Journal of Learning Analytics
Online ISSN : 2436-6862
Volume 5
Displaying 1-2 of 2 articles from this issue
  • Yoshinobu Okano, Masahiro Furumoto, Sota Oshima, Hideki Takenaka, Hiro ...
    2021 Volume 5 Pages 1-12
    Published: April 07, 2022
    Released on J-STAGE: November 09, 2022
    JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS
    PBL-type classes have been widely introduced as a method of team education, but sometimes the team goes astray, and both the implementer and the participants end up not being able to feel the effects of PBL. For the two years of the “Research Project Exercise (4)” offered by the university, an activation and evaluation of the project activities by the teams were analyzed using the indicators of working hours, deviation from a certain progress, and margin of team. As a result, the introduction of reviewing the previous year's final report and the holding of multiple debriefing sessions resulted in a smoother project start and increased working hours. We also introduced the Gini coefficient as an index to evaluate team activation, and applied it to the working hours of the team and the members in the first and second years. The results showed that the working hours was closer to equal distribution in the second year than in the first year, and the variation in teams' and members' working hours was significantly reduced. The method described in this paper can be used to evaluate the activation of teams and team members, to quantitatively identify teams and team members that are not showing significant activation, and to determine the need for leveraging.
    Download PDF (1710K)
  • Takahiro Nakamura
    2021 Volume 5 Pages 13-23
    Published: 2021
    Released on J-STAGE: February 28, 2023
    JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS
    In order to establish a learning guidance method for children with developmental disabilities, we clarified effective educational methods and learning support methods for these children through comparison of various teaching materials. The participants were 40 second-year junior high school students, whose IQs were around 70. In this paper, compared the differences in learning results between ICT teaching materials (video teaching materials) and descriptive teaching materials (paper media). These students were randomly assigned to one of the four groups. In the two of these groups the students learned ICT (video) materials; in the other two groups paper-and-pencil materials were used. The students have learned math and Japanese in a 45-minut class twice a week for one year. Based on the scores of monthly tests and the number of problems the students worked through, it is concluded that the print-type, paper-and-pencil materials, which can be solved in 5 to 10 minutes, were most effective.
    Download PDF (1243K)
feedback
Top