The current study examines conventionalised illocutionary forces of three canonical event schema constructions (CESCs) (States/SVC, Location/SV, Possession/SVO) (e.g., Radden & Dirven, 2007) in spoken English as a replication study reframed from a cognitive pragmatics perspective. It also compares the strengths and directions of illocutionary force salience through collostructional analysis (e.g., Dunn, 2018, 2022; Gries, 2011, 2013, 2017, 2019; Gries & Stefanowitsch, 2004; Gries, Hampe, & Schönefeld, 2005, 2010; Hampe, 2013; Schmid & Küchenhoff, 2013; Stefanowitsch, 2013; Stefanowitsch & Gries, 2003). As a result, the following indirect speech acts and their conventionalised illocutionary forces, which emerged from three CESCs, were statistically confirmed: (1) the States/SVC construction (present: identifying (defining), expressing pleasure and dissatisfaction, asking; past: reporting); (2) the Location/SV construction (present: reporting, asking, correcting; past: reporting); and (3) the Possession/SVO construction (past: reporting, expressing probability, asking; perfective: reporting, correcting, asking).
抄録全体を表示