We introduced a panel debate as part of a pediatric dentisry lesson for the students of the dentistry faculty. The following seven goals were set : a) To create growing interest in pediatric dentisry care; b) To grow the ability of collecting and organizing information; c) To grow the ability to think logically; d) To grow the ability for discussion and debate; e) To grow the ability to listen to others; f) To grow the ability to address real problems; and g) To deepen the understanding of a patient's place and psychology.
Sicnce we conducted this experiment as a lesson, the participants were all the students of the dentistry faculty (89 studnets)
We chose a theme “Is compulsory care needed for pediatric dentistry care?”, and set the conditions of the patient and the disroder as “C
2 of primary teeth at the left mandibular of a three-year-old child.” We set three stances : parents, dentists (affirmative), and dentists (negative).
On the first day, the students performed discussions in small groups, and made argument drafts. On the second day, they played roles of argumentators, representatives, supporters, and judges, and performed a panel debate. As a result, the dentist (affirmative) group won the debate.
The results of a questionnaire for the students showed that more than 70% of the students answered that the abilities and understanding mentioned above as the goals to achieve “in-creased significantly, ” or “increased a little.” As for impressions and opnions, the students had both positive and negative opinions, and raised problems about the materials handed to them and problems about the way of conducing the debate.
View full abstract