IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems
Online ISSN : 1745-1361
Print ISSN : 0916-8532
Regular Section
Unsupervised Building Damage Identification Using Post-Event Optical Imagery and Variational Autoencoder
Daming LINJie WANGYundong LI
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2021 Volume E104.D Issue 10 Pages 1770-1774

Details
Abstract

Rapid building damage identification plays a vital role in rescue operations when disasters strike, especially when rescue resources are limited. In the past years, supervised machine learning has made considerable progress in building damage identification. However, the usage of supervised machine learning remains challenging due to the following facts: 1) the massive samples from the current damage imagery are difficult to be labeled and thus cannot satisfy the training requirement of deep learning, and 2) the similarity between partially damaged and undamaged buildings is high, hindering accurate classification. Leveraging the abundant samples of auxiliary domains, domain adaptation aims to transfer a classifier trained by historical damage imagery to the current task. However, traditional domain adaptation approaches do not fully consider the category-specific information during feature adaptation, which might cause negative transfer. To address this issue, we propose a novel domain adaptation framework that individually aligns each category of the target domain to that of the source domain. Our method combines the variational autoencoder (VAE) and the Gaussian mixture model (GMM). First, the GMM is established to characterize the distribution of the source domain. Then, the VAE is constructed to extract the feature of the target domain. Finally, the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence is minimized to force the feature of the target domain to observe the GMM of the source domain. Two damage detection tasks using post-earthquake and post-hurricane imageries are utilized to verify the effectiveness of our method. Experiments show that the proposed method obtains improvements of 4.4% and 9.5%, respectively, compared with the conventional method.

Content from these authors
© 2021 The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top