A system for educating inspectors and accrediting hospitals for transfusion medicine (I&A System) did not become widespread under its former regulations. To clarify its significance in Japan, we examined the approximately 3-year outcomes after a relaunch of the system by the Japan Society of Transfusion Medicine and Cell Therapy.
The study involved 100 hospitals: 49 newly accredited and 51 re-accredited during the period from January, 2016 to March, 2019. The distribution of each of the accredited facilities and items for which improvement was advised upon inspection was examined. 2019.
A large number of accredited hospitals belonged to the Tohoku or Tokai Branch of the society. The mean number of mandatory and important items for accreditation for which improvement was advised upon inspection of the newly accredited hospitals was 2.6 and 5.3, respectively. Among the mandatory items requiring improvement, those related to the storage and management of blood products were the most frequent, followed by double-checking the blood type, and management of adverse events when collecting autologous.blood. Among the important items requiring improvement, those related to the management of and countermeasures against adverse events were the most frequent. The mean number of items for which there was a discrepancy between the self-inspection results and inspectors' opinion was 6.0. This suggests the importance of third-party inspections.
Our findings suggest that the I&A System was useful for improving medical safety, which is important for transfusion medicine. In the future, we will more actively disseminate useful information from an inspector/person concerned with accrediting facilities to healthcare professionals while promoting the sharing of this information with those engaged in transfusion medicine. We will also develop I&A programs that will further enhance the safety of blood transfusion.
View full abstract