Due to the damage caused by the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake and the active faults of the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake, it is becoming more important to anticipate actions that exceed the design. For situations that exceed expectations, it is important to consider recoverability and incorporate disaster mitigation perspectives that take into consideration reduction of impact and functional recovery into the design. If the bridge pier collapses, it will take an enormous amount of time to recover, so it is desirable to break the bearing at an appropriate time to ensure that the substructure is protected. Therefore, in this paper, we devised a countermeasure method for installing a member to control damage at the base of the steel pier, and verified its validity by experiments using a 1/8 reduced model specimen. We devised an FE model that is easy to apply to actual design for local buckling of steel pipes, cracks in internally filled concrete, contact phenomenon between anchors and control members, and performed time history response analysis that imitated actual bridges. The damage scenario for the action is shown. We devised an FE model that is easy to apply to actual design for local buckling of steel pipes, cracks in internally filled concrete, and contact phenomena between anchors and control members, and performed time history response analysis that imitated actual bridges. As a result, it was shown that the response due to the excess action was in line with the injury scenario.
View full abstract