Background: Internal medicine physicians are able to convert to "general practitioners" in the future.

Objective: To examine factors related with "career conversion to a general practitioner" conceived by hospital internal-medicine physicians specializing in organs/regions.

Materials and Method: A semi-structured interview was conducted for 20 internal-medicine physicians with their consent from November 2014 to November 2015. The verbatim records were analyzed with the modified grounded theory approach.

Results: The facilitating factors for career conversion consisted of "a career plan where characteristics of a general practitioner can be utilized", "high-quality training that combines practical conditions", and "diverse ways of working and a specialist-licentiate who has opportunities for learning".

On the other hand, the suppressive factors consisted of "a lack of understanding of general practitioners", "difficulties associated with re-training", and "a feeling of resistance toward comprehensiveness of general practitioners".

Conclusions: Career conversion to general practitioner by qualified internal-medicine physicians was suggested to be promoted by enhancing the meaningfulness of the general practitioner license, the training circumstances, and ensuring the professionalism and financial aspects of physician life.

Objective: To clarify how and when Japanese family physicians assess families in their daily practice.

Methods: Participants were Japanese family physicians with over one year of experience of full-time work in their clinics, and who were able to join the focus group discussions (FGD) and member checking. The study employed a qualitative research design with semi-structured FGD. Two analysts examined video recordings of the FGD, and the results were verified through member checking and the checking by external members.

Results: Physicians assessed families naturally while examining patients for common cold, during vaccination, and during registration in the Japanese care insurance system.

Additionally, the physicians assessed the families when they observed or suspected something strange regarding the patient and/or the family.

Families were assessed based on how they spent their time during special Japanese events that the family members attended together (e.g., Bon festival or Japanese style New Year holidays), the patient's illness behavior in non-reserved outpatient clinics, and their communication patterns. Furthermore, the family photograph technique for family therapy was also used for assessment.

Conclusion: Participants utilized skills of family therapy such as communication patterns and family photographs. They also employed unique skills such as assessment of the families' sharing time during traditional events, assessment of the patient's illness behavior, and general assessments regarding the Japanese care insurance system.

Morphine is the only opioid that has been found effective for the relief of dyspnea in cancer patients. However, efficacy has not been fully demonstrated for other opioids such as fentanyl. Here, we report a case of lung cancer in which the use of fentanyl was effective for the relief of dyspnea. The patient was an 88-year-old man who had cT4N2M0, cStage IIIB lung cancer with right bronchial involvement and mediastinal lymph node metastases. Although the patient complained of dyspnea, he was not given morphine due to underlying renal dysfunction. He instead received oxygen therapy, and treatment with oral steroids and oxycodone. As oral administration became more difficult with subsequent lung cancer progression, the patient underwent opioid switching from oxycodone to subcutaneous injections of fentanyl. Dyspnea was not exacerbated following the switching, and was thereafter effectively managed by increasing the fentanyl dose and using rescue medication. Fentanyl is suggested to be a possible therapeutic option for dyspnea in cases where the use of morphine is difficult.