-
The Special Report: 20th Anniversary of the Foundation of the Society Meeting Preparatory Committee Round-Table
Yuji ITOH, Keiichiro ICHINOSE, Yukio ITSUKUSHIMA, Makiko NAKA
2020 Volume 20 Issue 1 Pages
1-15
Published: 2020
Released on J-STAGE: November 01, 2022
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Yasushi OHASHI, Kotaro TAKAGI
2020 Volume 20 Issue 1 Pages
16-17
Published: 2020
Released on J-STAGE: November 01, 2022
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Psychological Assessment of Statements
Naohisa MORI
2020 Volume 20 Issue 1 Pages
18-23
Published: 2020
Released on J-STAGE: November 01, 2022
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Psychological Assessment of Statements
Hikaru TOKUNAGA
2020 Volume 20 Issue 1 Pages
24-31
Published: 2020
Released on J-STAGE: November 01, 2022
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Psychological Assessment of Statements
Akio ISHIZUKA
2020 Volume 20 Issue 1 Pages
32-34
Published: 2020
Released on J-STAGE: November 01, 2022
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
A Review and Prospect of Law and Psychology Studies on the Saiban-in System
Masahiro FUJITA, Masahiko SAEKI
2020 Volume 20 Issue 1 Pages
35-36
Published: 2020
Released on J-STAGE: November 01, 2022
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
A Review and Prospect of Law and Psychology Studies on the Saiban-in System
Masahiro FUJITA
2020 Volume 20 Issue 1 Pages
37-43
Published: 2020
Released on J-STAGE: November 01, 2022
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
A Review and Prospect of Law and Psychology Studies on the Saiban-in System
Satoru SHINOMIYA
2020 Volume 20 Issue 1 Pages
44-51
Published: 2020
Released on J-STAGE: November 01, 2022
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
A Review and Prospect of Law and Psychology Studies on the Saiban-in System
Takashi ISHII
2020 Volume 20 Issue 1 Pages
52-56
Published: 2020
Released on J-STAGE: November 01, 2022
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
A Review and Prospect of Law and Psychology Studies on the Saiban-in System
Akira SUGENO
2020 Volume 20 Issue 1 Pages
57-63
Published: 2020
Released on J-STAGE: November 01, 2022
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
A Review and Prospect of Law and Psychology Studies on the Saiban-in System
Koushi KUNII
2020 Volume 20 Issue 1 Pages
64-71
Published: 2020
Released on J-STAGE: November 01, 2022
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Workshops at the Twentieth Congress of JSLP
Mitsuaki MURAYAMA, Toshiya YAMAMOTO, Akio ISHIZUKA
2020 Volume 20 Issue 1 Pages
72-78
Published: 2020
Released on J-STAGE: November 01, 2022
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Workshops at the Twentieth Congress of JSLP
Akiko TANAKA, Yoshiko HABUCHI, Megumi MIHARA, Makiko NAKA
2020 Volume 20 Issue 1 Pages
79-86
Published: 2020
Released on J-STAGE: November 01, 2022
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Workshops at the Twentieth Congress of JSLP
Katsumi MATSUMOTO, Takeshi MURAMOTO, Takahito SHIMADA
2020 Volume 20 Issue 1 Pages
87-93
Published: 2020
Released on J-STAGE: November 01, 2022
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Workshops at the Twentieth Congress of JSLP
Mitsuyuki INABA, Yukio ITSUKUSHIMA, Yuko YAMASAKI, Takeshi OHARA
2020 Volume 20 Issue 1 Pages
94-102
Published: 2020
Released on J-STAGE: November 02, 2022
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Workshops at the Twentieth Congress of JSLP
Ai ONOHAR, Akinori OTANI, Saki YAMADA, Yuko YAMASAKI, Sungeun KIM, Nor ...
2020 Volume 20 Issue 1 Pages
103-110
Published: 2020
Released on J-STAGE: November 01, 2022
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Workshops at the Twentieth Congress of JSLP
Mei YAMAGATA, Karin TOZUKA, Takeshi HONJO
2020 Volume 20 Issue 1 Pages
111-120
Published: 2020
Released on J-STAGE: November 01, 2022
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Workshops at the Twentieth Congress of JSLP
Ai UEMIYA, Makiko NAKA, Ayumi, SUZUKI, Kengo YOKOMITSU, Hiroshi YAMA, ...
