-related key genes, and related publications were manually reviewed and are discussed in the Discussion section.

Table 1.

CAVD-related gene modules identified by WGCNA.

BP, Biological Process; CC, Cellular Component; MF, Molecular Function.

Significant P values (P < 0.05) were marked in Bold text.

Discussion

As life expectancy increased and lifestyles shifted, CAVD has placed a heavy burden on the healthcare system and poses great challenges to public health, thus requiring more in-depth research. Currently, no medical therapies have been proven to be effective in preventing or halting the development of CAVD. This shows the importance of exploring the key genes in CAVD, which may be drug targets. CAVD involves complex biological processes (Lindman et al. 2016). Moreover, the microenvironment around the calcific lesions, including a series of bio-chemical and biomechanical factors as well as several pathways, also contributes to the initiation and progression of CAVD.

The overload of local hemodynamic stress has been regarded as a causative factor in the development and progression of CAVD (Balachandran et al. 2011; Back et al. 2013; Gould et al. 2013; Wang et al. 2014). GSE26953 datasets containing expression profiles of fHAVECs exposed to laminar/oscillatory shear stress were combined with the integrated expression profiles of human samples. By comparing DEGs in both the in vivo and in vitro gene expression profiles, we discovered 5 common DEGs and explored the influence of local hemodynamic changes on valve calcification.

PLPP3, also known as PPAP2B, encodes phospholipid phosphatase 3, which catalyzes the dephosphorylation of lipid substrates, and was identified as a down-regulated gene in both human calcific aortic valve samples (fold change = 0.45) and in vitro samples (fold change = 0.21). The PLPP3 gene has been shown by genome wide association studies (GWAS) to harbor risk loci for coronary artery disease (Mehta 2011). Risk alleles were further shown to be associated with lower endothelial PLPP3 expression (Erbilgin et al. 2013). Recently, Busnelli et al. (2017) revealed that deletion of hepatic PLPP3 altered plasma lipid composition and worsened atherosclerosis in apoE−/− mice. In the present work, we predicted that PLPP3 might participate in the development of CAVD in a mechano-sensitive manner. Interestingly, Wu et al. (2015) found that PLPP3 was a key gene in atherosclerosis due to its role in regulating endothelial responses to hemodynamic environments. Furthermore, PLPP3 expression can be promoted by the flow-sensitive transcription factor KLF2 (Wu et al. 2015), which, according to our study, was down-regulated in the in vitro experiments (fold change = 0.21). Normally, KLF2/PLPP3 maintains the formation of anti-flow endothelial cell alignment and contributes to the anti-inflammation/adhesion phenotype of endothelial cells by inhibiting lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and the downstream LPA receptor (LPAR) signaling pathway (Wu et al. 2015). Interestingly, oxLDL-derived LPA was recently shown to promote the progression of AS through the LPAR1/NF-κB pathway (Nsaibia et al. 2017). Thus, down-regulation of KLF2/PLPP3 may contribute to LPA overproduction and activation of downstream procalcification pathways. Given the similarities between CAVD and atherosclerosis (Sathyamurthy and Alex 2015), PLPP3 and its downstream pathways, particularly those related to lipid peroxidation, may be important in regulating the biomechanical response. This hypothesis requires additional experimental studies to confirm.

The importance of ID1, otherwise known as ‘inhibitor of DNA binding-1’, in angiogenesis is well described (Wang et al. 2011). ID1 promotes endothelial progenitor cell proliferation via the PI3K/Akt/NFκB/Survivin pathway (Li et al. 2012). As endothelial progenitor cells are essential for endothelial repair (Kirton and Xu 2010), the down-regulation of ID1 (fold change = 0.46 in human samples; fold change = 0.41 in in vitro experiments) many weaken the stability of aortic valves and may contribute to endothelial damage, inflammatory cell infiltration and valve calcification.

