All issues
Volume 12, Issue 2
Displaying 1-7 of 7 articles from this issue
- |<
- <
- 1
- >
- >|
-
Shin-ichi Yonekawa1977 Volume 12 Issue 2 Pages 1-27,i
Published: March 15, 1978
Released on J-STAGE: November 18, 2010
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSIn the boom years of 1873-75 the Oldham people registered 76 cotton spinning companies, many of whose initiators were co-operaters in the local district. In this paper the author finds the basic facts of the companies in the formative period with special reference to their managerial aspects. Main sources are the documents preserved in the Public Record Office and Company Registration Office as well as the local newspapers published in the district.
It seems significant that these so-called 'co-operative' companies had a distinct management ideology different from that of private companies. It was democracy. Stockholders of the companies were mostly the people associated with the cotton industry, especially the cotton spinners according to their occupation in the stockholders' list, many of whom were operative cotton spinners. Even the largest stockholders had two to three hundred stocks at most. Almost of all directors with twenty to fifty stocks had other jobs connected with cotton industry and in those days the articles of association strictly prohibited a company officer from taking a seat in the board. Strategic dicisions were usually made at the general meeting of stockholders after heated debates. In consequence, the meetings of the board tended to turn into a mere formality.
Many of the managerial features of the companies seem to have stemmed from the experiences of the management of co-operative societies. One of the best examples is 'loans' in cotton spinning companies. An Act for Industrial and Provident Societies (1852) allowed the societies to have loan account with the interest rate less than six percent. The Sun Mill modelled upon the Rochdale Co-operative Cotton Manufacturing Society decided to have such loan accounts through the debates of the general meeting in the year of its foundation. The companies born in the following boom period followed the Sun Mill.View full abstractDownload PDF (3126K) -
Terushi Hara1977 Volume 12 Issue 2 Pages 28-48,ii
Published: March 15, 1978
Released on J-STAGE: November 18, 2010
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSShop Management, one of the most important works of F.W. Taylor, was translated into French by Henry Le Chatelier in 1907. The Principles of Scientific Management was also translated into French in 1912.
The French business circles were so much interested in this new system of labour management that French scholars wrote many articles on this subject. Charles Fremont, for example, showed in his article of 1913 the origin of chronometry in France. According to him, it was in 1688 that the chronometry was already applied in the military work in France for the first time. He wanted to show French originality in chronometry.
On the other hand, trade union leaders protested violently against the application. of this new system to French industries, so that the Taylor System was not easily accepted by French laborers.
According to H. Le Chatelier, the application of Taylor System failed in France because the French society lacked the common sense (Le Bons Sens) which prevailed in U.S.A.View full abstractDownload PDF (2401K) -
Kazuomi Yamaguchi1977 Volume 12 Issue 2 Pages 49-72,iii
Published: March 15, 1978
Released on J-STAGE: November 18, 2010
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSSince the 1920s, AT & T followed virtually unchanging policies towards dividends and debt, that is, the company maintained a constant $ 9 per share dividend policy and an average debt ratio of about one third. This conservative financial policy was based on a belief that the best way for a regulated utility such as AT & T to attract and hold the goodwill and faith of a large number of small shareholders was through regular reasonable dividends and the long-run safety capital structure.
To understand this belief and the present financial policies of AT & T, we must know its history. Then in this paper I tried to investigate the history of the AT & T's financial policies, in relation to their strategy for the national telephone monopoly and the management thoughts of their leaders.View full abstractDownload PDF (2618K) -
[in Japanese]1977 Volume 12 Issue 2 Pages 73-74
Published: March 15, 1978
Released on J-STAGE: November 18, 2010
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSDownload PDF (202K) -
[in Japanese]1977 Volume 12 Issue 2 Pages 75-77
Published: March 15, 1978
Released on J-STAGE: November 18, 2010
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSDownload PDF (337K) -
[in Japanese]1977 Volume 12 Issue 2 Pages 77-83
Published: March 15, 1978
Released on J-STAGE: November 18, 2010
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSDownload PDF (865K) -
[in Japanese], [in Japanese]1977 Volume 12 Issue 2 Pages 84-91
Published: March 15, 1978
Released on J-STAGE: November 18, 2010
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSDownload PDF (1057K)
- |<
- <
- 1
- >
- >|