Currently, measurement of anti-SS-A and anti-SS-B antibodies has been carried out for most diagnostic reagents based on the principle of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The results are reported as numerical data. However, values are not standardized because every reagent manufacturer uses different evaluation methods. We clarified the relationship between the measured values of seven reagents made by six companies. We then observed whether the measured value of each reagent could be matched by establishing a fixed standard. Standardization of anti-SS-A/B antibody using enzyme immunoassay was attempted using pooled serum, a CDC reference, and clinical samples, but this was difficult. Since more than a 32 times or higher titer of anti-SS-A antibody on double immunodiffusion (DID) was extracted as a factor suggesting congenital heart block (CHB), the values measured using various reagents corresponding to a DID titer of 32 times were estimated, but some cases were judged as negative based on the estimated value. Moreover, since the objective of the clinical use of an enzyme immunoassay is mainly ‘qualitative judgment’, many companies have not reported measured values of the reagents as the original antibody titers (particularly, for high-titer cases). Considering this current situation, a proposal for the standards requiring confirmation using DID was prepared: Confir-mation using DID is necessary when the value is 100 EU or higher on measurement using Bio-Rad, 80 units or higher using INOVA, an index value of 100 or higher using Cosmic,300 U/ml or higher using TFB, 240 U/ml or higher using Phadia, an index value of 100 or higher using MBL MESACUP, and 500 U/ml or higher using MBL STACIA.
View full abstract