KIT, which encodes the human homolog of the proto-oncogene c-kit, is a transmembrane receptor for stem cell factors and is generally regarded as a cardioprotective gene (Yang et al. 2013). KIT was up-regulated in human calcific valves (fold change = 2.09) and was predicted to be one of the hub genes in the in vitro experiments (Fig. 4B). Up-regulation of the ‘protective’ gene KIT in calcific samples casts doubt on whether it functions as a protective gene in CAVD. Additionally, as KIT has been widely investigated as an oncogene, we hypothesize that anti-cancer drugs targeting KIT or its related pathways may be protective against CAVD.

PLAU and HMOX1 expression showed discrepancies between the in vivo data and the in vitro data (Fig. 2B). PLAU was up-regulated among human samples (fold change = 2.24) but was down-regulated in the in vitro study (fold change = 0.37). PLAU encodes urokinase-type plasminogen activator (u-PA), which is associated with extracellular proteolysis and angiogenesis (Stojkovic et al. 2014). Angiogenesis, a feature of inflammation and extracellular remodeling, might be cardioprotective in myocardial infarction. However, it may contribute to the progression of CAVD and, therefore, may be a key step in valve calcification (Weiss et al. 2013). Because PLAU was down-regulated in cultured endothelial cells under oscillatory shear stress conditions, the elevation in PLAU expression in calcific aortic valves might be caused by other cell types.

HMOX1, which encodes heme oxygenase 1, was up-regulated among human samples (fold change = 3.38) but was down-regulated in the in vitro study (fold change = 0.38). HMOX1 is regarded as an antioxidative and atheroprotective gene (Pechlaner et al. 2015) and has been reported to be involved in hemodynamics-related arterial remodeling (Freidja et al. 2011). Although HMOX1 was up-regulated in calcific valve samples, its down-regulation in aortic valve endothelial cells under disturbed blood flow conditions may still contribute to oxidation, inflammation and calcification.

In summary, these five genes may play hemodynamics-related roles in the development of CAVD. However, considering the relatively short stimulation time in the in vitro study (24 hours), these genes may play important roles in early biological changes of CAVD, making them potential drug targets for disease prevention. Their exact roles in the etiology of valve calcification should be explored in future studies. At the same time, we may discover that these hemodynamics-related genes are inextricably linked with oxidative stress, inflammation and extracellular remodeling.

Oxidative stress has been shown to participate in the development of CAVD (Miller et al. 2008; Kennedy et al. 2009; Li and Förstermann 2013) and be associated with local hemodynamic changes (Richards et al. 2013). NOS3, commonly known as eNOS, has long been known for its protective effects against aortic valve inflammation and calcification (Clapp et al. 2004; Kennedy et al. 2009). Low expression of eNOS can reduce the cellular NO level, thus contributing to oxidative stress and facilitating eNOS uncoupling, which will, in turn, increase the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and promote further oxidative damage to the endothelium (Miller et al. 2008; Li and Förstermann 2013).

In the present work, NOS3 was down-regulated in the in vitro study following exposure to a disturbed hemodynamic environment (fold change = 0.42). NOS3 was also identified as a hub gene that responds to hemodynamic changes (Fig. 4B). According to the literature, NOS3 is a mechano-sensitive gene that is regulated by the flow-sensitive KLF2 transcription factor (SenBanerjee et al. 2004; Richards et al. 2013). The findings suggest that there is a close relationship between hemodynamics and endothelial oxidative stress in the development of CAVD.

Considering that both PLPP3 and NOS3 are positively regulated by the flow-sensitive transcription factor KLF2, we searched the KEGG database for KLF2 to determine related pathways in different hemodynamic environments. ‘Fluid shear stress and atherosclerosis pathway’ (ko05418) revealed that under normal laminar shear stress, KLF2 is produced via the MEP2K5/MEPK7/MEF2 pathway and can reduce the expression of the procalcification gene NF-κB. The ‘FoxO signaling pathway’ (ko04068) revealed that KLF2 transcription is promoted by Smad3/4 and deacetylated FoxO but is inhibited by FoxG1. However, expression differences in the above genes were revealed in neither the human samples nor the in vitro study. Therefore, the upstream pathway that regulates KLF2 expression and plays an important role in the etiology of CAVD is still unknown.

