The purpose of this study was to explore the influences of “feeling of health” upon the cognitive and physiological responses and coping behavior with anxiety.
Eight students with extremely high and low “Feeling of Health lnventory(FHI)” scores, participated in the experiment as subjects. Ss were instructed that aversive stimuli would be given after count-down, so that they might feel strong anticipatory anxiety. Then they were asked to cope with anxiety cognitively. The congnitive and physiological responses in the anticipatory session and the contents of coping behavior with anxiety were compaired between two groups.
As results, Ss with high FHI scores, 1. showed smaller changes of heart beats, 2. showed less fluctuation of volume pulse wave and higher self-efficacy to avoidance behavior, 3. felt much relaxed, and 4. tended to do more cognitive coping behavior in the anticipatory session than Ss with low FHI scores respectively.
These results were discussed within the framework of the self-efficacy theory, concerning with the cognitive coping strategy with anxiety.

View full abstract

The present study investigated the application of the Holtzman Inkblot Technique (HIT) for the assessment of people who showed Type A behavior, mainly based on the criterion-related validity. HIT and the Japanese Version of the Jenkins Activity Survey Student Version (JAS-S) were administered to 72 undergraduate students (32 male, 40 female). Some of these subjects were identified either as Type A subjects or Type B subjects based on the scores obtained on JAS-S. Type A subjects’ HIT scores were compared with the Type B subjects’. Type A group showed significantly higher HIT scores in Space, Shading, Animal, Hostility, Barrier, Penetration and Popular, and also significantly lower scores in Reaction Time, Color and Anatomy than those obtained by Type B group (P<.05). These results indicated that Type A person’s personality included internal anxiety as well as self-confidence. A preliminary discriminant model of Type A and Type B using HIT variables was presented.

View full abstract

The present study is an attempt to revalidate the Lazarus’ concept of the ways of coping with stress, using an original 66-item version of the Checklist and a revised 50-item version of the scales of 8, in two culturally contrasting samples. Results of responses in each coping strategy, mode, or scale among the Japanese were found to be similar to those of Americans, in that there was no significant difference in each strategy, mode, or scale between two representative samples (adolescents). Despite, some results approached significance, indicating that the Japanese tend to inhibit their actions less facing the stress (showing greater tendency to depend on benevolent others or Amae), to be less aggressive, hostile or risk taking (cautious or timid), and less wishful thinkers (modest, accepting/adapting well to given situations) than Americans. These results were consistent with previous studies of coping, indicating that there is a reasonable degree of intercultural functional equivalence in the Lazarus’ concept. It was hypothesized that the patterns of responses over the present scales can be used as culture-fair health indexes which could predict the proneness to major somatic diseases, that are applied equally to Americans and Japanese.

View full abstract