In this study, 153 undergraduates saw simulated TV news report of a corporate crime. In the news story, a manager of the company had been forced to use false labeling of origins and grades of meat by his superior. The news reporter explained the circumstance of the criminal act in the words of the accused man, the superior, or his own. In addition, they were told that the manager had been coerced, either by threat of demotion if the act was not complied with or promise of no demotion if complied with. A third group of participants were given no information concerning the context of the superior's order, except that it had been coercive, making a 3×3 factorial design. Results showed that the manager was judged less criminally responsible in the threat condition, replicating asymmetrical judgments of past studies. Also, in an interaction effect, the promise story was most damaging to the accused if it was told in the words of the news reporter.
View full abstract