Although disrupted lipid metabolism and deposition contribute to the development of atherosclerosis and although CAVD resembles atherosclerosis in many ways (Sathyamurthy and Alex 2015), in the present work, neither GO terms nor KEGG pathways related to lipid metabolism were among the top-ranked lists in human samples. Moreover, statins (inhibitors of HMG Co-A reductase and reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) have been shown to be unable to halt the progression of CAVD in recent randomized clinical trials (Chan et al. 2010). Similarly, in our study, as suggested by the KEGG analysis (Fig. 3D), the steroid biosynthesis pathway was significantly down-regulated in the fHAVECs exposed to oscillatory shear stress. Therefore, lipid production may not be a major concern in CAVD progression, whereas lipid retention and modification may play key roles in CAVD etiology.

Lipid peroxidation may be one of the underlying lipid modification processes during valve calcification, as valve mineralization is strongly promoted by oxidized low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and its derived reactive lipid species (Cote et al. 2008; Nadlonek et al. 2013). Recently, oxidized phospholipids were recognized as a critical factor in the development and progression of CAVD (Yeang et al. 2016; Kamstrup et al. 2017). Furthermore, oxidized phospholipid binding with apo(a) could induce pro-inflammatory IL-8 expression (Scipione et al. 2015). Considering the formation of oxidized phospholipids by lipid peroxidation (Greig et al. 2012) and the distinct regulatory functions of different oxidized phospholipids species on inflammation (Freigang 2016), it may be helpful to reveal the impact of oxidative stress on the profiles of oxidized phospholipids and the exact roles of specific oxidized lipid metabolites in the initiation and progression of CAVD.

Inflammation is closely related to oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction and is thought to be the precursor of aortic valve calcification (Raggi 2015; Siti et al. 2015). Both the results of our study and the literature indicate that inflammation plays an important role in aortic valve calcification.

The leukocyte transendothelial migration pathway and GO terms regarding the leukocyte-mediated immune response were significantly enriched among human calcific valves, as revealed by our analysis. Endothelial adhesion molecules such as VCAM-1 (fold change = 2.88 among human samples) contribute to the initiation of leukocyte infiltration and inflammation. Adhesion molecules like VCAM-1 have also been reported to be overexpressed in altered hemodynamic environments (Sucosky et al. 2009). Given the above facts, the initiation of inflammation may be inextricably linked with the local hemodynamic environment.

CXCL8 (also known as IL-8), a pro-inflammatory cytokine that is up-regulated (fold change = 2.11) in calcific aortic valves, belongs to the CXC chemokine family and is often regarded as a mediator of the inflammatory response (Russo et al. 2014). In the present work, IL-8 was identified as the hub gene in CAVD with the highest score among human samples (Fig. 4A). Meanwhile, GO terms related to the regulation of IL-8 production were significantly down-regulated in cultured fHAVECs exposed to an oscillatory hemodynamic environment. Moreover, as suggested by the literature, oxidized phospholipids bind with apo(a) to induce IL-8 expression (Scipione et al. 2015). These findings indicate that dysregulation of IL-8 production is a key node in the complex network connecting the local hemodynamic environment, oxidative stress and inflammatory response.

Extracellular remodeling is a key process in CAVD (Chen and Simmons 2011) and has long been regarded as a result of inflammation (Kaden et al. 2005). Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) can contribute to the initial loss of collagen, damages in endothelial integrity, extracellular matrix remodeling, exacerbating inflammation and, finally, inducing valve calcification (Nissinen and Kahari 2014; Pasipoularides 2016). As indicated by our study, MMP12 was the most up-regulated gene in calcific valves (fold change = 18.71); MMP1, 7, 9 and 13 were all up-regulated DEGs, while TIMP (tissue inhibitor of metalloproteases) was significantly down-regulated.