2020 Volume 20 Issue 1 Pages
121-127
Published: 2020
Released on J-STAGE: November 01, 2022
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Satoshi TSURUTA
2020 Volume 20 Issue 1 Pages
128-140
Published: 2020
Released on J-STAGE: November 01, 2022
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
Focusing on the complementarity of legal and social sanctions against criminals, this study examined how jurists’ sentencing decisions differ from those that a layperson would make, and how this difference affects lay-people’s desire for social sanctions. An experiment was conducted in which participants were presented with media reports about criminal cases and asked how they would have sentenced the convicted person in each case. Next, the participants were informed of the actual sentences that the jurists passed in the cases and then asked to describe, among other things, their desire for social sanctions against the convicted person. The results indicated that the more insufficient the participants perceived the actual sentences to be, the more strongly they desired social sanctions. In this way, the participants’ decisions reflected the complementarity of legal and social sanctions against criminals. This study suggested that legal sanctions may be able to restrain social sanctions.
View full abstract
-
Tomoya MUKAI, Kyoko FUJINO
2020 Volume 20 Issue 1 Pages
141-149
Published: 2020
Released on J-STAGE: November 01, 2022
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
This study aimed to examine the relation between punitiveness, identity instability, and exclusivity. The construct of identity has long been discussed in the field of psychology. Recently, criminological studies have argued that exclusivity mediates the relation between identity instability and punitiveness. Building on this argument and related empirical studies, the present study tested two hypotheses : (a) exclusivity mediates the relation between identity instability and support for harsher punishment, and (b) exclusivity mediates the relation between identity instability and support for criminalization. Questionnaires were administered to university students (N=192). The results of mediation analysis confirmed both hypotheses, thereby lending support to the criminological theory. The findings suggested that the abovementioned argument in criminological studies is useful for explaining individual level of punitiveness.
View full abstract
-
Facility Use after Introducing a System for Partially Suspended Sentences
Atsuko WATANABE, Nobuaki MORITA, Eri UKEDA, Ayumi ASATO, Junko KOIKE, ...
2020 Volume 20 Issue 1 Pages
150-158
Published: 2020
Released on J-STAGE: November 01, 2022
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
The present study aimed to clarify utilization of rehabilitation facilities by drug users. A questionnaire survey was administered to 100 directors of rehabilitation facilities nationwide. Participants were 12 drug treatment-focused facilities and 52 non-drug treatment-focused facilities. The percentage of offenders using the system for partially suspended sentences for drug law violations comprised almost 17% of users at drug treatment-focused facilities and almost 10% of users at non-drug treatment-focused facilities. It was assumed that it was difficult for offenders in the partially suspended sentence system to make time to attend treatment programs and that they were influenced by motivation to recover from drug addiction. Regarding cooperation with related organizations, it is suggested that cooperation is difficult due to the lack of social resources and geographical problems, although there is a need to support medical institutions. It is necessary to consider support for rehabilitation facilities for users of the system for partially suspended sentences for drug law violations, which will increase in the future, so that facilities can continue to smoothly support the community after violators are released.
View full abstract
-
Yuma MATSUKI, Tomoya MUKAI
2020 Volume 20 Issue 1 Pages
159-164
Published: 2020
Released on J-STAGE: November 01, 2022
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
This study examined the relationship between perceived risk and knowledge about crime. In particular, it conceptualized perceived risk of crime as consisting of social-level, individual-level, and vicarious perceptions of risk, and knowledge as being subjective and objective. Additionally, the relationships between these variables were examined. A questionnaire consisting of scales measuring perceived risk and knowledge about crime and frequency of exposure to media (newspapers, TV, and internet) was distributed to 330 respondents (males = 187, females = 143) via a web survey company. The results of a multiple regression analysis indicated that the greater the subjective knowledge about crime that individuals had, the more the perceived risk of crime. In contrast, results also showed that the more the objective knowledge individuals had, the less the perceived risk of crime. Based on these results, the implication of the relationships between perceived risk and knowledge about crime were discussed.
View full abstract
-
Yasushi OHASHI
2020 Volume 20 Issue 1 Pages
165-167
Published: 2020
Released on J-STAGE: November 01, 2022
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Taro MURAMATSU
2020 Volume 20 Issue 1 Pages
168-170
Published: 2020
Released on J-STAGE: November 01, 2022
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Kosuke WAKABAYASHI
2020 Volume 20 Issue 1 Pages
171-172
Published: 2020
Released on J-STAGE: November 01, 2022
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Workshops at the Nineteenth Congress of JSLP
Mitsuaki MURAYAMA, Takashi YAMADA, Sumio HAMADA, Hisashi KOSAKAI
2020 Volume 20 Issue 1 Pages
177-183
Published: 2020
Released on J-STAGE: November 01, 2022
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Workshops at the Nineteenth Congress of JSLP
Mitsuaki MURAYAMA, Toshiya YAMAMOTO, Akio ISHIZUKA
2020 Volume 20 Issue 1 Pages
184-187
Published: 2020
Released on J-STAGE: November 01, 2022
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS