[Objective] To verify the degree of gender bias among participants in disability acceptance research in Japan. [Methods] Target articles were extracted using CiNii Articles run by the National Institute of Informatics. The ratio was calculated by checking the number of articles that included the phrases “disability acceptance,” “mother,” “father,” “parent,” and “family” in the titles. In addition, the number of papers including “parent” and “family” in the subject matter was confirmed, and the differences in participants that were dealt with in the text were confirmed and compared. [Results] A total of 58 articles were extracted, with 32 addressing disability acceptance by mothers, two regarding fathers, 20 on parents, and four on family members. In 23 of the 24 articles that included “parent” and “family” in the title, the participants in the text were most commonly “mothers.” The mean percentage of participants was 84.7% mothers, 11.8% fathers, and 3.5% others. [Conclusion] The culture that emphasizes mother-child integration is deeply rooted in Japanese research disciplines, and it has become clear that experts and researchers unconsciously view mothers as the main beneficiaries of disability acceptance.
抄録全体を表示