CTHRC1, also known as ‘collagen triple helix repeat containing 1’, was up-regulated in calcific valves and was predicted to be highly associated with CAVD by WGCNA. CTHRC1 has been reported to be associated with several cancers and promote the expression of MMP9 in an ERK-dependent manner (Kim et al. 2014). CTHRC1 inhibits Smad2/3 activation and reduces collagen deposition; thus, it is a key gene in vascular remodeling (LeClair and Lindner 2007). CTHRC1 has been widely studied in cancer biology and shown to play an important role in cardiovascular diseases, but its role in CAVD remains unclear.

SCG2, or secretogranin II, is a protein belonging to the chromogranin/secretogranin family of neuroendocrine secretory proteins. SCG2 was significantly up-regulated in calcific valves and was predicted to be a CAVD-related gene by WGCNA. Cleavage of SCG2 produces the active peptide secretoneurin, which could induce coronary angiogenesis in myocardial infarction by enhancing VEGF signaling in endothelial cells (Albrecht-Schgoer et al. 2012). As angiogenesis may contribute to CAVD progression (Weiss et al. 2013), it is necessary to ascertain the exact role of SCG2 in CAVD etiology.

In conclusion, we used integrated bioinformatics analysis to identify several key genes that are involved in the development and progression of CAVD, including KLF2, PLPP3, ID1, KIT, PLAU and HMOX1, which are involved in mechano-responses; eNOS, which is involved in oxidative stress; VCAM-1, MMPs and IL-8, which are involved in inflammation; and CTHRC1 and SCG2, which are involved in extracellular remodeling.

Furthermore, we predicted that mechano-response, oxidative stress, inflammation and extracellular remodeling pathways jointly form an indivisible, sophisticated network that underlies CAVD development: Aberrant mechanical stress inhibits flow-sensitive transcription factors (such as KLF2), thereby initiating the development of CAVD. Aberrant mechanical stress can lower the expression of anti-oxidation genes (such as PLPP3 and eNOS), causing eNOS uncoupling and oxidative stress. Oxidative stress promotes endothelial damage by the peroxidation of lipid metabolites, activating several procalcification pathways (such as the LPA/LAPR1/NF-κB pathway), damaging the integrity of the endothelium and promoting the expression of several inflammatory mediators (such as VCAM-1 and IL-8). Inflammation, which is characterized by the infiltration of leukocytes, can escalate oxidative stress and extracellular matrix remodeling (mediated by gene products, such as MMPs, CTHRC1 and SCG2). These all promote the procalcification phenotype shift in the valvular microenvironment and can further exacerbate CAVD progression.

This study had several limitations, mainly because of the certain degree of disconnection between the in vitro study and human samples. On one hand, the 24-hour treatment time in the fHAVEC experiments was relatively short and may not allow the observation of long-term changes following exposure to a chronically altered hemodynamic environment. On the other hand, unlike the in vitro experiments using cultured endothelial cells, human valve samples contain more than just the endothelium. The other cell types present in the sample may dilute the expression values of some genes. Additionally, all human samples evaluated in both datasets were derived from male patients. Considering that sex-dependent pathology exists in CAVD (Simard et al. 2017), it would be worthwhile to include more female-derived samples in future research. Although some limitations exist, this study still provides additional insight into the complex mechanisms of CAVD, which still require further research to confirm and explore.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by project BK20151590 of the National Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province. We would like to thank Dr. Na Qin from the Professor Hong-bing SHEN’s laboratory at the School of Public Health and Miss Tong Jin from the Department of Bioinformatics at the School of Basic Medical Sciences for their suggestions regarding this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References
 
© 2017 Tohoku University Medical Press
feedback
Top