Objective: Two simple, commercially available and semiquantitative dust mite allergen tests, namely, the Acarex test
® and Mitey Checker
®, were compared using 2 and 10 μg of Der 1 allergen per gram of dust, as evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), to clarify which method is better suited for practical use.
Methods: Mite allergen exposure levels of 106 floor, bed and sofa surfaces were evaluated by the Acarex test
®, Mitey Checker
®, and ELISA. A template of 100 cm×100 cm was placed on the same surfaces to identify the examined areas. A dust collection filter was attached to a vacuum cleaner, and the area in the template (1 m
2) was vacuumed. Then, to evaluate the other two tests, samples from the two other areas in the template (1 m
2) that neighbored each other and did not overlap were vacuumed.
Results: To predict Der 1 levels of 2 μg/g dust or higher, the sensitivity and specificity of the Acarex test
® were 100% and 13.3%, and those of Mitey Checker
® were 91.8% and 71.1%, respectively. To predict Der 1 levels of 10 μg/g dust or higher, the sensitivity and specificity of the Acarex test
® were 50.0% and 96.2%, and those of Mitey Checker
® were 85.7% and 79.5%, respectively. Compared with Der 1<2.0, 2.0-9.9, ≥10.0 (μg/g dust), the percent agreement and kappa of the Acarex test
® were 47.2% and 0.234, and those of Mitey Checker
® were 70.0% and 0.505, respectively.
Conclusion: To evaluate mite allergen exposure level for practical use in Japanese living environments, Mitey Checker
® is better than the Acarex test
® because of its higher sensitivity and specificity.
View full abstract