Abstract
Consider an undirected multigraph G=(V, E) with n vertices and m edges, and let Ni denote the number of connected spanning subgraphs with i(m≥i≥n) edges, in G. Recently, we showed in [3] the validity of (m-i+1)Ni-1>(i-n+⌊3+√9+8(i-n)/2⌋)Ni for a simple graph and each i(m≥i≥n). Note that, from this inequality, (m-n)Nn/2Nn+1+Nn/(m-n+1)Nn-1≥2 is easily derived. In this paper, for a multigraph G and all i(m≥i≥n), we prove (m-i+1)Ni-1≥(i-n+2)Ni, and give a necessary and sufficient condition by which (m-i+1)Ni+1=(i-n+2)Ni. In particular, this means that (m-i+1)Ni+1>(i-n+⌊3+√9+8(i-n)/2⌋)Ni is not valid for all multigraphs, in general. Furthermore, we prove (m-n)Nn/2Nn+1+Nn/(m-n+1)Nn-1≥2, which is not straightforwardly derived from (m-i+1)Ni-1≥(i-n+2)Ni, and also introduce a necessary and sufficent condition by which (m-n)Nn/2Nn+1+Nn/(m-n+1)Nn-1=2. Moreover, we show a sufficient condition for a multigraph to have N2n>Nn-1Nn+1. As special cases of the sufficient condition, we show that if G contains at least [2/3(m-n)]+1 multiple edges between some pair of vertices, or if its underlying simple graph has no cycle with length more than 4, then N2n>Nn-1Nn+1.
