During clinical training, medical and paramedical students who directly communicate with patients in various places, including the bedside, may be exposed to infectious diseases, and, in turn, become a source of infection themselves. A questionnaire survey was conducted involving faculty members of universities educating medical, nursing, and pharmacy students, to clarify the status of infection control education in their faculties, focusing on 20 lecture and 14 practice programs. Responses were obtained from 46 faculties of medicine (response rate: 58%), 97 of nursing (41%), and 53 of pharmacy (72%). Six lecture programs (standard precautions, transmission-based precautions, methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus infection control, norovirus infection control, purposes and methods of hand hygiene, and needlestick injuries) and 5 practice programs (hand rubbing using antiseptic hand rubs, hand scrubbing with running water and soap, and methods to appropriately wear and remove surgical masks, sterilized gloves, and gowns) were provided in more than 70% of the universities in each field. In contrast, lecture programs, such as
Clostridium difficile infection control, and practice programs, such as methods to appropriately wear and remove N95 respirators and personal proactive equipment, were provided in less than 50% of universities in some fields. These results revealed that the content of infection control education provided before clinical training varies among not only fields, but also faculties, highlighting the necessity of determining lecture and practice programs that should be provided before clinical training in medical and paramedical faculties.
View full abstract